FDX Nov07 Disputed Pairs
11-15-2007, 01:38 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 1,395
Since the new SIG letter should be out anytime soon, I'm going to let this thread drift down the page. If someone produces a list of the December DPS when they are announced, I'll put the list at the top of the forum page. No names please--just trip numbers and dates by airplane.
11-18-2007, 10:32 AM
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Anyone care to explain why this trip was not a DP for Nov?
https://pilot.fedex.com/vips-bin/vip...5?MEM?11?13Nov
Looks to me like the the CDG - STN - MEM leg should have been disputed.
Also if we/the SIG thinks this sequence will ever be changed we are kidding ourselves. This problem should have been fixed in the last contract but we did not do it. They keep adding this type of flight and we will see more in the future. PVG - ICN -ANC is another, that was added post contract and now we fly it all the time.
While I agree this is the improper use of a RFO, I would rather fly this sequence than many of the other domestic trips that are not disputed.
https://pilot.fedex.com/vips-bin/vip...5?MEM?11?13Nov
Looks to me like the the CDG - STN - MEM leg should have been disputed.
Also if we/the SIG thinks this sequence will ever be changed we are kidding ourselves. This problem should have been fixed in the last contract but we did not do it. They keep adding this type of flight and we will see more in the future. PVG - ICN -ANC is another, that was added post contract and now we fly it all the time.
While I agree this is the improper use of a RFO, I would rather fly this sequence than many of the other domestic trips that are not disputed.
11-18-2007, 11:40 AM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 777 F/O
Posts: 340
Originally Posted by USMCFDX
Anyone care to explain why this trip was not a DP for Nov?
https://pilot.fedex.com/vips-bin/vip...5?MEM?11?13Nov
Looks to me like the the CDG - STN - MEM leg should have been disputed.
Also if we/the SIG thinks this sequence will ever be changed we are kidding ourselves. This problem should have been fixed in the last contract but we did not do it. They keep adding this type of flight and we will see more in the future. PVG - ICN -ANC is another, that was added post contract and now we fly it all the time.
While I agree this is the improper use of a RFO, I would rather fly this sequence than many of the other domestic trips that are not disputed.
https://pilot.fedex.com/vips-bin/vip...5?MEM?11?13Nov
Looks to me like the the CDG - STN - MEM leg should have been disputed.
Also if we/the SIG thinks this sequence will ever be changed we are kidding ourselves. This problem should have been fixed in the last contract but we did not do it. They keep adding this type of flight and we will see more in the future. PVG - ICN -ANC is another, that was added post contract and now we fly it all the time.
While I agree this is the improper use of a RFO, I would rather fly this sequence than many of the other domestic trips that are not disputed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
