Originally Posted by JohnBurke

I know what you posted, because you elected to post it.

You indicated that the old airplanes you flew were "jurassic antiquated turds." That doesn't speak well for your decision making. Old airplanes aren't "turds," but if you elected to fly "turds," that's on you.

I read your post, and read it again. You stated: "If you enjoy weekly meetings with the FEDS and are hell bent on dealing with a magnitude of daily and mechanical problems, then by all means, go fly around in some 60+ year airplane." You say that you didn't do anything to cause scrutiny by the "feds," but your company did. Who put the barrel of the gun to your head and forced you to fly for a company tht not only had a "magnitude of daily and mechanical problems," but also caused you to have "weekly meetings with the feds?"

Those were your words, weren't they? Why, yes they were. Go figure.

I try to exercise a little better judgement than to fly for someone that causes me to meet with the FAA every week, or that has a "magnitude of daily and mechanical problems." So what the fukk do we know about you? You've shown that you have poor judgement when it comes to aircraft, safety, and employers. You've shown that you've had a number of run-ins with the FAA. What else would you like us to know about you?

No assumptions were made in the framing of this post. If you'd rather not be quoted, then don't post.