Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Transoceanic Experience for FDX/UPS >

Transoceanic Experience for FDX/UPS

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Transoceanic Experience for FDX/UPS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2007, 06:36 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
viktorbravo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Capt: Lav Truck
Posts: 288
Default

Originally Posted by Packer Backer View Post
I don't think the requirement is about just the crossing itself. But flying into some countries requires a lot more planning and experience than going from ORD to YYZ. Try flying from US to someplace in Russia. Or flying into Turkey with a Greece overflight. And I haven't even touched the complexities of State Rules and noise abatement procedures.
there are no secret handshakes required to do the stuff you are talking about. Yes, some gotchas if you dont pay attention or read the notes on the Jepps. There has long been confusion of procedures in the Nicosia FIR on the CGN - DXB route (not a crossing), and even the "experienced" folks screwed it up, but its only a matter of paying attention and reading the damn charts to get it right.

Oceanic crossings are VERY straight forward NAT, NOPAC (even on G212), WPAC, etc. I have not flown L888 so I cant comment on that, but I'm willing to bet that its straight forward and doesnt require a trio of sky gods to fly it. Once coasted out, crossings have a pretty low workload.

Yes, some of what you mention is more "work" than flying in the US, but not more difficult. Read the damn charts and pay attention, thats all.

Also the requirement IMO is there mostly because they can require it and still get plenty of qualified folks to apply in todays job market.

Last edited by viktorbravo; 07-27-2007 at 06:52 AM.
viktorbravo is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 06:36 AM
  #22  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
As well, at that time we not only did standard position reports, but we also did position plotting, until someone realized that the FMS's and GPS's that were used to present "the magenta line" was the same nav aids that showed us our position.
Until someone screwed it up and now we do plotting again.


We then stopped plotting. Pacific crossings were not required as they were very straightforward. Good luck!
Because the airways don't change daily!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 06:41 AM
  #23  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by viktorbravo View Post
I have not flown L888 so I cant comment on that, but I'm willing to bet that its straight forward and doesnt require a trio of sky gods to fly it.
I've heard it doesn't take a sky god to divert and land at one of those chinese diverts along L888 after losing data link!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 07:00 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
viktorbravo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Capt: Lav Truck
Posts: 288
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
I've heard it doesn't take a sky god to divert and land at one of those chinese diverts along L888 after losing data link!
Nor does it take one to figure out how to divert from BOM to KHI when the real alternate AMD had been closed for a month.
viktorbravo is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 08:11 AM
  #25  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by viktorbravo View Post
Nor does it take one to figure out how to divert from BOM to KHI when the real alternate AMD had been closed for a month.
Yikes, hadn't heard that one!
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 01:21 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Makes sure you call Tehran Center and Iran Air Defense when flying over Iran. And keep looking out the window for bottle rockets headed towards your plane.
FliFast is offline  
Old 07-27-2007, 07:54 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Packer Backer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by FliFast View Post
Makes sure you call Tehran Center and Iran Air Defense when flying over Iran. And keep looking out the window for bottle rockets headed towards your plane.
Now pair that newly upgraded MD11 Captain, that used to be a 727 or DC8 FO that has never flown international, up with a new hire from any US regional.
Packer Backer is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 09:02 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: A cushion seat
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy View Post
I got mine flying over Lake Michigan.

Just kidding!
Hey, doing that in a C-152 at night is no joke! I never knew how long that engine really is.
PAX2Cargo is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 09:31 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
15789's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: EMB 145 Capt.
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by Packer Backer View Post
Now pair that newly upgraded MD11 Captain, that used to be a 727 or DC8 FO that has never flown international, up with a new hire from any US regional.
Didn't you answer that question in a previous post??


Originally Posted by Packer Backer
I don't think the requirement is about just the crossing itself. But flying into some countries requires a lot more planning and experience than going from ORD to YYZ. Try flying from US to someplace in Russia. Or flying into Turkey with a Greece overflight. And I haven't even touched the complexities of State Rules and noise abatement procedures.

I think that the real answer here is just that, Receiving the training necessary to safely overfly those countries-NOT slamming the backgrounds of the crews who may be flying those routes.
15789 is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 10:07 AM
  #30  
Gets Off
 
md11phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Nordskog Industries Field Technician
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Pacific crossings were not required as they were very straightforward. Good luck!
Tell that to the MEM FOs who don't understand the difference between a compulsory waypoint and non-compulsory waypoint. Talk about sounding like amateurs on the radio.

We're jacks of all trades, masters of none.
md11phlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dittidano
Flight Schools and Training
21
03-06-2008 05:41 AM
KiloAlpha
Major
17
03-11-2006 01:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices