Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
My NC Speaks for Me. I voted YES. >

My NC Speaks for Me. I voted YES.

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

My NC Speaks for Me. I voted YES.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2007, 10:49 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by a300fr8dog View Post
Carlos,

"If". Your first word is: IF. And for many, the perception is that this thing just wasn't well thought out, by FDX or our negotiators. But the real rub is in the idea that BC, et al, didn't do their homework.
Thanks for using the word "perception," because it typifies the comments I see frequently. You say they didn't do their homework (I guess you're speaking for yourself, too, and not just the "perception"). I think it's impossible to read (or re-read) all the communications you've received from the MEC and reach such a breezy conclusion. It looks to me like everyone involved knows there are gains we couldn't get this time around, but, on balance, the positives far outweigh the negatives. I have no reason to question anyone's preparation.
Carlos Abundis is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 10:54 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Carlos Abundis View Post
Actually, I was alluding to the fact that JL has proven to be a straight-shooter. I would take him at his word.
You couldn't have crystallized directly negotiating with the pilot group any better. Would you mind providing a picture that I could put next to this in wiki?
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 10:54 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Default

"Here's why the company cannot renegotiate the LOA terms."

You want to roll the dice against those odds?


Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
When I got nothing to lose I roll them dice every time.
We've all got something to lose here.
Carlos Abundis is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:02 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2005 Blues's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ANC -11 FO
Posts: 189
Default

Still waiting, Carlos.
2005 Blues is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:07 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptainMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FDX A300 CPT
Posts: 967
Default

Originally Posted by Carlos Abundis View Post
1.) I don’t want to take money off the table for those pilots who want to take advantage of the opportunity to man these foreign domiciles. 2.) Now is the time to accept the improvements in scope and make it as likely as possible that our business grows with OUR PILOTS - not contract foreign pilots - at the controls; on our next CBA, we can use our experience and leverage to make up for actual deficiencies.

i aplaud your post knowing you be be crucified by some..anyway the only reason i would change my vote is the careful consideration of your 2 points...the money that was put aside for us in the postal debacle (somewhere around $40mill/yr) went into the pockets of management as bonuses and still does....that is a fact!...the money in this case will go the same place and i have been told that...also i have buds wanting to bid these places and want the $2700...and they are going anyway..still thinking
CaptainMark is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:09 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Smile

Originally Posted by Daniel Larusso View Post
You couldn't have crystallized directly negotiating with the pilot group any better. Would you mind providing a picture that I could put next to this in wiki?
You may not trust JL. OK. How about the NC who negotiated this deal on our behalf? No? How about anyone on the MEC who voted for the LOA? No again? It must be a lonely feeling to have no one (except one Subic pilot) working on your behalf that you can trust.

Last edited by Carlos Abundis; 07-28-2007 at 11:34 AM. Reason: Removed unwarranted criticism.
Carlos Abundis is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:14 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 329
Default

Originally Posted by Carlos Abundis View Post
You may not trust JL. OK. How about the NC who negotiated this deal on our behalf? No? How about anyone on the MEC who voted for the LOA? No again? It must be a lonely feeling to have no one (except one Subic pilot) working on your behalf that you can trust.

Do you wake at night when the black helicopters hover over your house? Or have you gotten used to it?
You make a post certain to inflame passions and use false assertions to support your position. Then, rather than countering with cogent arguments, you flame away. I look forward to your opinions on this LOA, but only if you base them in fact. You haven't done that yet.
av8rmike is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:16 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
You think those were Jack's words? That thing went through a chop chain and was most likely written and/or rewritten for him. As someone mentioned elsewhere on this forum, not enough typos and fat fingering for it to be Jack's words.
That did stand out to me, too. Must be some kind of advanced-technology spell/grammar checker involved there.
Carlos Abundis is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:18 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by av8rmike View Post
You make a post certain to inflame passions and use false assertions to support your position. Then, rather than countering with cogent arguments, you flame away. I look forward to your opinions on this LOA, but only if you base them in fact. You haven't done that yet.
You're right, the black helicopter thing was a bit much. I apologize, DL.
Carlos Abundis is offline  
Old 07-28-2007, 11:23 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 329
Default

Originally Posted by 2005 Blues View Post
Still waiting, Carlos.
You won't get an answer. There isn't an honest, fact-based response to your request. To assert this LOA improves our Scope clause has no basis in reality.
av8rmike is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices