ALPA FDX (Part II)
#181
[Tony, why should any of us care who sues who? ]
Actually Tony, I never said or insinuated that YOU cared if we were sued. It was a rhetorical question. As for my conciousness, even after a fast moving whisley front blows through, I can still tell the difference between chicken sh1t and chicken salad. Since you put both a on the menu, that's a good thing to know.
Actually Tony, I never said or insinuated that YOU cared if we were sued. It was a rhetorical question. As for my conciousness, even after a fast moving whisley front blows through, I can still tell the difference between chicken sh1t and chicken salad. Since you put both a on the menu, that's a good thing to know.
#182
[Tony, why should any of us care who sues who? ]
Actually Tony, I never said or insinuated that YOU cared if we were sued. It was a rhetorical question. As for my conciousness, even after a fast moving whisley front blows through, I can still tell the difference between chicken sh1t and chicken salad. Since you put both a on the menu, that's a good thing to know.
Actually Tony, I never said or insinuated that YOU cared if we were sued. It was a rhetorical question. As for my conciousness, even after a fast moving whisley front blows through, I can still tell the difference between chicken sh1t and chicken salad. Since you put both a on the menu, that's a good thing to know.
#184
OHhhhhh. It was a rheTORical question. I get it.
See, you fooled me with the entire paragraph that you devoted to argue the rheTORical question. With each sentence, I became more convinced that it was a REAL question. You are such a tricky one, you are.
Shame on me. I'll have to be careful not to take you so seriously.
.
See, you fooled me with the entire paragraph that you devoted to argue the rheTORical question. With each sentence, I became more convinced that it was a REAL question. You are such a tricky one, you are.
Shame on me. I'll have to be careful not to take you so seriously.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post