FDX Nov07 Disputed Pairs
10-30-2007, 05:27 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Originally Posted by MaydayMark
Well ... I'm impressed with "O's" email today. He says he's working to resolve these issues and flies these Airbus DP's himself. He says he intends to have other RCP's fly them also.
I really like what he's saying ... I hope he can fix them. Good for him for trying (assuming he's serious and really WANTS to fix them).
Maybe the jury is still out on the new SCP and he'll turn out to be watching out for our best interests after all. I say we give him a chance and see what he can do!
Mark
I really like what he's saying ... I hope he can fix them. Good for him for trying (assuming he's serious and really WANTS to fix them).
Maybe the jury is still out on the new SCP and he'll turn out to be watching out for our best interests after all. I say we give him a chance and see what he can do!
Mark
As far as the ALPA resolution, I think a more constructive approach would be to work on figuring out a better way to let guys know which pairings are disputed. AOC postings, locker stuffing, flags on VIPS, etc. For some reason, the emails are not working with 100% success. I continue to read about guys not receiving them or pleading ignorance. I think we should come up with a way that's excuse proof for the guys who choose to fly them.
10-30-2007, 06:16 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Originally Posted by Deuce130
As far as the ALPA resolution, I think a more constructive approach would be to work on figuring out a better way to let guys know which pairings are disputed. AOC postings, locker stuffing, flags on VIPS, etc. .
10-30-2007, 12:31 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
All ready gone
MD11 ANC: 22,74,83,86,88,89
#22: Flying 3/4 of the way around the world to SFS before the only reset is much too late to be effective.
#74: Three body clock swaps in five days is excessive. No reset before the hard work.
Trip 22 ANC 11 2Dec
Trip 74 ANC 11 12Nov
Amazing!
10-30-2007, 01:22 PM
#35
...Whatever It Is!
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Originally Posted by FlybyKnite
10-30-2007, 01:29 PM
#36
...Whatever It Is!
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Originally Posted by FlybyKnite
Both seats in 110 taken and working with our buddy that picked up 2010.
Both seats in 118 taken.
And the above RFO pairings taken.
11-01-2007, 12:18 PM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Row well and live...
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by Cujo
MD11 ANC: 22,74,83,86,88,89
#22: Flying 3/4 of the way around the world to SFS before the only reset is much too late to be effective.
#74: Three body clock swaps in five days is excessive. No reset before the hard work.
Trip 22 ANC 11 2Dec
Trip 74 ANC 11 12Nov
Amazing!
I know this because one of those numbers now has my name on it.
11-01-2007, 12:56 PM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Great White North
Posts: 391
Originally Posted by cma2407
Careful here. These trips may be "already gone", but since open time hasn't come out yet, it wasn't thru a voluntary trade. So there is at least one good reason: they've been assigned to Nov secondary line holders. And not by choice.
I know this because one of those numbers now has my name on it.
I know this because one of those numbers now has my name on it.
...but then again, I could be wrong.
Cheers
11-01-2007, 01:32 PM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 1,395
Originally Posted by cma2407
Careful here. These trips may be "already gone", but since open time hasn't come out yet, it wasn't thru a voluntary trade. So there is at least one good reason: they've been assigned to Nov secondary line holders. And not by choice.
I know this because one of those numbers now has my name on it.
I know this because one of those numbers now has my name on it.
5. If there are pairings that remain disputed after meeting with
the SCP or his designee, the following process shall apply
to each bid pack which contains disputed pairings for the
immediately upcoming bid period only:
a. If the number of remaining disputed pairings in a
particular bid pack does not exceed 5% of the total
number of pairings in that bid pack, the disputed
pairings shall not be included on bid lines without SIG
approval. Such pairings shall appear in open time and
shall be available for ordinary open time assignment or
for placement on a VTO or custom line if specifically requested by a pilot holding such line.
Well, if you didn't ask for a disputed pairing and you received one on your VTO line, I'd be on the telephone to my ACP immediately. If you go into VIPS, you can call up your secondary line request worksheet and check it again to make sure.
the SCP or his designee, the following process shall apply
to each bid pack which contains disputed pairings for the
immediately upcoming bid period only:
a. If the number of remaining disputed pairings in a
particular bid pack does not exceed 5% of the total
number of pairings in that bid pack, the disputed
pairings shall not be included on bid lines without SIG
approval. Such pairings shall appear in open time and
shall be available for ordinary open time assignment or
for placement on a VTO or custom line if specifically requested by a pilot holding such line.
Well, if you didn't ask for a disputed pairing and you received one on your VTO line, I'd be on the telephone to my ACP immediately. If you go into VIPS, you can call up your secondary line request worksheet and check it again to make sure.
Last edited by FDXer; 11-01-2007 at 01:34 PM. Reason: format
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
