Envoy or SkyWest on the crj at ORD
I'm looking at both of these airlines since I live near ORD. Anybody have some thoughts on quality of life, reserve times, line structure, etc in the crj at O'Hare with both Envoy and SkyWest? If anyone is willing to email me a bid packet to I could have a first hand look at how the lines are, where the overnights are on the crj, etc, that would be great and helpful. Thanks, I have a wife and 2 little ones so QOL is huge for us. Thanks in advance.
|
Isn't Envoy becoming all E-Jets? Thought the CRJs were going to PSA...
|
Looks like the crj is sticking around for a while, I've been told.
|
Quote:
|
It appears the 700s will slowly goto PSA in 2017-2018. Envoy will have over 100 ejets over the next few years, and close to 100 145s until 2022-2024ish.
You should pick what is best for you long term. Both are in good positions for long term sustainability. Envoy does appear to be contracting some in ord. I'd highly recommend taking an airline with flow. I have a few friends who are captains at skywest and can't get a call from the majors (why I have no idea) and can't afford going to a lcc. Tifiw |
There is a lot of things to take into consideration when choosing a regional. But if quality of life is big for you, you should probably go with Skywest.
Right now, QOL at Envoy is terrible, it's sustainable if you live on base (which is your case) but not great.. More and more people bid reserve because the lines are so bad.. And reserve is not good either. They have awful reserve rules. I'm not saying it will never change, but the facts right now are what I just said. On the bright side, Envoy has a flow, and you'd make more money than at Skywest.. Good luck! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
More than likely you are just spouting nonsense you heard on here, same as all the other garbage advice advice that many many many pilots have proven to be incorrect, such as "don't chase an upgrade". By all means though: Be an FO for 8 years and don't have a flow in your back pocket incase no one calls you. Most of the "institutional" advice seen on here is either badly outdated or was never really correct in the first place and was given by jaded, bitter pilots that were unfortunate victims of timing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The flow is working. To insinuate otherwise is misleading. Making a snarky comment about the flow not working is ignorance akin to "Uphill both ways in 2 feet of snow". It is outdated and untrue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Envoy wins on pay, unless you get stuck for like 15 years. Why not have a flow to fall back on? You have turned this into a totally different discussion now. Maybe you should be a politician instead of a pilot? |
Quote:
|
Yeah, 12 years to flow won't help any new-hire. One is likely to be hired by AA off the street before their number is drawn lol.
|
To the OP having worked at both airlines I can tell you the difference in management styles and just overall atmosphere is night and day! If you have specific questions send me a PM.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are certain scheduling managers and VP's there that have to go before anything will actually improve! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What we're trying to say is no, a flow is not guaranteed. However, it is working and it is nice to have in your back pocket. It's better than not having it at all. As far as QOL we all know Envoy is not perfect, however, it is far from what people post here. Yes, there's disgruntled people, especially very senior people. I talk to my friends at TSA, Skywest, Expressjet, etc and they all complain about the same. Pick your poison. Might as well do it with more pay and flow.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
American airlines changed the entire flight file and network. They literally added a mid day flights to places like Waterloo Iowa to help the schedules. Unfortunately that takes a few months to implement. January is when it hits. The damage of Scott Kirby is massive and its being addressed. First was cash, and honesty alot of it . Now bases and schedules. The arbitrator will set the tone where we go with rsv. Trustme I've lived the nightmare here. But the steps are being taken. It will take a few months. The schedules are being addressed and fixed. In a few months mesa or someone eelse willbe posting how bad their flying from aa is. Which again is why saying oh this regional sucks because xxxx isn't a good reason to pick one. It changes and fast. Pick a regional in the place you lliveand if more than one pick one with a good reputation and my opinion a flow. I think off the street hiring is drying up very fast, and flows will continue to be the norm along with pref interviews. I have a squeaky clean record, a dad at united an uncle at Delta and more job fairs and lors than I know what to do with. Im god honest assuming ill flow at this point. I have friends who have been told by main they are too qualified and the computer will neverppickthem. My worst nightmare is 35 more years at ANY regional or even LCC. I'm very happy for the flow. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The conversations we have about them not getting the call usually end up revealing that they haven't (refuse to) attended any job fairs, don't meet some requirements (degree), haven't updated their apps.... |
Quote:
The pref interviews have even put the highly connected on the back burner for United. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) If you don't work for an AA WO, you can certainly apply to AA as an off the street hire. However, your chances are very slim that you will get hired because only 25-30% of new hires at AA are coming from off the street, and most of those are military pilots. That leaves UA and DA. Delta traditionally has hired about 50% of its pilots from the military. So maybe your odds aren't so good there (unless you go work for Endeavor, which is probably your best shot. And even they only have a 40-50% pass rate for their interview with Delta). That leaves UA, who also hires a large percentage of military pilots. However you can go work for an AA WO, have the exact same odds as every other non-WO pilot applying at DA and UA except for one thing: You have a guaranteed flow in your back pocket, "just in case". 2) AA has said that they are moving non-WO flying back to their WOs. That means pilots flying for other regionals may not have a job within a couple years. They are going to continue raising pay and improving the flow agreements as needed to attract pilots. ...There is a lot of speculation about what AA may do to attract pilots in the next couple years. I've heard everything from the well thought out and plausible (DoH), to the absurd (staple). Either way, things will continue to improve and the WOs will only further outpace the rest of the industry in terms of compensation and benefits as the pilot shortage deepens. |
One flaw in point number 2
Skywest just signed a long term agreement with AA to place a bunch of our Crj 700's in PHX and ORD so..... |
Quote:
SkyWest is being positioned to do the flying that PSA was at one point slated to do out of ORD. And AA is likely positioning you to do Mesa flying out of PHX. I wouldn't even be surprised if some of Mesa's 900s end up at SkyWest. The 700s that AAG is transferring from Envoy to PSA are likely either going to take over Republic flying in DCA, or they will be dispersed throughout our bases and our 200s will end up in DCA doing Whiskey's flying out of there. |
Quote:
Pick your poison, I'm still happy I picked eagle. |
Quote:
Once upon a time 'eagle' was slated to get around 90 Crj 900's! Remember that? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons
Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands