![]() |
Originally Posted by SleepyF18
(Post 203862)
I answer them in hubturns and in messages and emails. We are working on answering others in messages to the members. I have tried to answer all that has been asked in hubturns and emails. Ask Albie, FDXLAG, hfp, prezbear, afw-md11, micro, etc.
I cannot get into debates on here. I have given you a venue to ask your questions, and I will answer them honestly and truthfully, all that I ask is that you call for more indepth answers. 1) Post industry comparisons (Cathay, etc.) to show the justification for the numbers. Here is one to start I just saw that has merit... |
Originally Posted by 42GO
(Post 203864)
Do you want to guess what percentage of the crew force is present in these "limited" engagements? I doubt if you have addressed over 10% of the crewforce, and I am being generous. NOT because they don't want to but because they are working in another domicile, another country or live someplace other than the HUB. Why don't you give the rest of us a break and quit using the "hubturn meetings" as your only venue. This medium reaches far more people even if they don't respond.
|
Ok Sleepy, I appreciate your effort. My point is this. There are at least 20-30 well thought out questions about this LOA on this forum. I applaud U for getting on here and trying to address a few. You have my vote. But what you need to do is comb this forum for the many unanswered questions and ask the MEC to address them. Not just me on the telephone. I'm just one of the many and the tidal wave is growing. You better get a surf board. Thanks for being here but you should be asking what do we need to put in the next LOA for you to vote for. In the mean time if you dont agree with the rank and file, then live with your self
|
Shameless plug attempt
Originally Posted by SleepyF18
(Post 203862)
I cannot get into debates on here. I have given you a venue to ask your questions, and I will answer them honestly and truthfully, all that I ask is that you call for more indepth answers.
Not saying you would b/c it is completely your choice, but you could engage in a debate if this discussion were on the ALPA boards instead of APC correct? |
Originally Posted by SleepyF18
(Post 203865)
I am offering those that are on here a venue to get their questions answered, nothing more, nothing less. I view this is another way for members to get their questions answered via direct contact.
You can take your choice and answer them as you can....All we want is some answers from the ones who should have some answers. 1) Post industry comparisons (Cathay, etc.) to show the justification for the numbers. Why not start here it is a good question.... 2) why was that committee chair fired or replaced....I know from others who have been given the boot that this is an all too common practice with no accountability to the membership and usually no explanation. |
Sleepy,
You are doing a stand up job, but disagreements on answers are still happening. Let me quote Jack: Even though the voting period is open for the FDA LOA, there are still many good questions being asked, and ALPA and the Company have been attempting to answer them as they occur. In a few cases, the questions have made both sides go back and rethink areas that were never discussed or have implications never considered. This is the value of having a month to review the LOA before voting and evidences the difficulty in constructing LOAs. As far as us peons know the company has not answered questions as they occur but only once and nothing since. You and I disagree on DH pay; we both have opinions. Why is it so hard to get something in writing? What has been the result of the rethinking? Obviously it will have some impact on the LOA; shouldn't all members find out in writing from our union before the vote closes. Dosen't the Bold sentence indicate that maybe we all rushed into this? I understand ALPA's lawyers are on retainer not hourly workers, what is their advantage to slow leaking answers? |
Originally Posted by 42GO
(Post 203881)
2) why was that committee chair fired or replaced....I know from others who have been given the boot that this is an all too common practice with no accountability to the membership and usually no explanation.
|
Originally Posted by Daniel Larusso
(Post 203868)
Sleepy,
Not saying you would b/c it is completely your choice, but you could engage in a debate if this discussion were on the ALPA boards instead of APC correct? |
Originally Posted by 42GO
(Post 203881)
1) Post industry comparisons (Cathay, etc.) to show the justification for the numbers. Why not start here it is a good question....
|
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 203945)
Sleepy,
You are doing a stand up job, but disagreements on answers are still happening. Let me quote Jack: Even though the voting period is open for the FDA LOA, there are still many good questions being asked, and ALPA and the Company have been attempting to answer them as they occur. In a few cases, the questions have made both sides go back and rethink areas that were never discussed or have implications never considered. This is the value of having a month to review the LOA before voting and evidences the difficulty in constructing LOAs. As far as us peons know the company has not answered questions as they occur but only once and nothing since. You and I disagree on DH pay; we both have opinions. Why is it so hard to get something in writing? What has been the result of the rethinking? Obviously it will have some impact on the LOA; shouldn't all members find out in writing from our union before the vote closes. Dosen't the Bold sentence indicate that maybe we all rushed into this? I understand ALPA's lawyers are on retainer not hourly workers, what is their advantage to slow leaking answers? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:00 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands