Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Tax Equalization

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2007, 10:05 AM
  #1  
"blue collar thug"!
Thread Starter
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default Tax Equalization

From the website..

Q: How does the $82,000 annual tax exclusion relate to tax equalization? A: The objective of tax equalization is to provide the pilot with a "tax neutral" position as if he (she) remained stationed in the U.S. It is designed to yield neither a tax benefit nor loss to the employee for taking the assignment. Under tax equalization, the employee does not receive the $82,000 income exclusion, as would be the case if stationed in the US. The majority of pilots would incur a financial loss without the tax equalization mechanism regardless of the exclusion due to these factors:


If you go to CDG or HKG, you DO NOT remain in the USA. Therefore, YOU are entitled to the exclusion, not the company. Why in the heck should they get the benefit? Am I missing something here?
iarapilot is offline  
Old 07-19-2007, 10:07 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

It is a lot more then $82K if you add the housing exclusion. So make sure you justify no more then $2700 to the company.

Maybe the next round we can approach the company about an enhanced enhanced move package. Split the saving on Foreign Tax exclulusion and the company matches 50% of housing costs above $2700 (up to the IRS max for location) if the pilot agrees to meet the Foreign Income Exclusion rules. The company should agree to it as it will cost them almost nothing.

Two demerits this should be purple and orange.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 07-19-2007 at 10:28 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-19-2007, 03:08 PM
  #3  
"blue collar thug"!
Thread Starter
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

The point is that the pilot does not reap the benefit of the 82K+ exclusion. The company does. Which, in turn, dilutes the $$ they give you for housing. The exclusion, for an FO, amounts to around $30000 in your pocket per year. If the company gets that, which the pilot is entitled to, we actually end up paying the company. NQR!
iarapilot is offline  
Old 07-20-2007, 09:39 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: 767 Cap
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by iarapilot View Post
The point is that the pilot does not reap the benefit of the 82K+ exclusion. The company does. Which, in turn, dilutes the $$ they give you for housing. The exclusion, for an FO, amounts to around $30000 in your pocket per year. If the company gets that, which the pilot is entitled to, we actually end up paying the company. NQR!
Of course, the company uses that money to pay your HK or French tax bill, which is on your full salary (no exclusion) and the housing allowance. Boy, the company is making out, especially in France.
fdx727pilot is offline  
Old 07-20-2007, 11:49 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Liftr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
Default Let 'em eat SIBA

I keep seeing the phrase "Cost Neutral" used a lot. Let's do a little math and see what it would take to be cost neutral to SIBA.

$3,000 Airline tickets
$1,040 Per Diem x 15 days
$2,250 Hotel Expenses Estimate... 15 days x $150
$4,800 Increased Productivity... 4 more days flying = 6CH x 4days x $200hr
--------
$11,090

Am I missing something here?
Liftr is offline  
Old 07-21-2007, 06:53 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Yes, HK would double or triple a lot of those numbers.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 07-21-2007, 09:32 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
kronan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 2,418
Default

now, take it easy guys,
remember, no windfalls in the LOA----just ask Mgt or the MEC.
well, except for the ACP in Paris or Hong Kong, after-all, they possess special skills and need the ex-pat package to head over there.

hmm, wonder why the existing CBA isn't sufficient......for them, maybe they should go for the "enhanced" option if it becomes available next month.
kronan is offline  
Old 07-21-2007, 02:52 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Liftr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
Default

$133,080 The Cost of one pilot for one year of SIBA
$40,000 The proposed "benefit" offerred to each pilot under the LOA
----------
$.030 30 cents on the Dollar. That is what the Company and the MEC want us to believe is "Cost Neutral"

That sounds like a huge MBO bonus going to someone!
Liftr is offline  
Old 07-21-2007, 04:02 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

I'm not sure how you came up with those numbers...

The company is still going to have to pay for layover hotels. Yes, there will be layovers. Maybe, 30% less hotel nights? 30% of 13 days/mo = 4 hotel days.

4 hotel days at $150/day = $600 month


They will still have to pay per diem for those layover trips. I'll give em that.


You are way off the mark on the cost of SIBA D/Hs. I added every EUR SIBA lines D/H money(Eur only) and came up with this:

Total Aug Eur SIBA D/H costs(incl carryover D/H) is $176,061. Divided by 24 lines equals:

$7336 avg Eur SIBA monthly line D/H cost.

Of course, they will still need to D/H crews around Europe. So, I'll give them $1000/month for that.


Also, if you examine the SIBA trips...You'll find that a pure Eur SIBA line has about 6 actual duty periods per month, on average. Nearly every 72hr+/- Aug SIBA pairing, works 6 duty periods. That's 6 actual, revenue generating, work days per month!!! I'm not sure what our domestic average is...But, I would guess somewhere around 12 to 13 days of actual work. I would think the optimizer will be able to get nearly the same out of the FDAs. So, that would be 6 days+/-, per month, of productivity gain for the company.

6 days @ 6hrs X $220 = $7920 per Capt


I figure the total company cost savings to be:

Hotel savings ----- $ 600
D/H savings ------- $6336
Productivity gains - $7920

Total ------------- $14,856/month

That's about $180,000 per year per captain. Cost neutral? Are you kidding? I have no idea what the tax equalization plan will cost the company...But, I'm pretty confident it isn't going to be $180,000/year per captain, minus the $40,000 "benefit".

And, that's based on a 28 day month. The actual number would be higher when the four 5 week months are figured in.

Still a big NO here.

Last edited by Busboy; 07-21-2007 at 07:01 PM. Reason: math skills
Busboy is offline  
Old 07-21-2007, 04:41 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Liftr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 99
Default

Busboy,

Thanks for doing the research and filling in the details. I made some pretty conservative estimates. I was just trying to point out how far off the mark the LOA is on being "Cost Neutral".

I believe the Company has a lot of room ($) to come back to the negotiating table with after we all vote NO!

For me to consider an FDA assignment, my checkbook is going to need to show some black ink.

No way in he11 am I going to HKG and operate in red ink, just so Fred can move up the bilionaire list!
Liftr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hook
Cargo
6
07-18-2007 08:46 PM
iarapilot
Cargo
16
07-09-2007 06:37 AM
Beertini
Cargo
361
07-07-2007 12:56 AM
Darby67
Major
2
03-05-2006 06:52 AM
SWAjet
Money Talk
0
03-30-2005 10:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices