Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Alpa Fdx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2007, 08:02 AM
  #331  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,238
Default

1. How long have you been here (FDX)?
2. Is FDX your first Major Airline Job?
3. Would you agree that seniority is foundation of our system?

1. 5 years

2. Fedex is my third airline, and I flew corporate before that. Got my ticket signed in 1986, if that makes any difference. (I've also flown 60 makes and models, been through 10 part 121 training programs, including both the DC-10 twice and the MD-11 twice, and was an MD-11 captain when I came here. There... I feel much better....)

3. If I was a smart-aleck I'd say evidently not, because I'm going to lose about 5 years' worth from all this (or more if the FE's come back). But I'll just say that we all knew the game coming in - make hay till you're sixty and then you lose your seniority or get to only use it on a panel. Don't give me the "seniority is a bedrock of our profession." So was age 60. So bedrocks don't always last forever.


All this "young feller" talk is to say, you don't count for much. We'll let you pull gear and pay dues, but you ain't sh!t at this company until you're a widebody captain. O.K., I can deal with that. I know where I stand with you Redeye. Let's see where that gets us....
Huck is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:09 AM
  #332  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis
If I understand it, your premise is, if the new rules are written so that it is at all legally possible for a current over 60 to return to a window seat (which even DW thinks is a remote possiility,) screw him, he's old so keep him out of the front seat.

So, how do you feel about the guys who hit 60 at the other carriers with no back seat? Do you support their right to reclaim their jobs and seniority? How about our over 60s who wanted to keep flying but were presented with the choice of having a bigger retirement check than they could make as an S/O and hence, for economic reasons, retired?
If retroctivety is approved, I don't think it's a stretch to throw these guys in the mix. The feds have publicly stated that these guys and the over 60 S/Os will not go back, why not fight for all of them?
Our guys that retired made that choice and should not be able to come back. Our S/Os over age 60 chose to stay, remain on the pilot system seniority list, have every right to return. You just don't get to ignore the contract because it may have a negative impact on you.

If retroactivity happens to be approved by Congress the FAA has no say. I believe any pilot forced off their list on or after November 23, 2006 should be returned.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:13 AM
  #333  
SNAFU
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You believe in the tooth fairy too.
 
Old 05-11-2007, 08:15 AM
  #334  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: B757 Capt
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter
I believe any pilot forced off their list on or after November 23, 2006 should be returned.

And you use the date Nov 23, 06 for what reason?
Gooch121 is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:17 AM
  #335  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Window Seat -- Left Side
Posts: 112
Thumbs down ALPA-PAC and Age 65 -- FedEx

Gooch and others,

I just REVOKED my ALPA-PAC contribution. Simply e-mail ALPA at: [email protected]

Include your name, airline, member number, and intentions to discontinue support of ALPA-PAC.

This was not a knee-jerk reaction for me. I have read and heard all of the rhetoric. I am an active member of ALPA, and active FedEx ALPA committee member, and I do my fair share to support the organization. I will continue to do so.

However, the reversal of policy at the national level and local support by the FedEx MEC has greatly disappointed me. Each and every airline pilot that signed on to this profession knew the rules on Age 60 from the start. The excuses will continue to mount and the bandwagon is getting full.

The AGE 65 legislative process has proved divisive and will continue that direction for a long time. There are many compelling viewpoints on each side of the issue. Time to make some tough choices.

If the change does occur, the career progression across the spectrum will have far reaching effects on retirement, quality of life, and finances for EVERY pilot junior to those who continue past Age 60.

I will also support a recall of the leadership at the national and local level. In fact I pledge to be an integral part of the process. Talk is cheap, actions matter.

Consider the impact on you, your family, and your future -- vote accordingly with your hard earned $$$ and your recall ballot.

NKA
NoKoolAid is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 08:19 AM
  #336  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by Gooch121
And you use the date Nov 23, 06 for what reason?
That was the date ICAO changed to age 65, also the date the FAA approved Captains up to age 65, foreign pilots only.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:11 AM
  #337  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HazCan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: headbanging
Posts: 954
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter
That was the date ICAO changed to age 65, also the date the FAA approved Captains up to age 65, foreign pilots only.
I think you should go be a foreign pilot, then you can fly till 100 for all I care.
HazCan is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:32 AM
  #338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by HazCan
I think you should go be a foreign pilot, then you can fly till 100 for all I care.
No, as a US Citizen employed by a US carrier I expect the same rights granted foreign pilots. Looks like the FAA, Congress, and the American public agree.
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:38 AM
  #339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HazCan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: headbanging
Posts: 954
Default

Originally Posted by FoxHunter
No, as a US Citizen employed by a US carrier I expect the same rights granted foreign pilots. Looks like the FAA, Congress, and the American public agree.
That's great, you got the three groups with NO CLUE about aviation to agree with you. Good work.
HazCan is offline  
Old 05-11-2007, 10:56 AM
  #340  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by HazCan
That's great, you got the three groups with NO CLUE about aviation to agree with you. Good work.

What can I say??
FoxHunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjlavender
Major
26
10-19-2006 08:48 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
Diesel 10
Hangar Talk
4
07-20-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices