Top Ten ways to figure out if you are flying with someone over 60

Subscribe
6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
Page 10 of 12
Go to
Quote: I don't know I just don't see Captains as great as guys like JJ do. Being a former military guy I see the cockpit a bit more as two guys working together with one guy getting 51% of the vote (at least that's the way it is in the Navy). I've rarely flown with Captains that are all that impressive in the jet - most have decent landings, don't understand PROF that well and make just about an equal amount of mistakes (albeit small) that the FOs make and both do a good job of backing each other up. Furthermore I haven't heard about too many accidents where the Captain took all the heat and the FO got off scott free. If you're very lucky, the Captain might know the right way to get to the Ramp Office at the odd outstation or know the procedures for check in internationally but outside of that I don't see a huge amount of difference. That being said I fully respect their authority as the one "signing" for the jet and the one far more senior and therefore gets paid a lot more. I just don't see them quite as high and might as JJ does. Please enlighten me.
I sure hope I get to fly with Tuck soon. Think of all the stuff I could learn from him after 12 years in the airplane! I always thought I understood PROF but maybe Tuck can explain it to me better?

Mark
Reply
I've rarely flown with Captains that are all that impressive in the jet - most have decent landings, don't understand PROF that well

PROF is for pu$$ies!
Reply
On my second flight out of IOE (in the MD-11) we were going from Memphis to Oakland, landing RW29. My leg, and I landed at the far end of the touchdown zone. The tower asked if we could make the first high speed and my F/O immediately, without asking, said "Yes". Needless to say we not only didn't make the first highspeed, we also didn't make the second one, and rolled to the end. On taxi-back, I asked him what the speed requirement was for a high speed turnoff. He responded 40 Knots. I asked where he had gotten that bit of little known information, and he said "that's what everyone uses." Again I asked him where he had gotten the 40 knots from and he responded the Limitations Section. Of course he was wrong. I then asked him how long he'd been on the MD-11. "9 years" he responded. Right then and there I decided that if I ever wanted to know a limitation or limit on a jet, I'd never ask someone who had been on the jet a long time. Someones book knowledge, in my opinion, is inversely proportional to the amount of time that person is on a specific jet. If I want to know a "book answer", I ask someone whose recently out of training.

As for captains that are "impressive in the jet", when I was an F/O, I always graded myself on my takeoffs and landings, but once I upgraded to the left seat, I paid less attention to that aspect of the job (ie, takeoffs and landings), and concentrated (and graded myself) on the many other aspects of moving the jet from point A to point B. I think that takeoffs and landings are important, but for a captain, there's many more important issues that go hand in hand with conducting good flight operations.
Reply
I don't suppose any of the pro 65 people wrote the Pentagon or their Congress "Person" and demanded to be a fighter pilot until they turned 65?

No, I didn't think so, shooting your watch can't compare to flying rubber dog poop out of Hong Kong.
Reply
Quote: I don't suppose any of the pro 65 people wrote the Pentagon or their Congress "Person" and demanded to be a fighter pilot until they turned 65?

No, I didn't think so, shooting your watch can't compare to flying rubber dog poop out of Hong Kong.
You see no difference between flying commercial aircraft in a 1 G environment and flying fighter aircraft in a high G environment? That's not to say it can't be done, but why would anyone want to punish themselves that much.
Reply
Quote: You see no difference between flying commercial aircraft in a 1 G environment and flying fighter aircraft in a high G environment? That's not to say it can't be done, but why would anyone want to punish themselves that much.

After 17 years in the Eagle my back hurts ALL the time. My neck has that gravel sound when I roll over at night. I will miss it when that time occurs, but my body will thank me.
Reply
Quote: On my second flight out of IOE (in the MD-11) we were going from Memphis to Oakland, landing RW29. My leg, and I landed at the far end of the touchdown zone. The tower asked if we could make the first high speed and my F/O immediately, without asking, said "Yes". Needless to say we not only didn't make the first highspeed, we also didn't make the second one, and rolled to the end. On taxi-back, I asked him what the speed requirement was for a high speed turnoff. He responded 40 Knots. I asked where he had gotten that bit of little known information, and he said "that's what everyone uses." Again I asked him where he had gotten the 40 knots from and he responded the Limitations Section. Of course he was wrong. I then asked him how long he'd been on the MD-11. "9 years" he responded. Right then and there I decided that if I ever wanted to know a limitation or limit on a jet, I'd never ask someone who had been on the jet a long time. Someones book knowledge, in my opinion, is inversely proportional to the amount of time that person is on a specific jet. If I want to know a "book answer", I ask someone whose recently out of training.

As for captains that are "impressive in the jet", when I was an F/O, I always graded myself on my takeoffs and landings, but once I upgraded to the left seat, I paid less attention to that aspect of the job (ie, takeoffs and landings), and concentrated (and graded myself) on the many other aspects of moving the jet from point A to point B. I think that takeoffs and landings are important, but for a captain, there's many more important issues that go hand in hand with conducting good flight operations.
JJ,
I agree with everything you say. I have seen folks who have atrophied in their seat, as well as others who have flourished. It's always been particularly fun for me to fly with a new Capt right out of IOE as it always caused the "give a sh-t meter" to move noticably as well as the inevitable re-examination of info you thought was a given.
However, there is a continuation. I recently flew with a Capt who had 9 years in the right seat, and 1.5 in the left. Now we only did two legs and it could have been just a bad couple of days, however I stayed on my toes as the Capt made some real JV type errors / lack of systems knowledge buffoonery.
The bottom line is a true professional will work to stay "on their game" regardless of which seat they sit in.
Biff

A good wingman knows his place: Twoop, Mayday, Lead your on fire, Bingo, I've got mine, you've got the fat one!
Reply
"You see no difference between flying commercial aircraft in a 1 G environment and flying fighter aircraft in a high G environment?"

After age 60, I see no difference, well actually I do see one, the pay check. Bottom line, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Reply
Quote: However, there is a continuation. I recently flew with a Capt who had 9 years in the right seat, and 1.5 in the left. Now we only did two legs and it could have been just a bad couple of days, however I stayed on my toes as the Capt made some real JV type errors / lack of systems knowledge buffoonery.
You fly with me?
Reply
Quote: I was thinking of another now-gone event.. the oral. I mean the engineering oral. At my old house, temps and pressures were part of the oral and one of the ground instructors on the 727 just got excited (no pun intended) when we got the the electrical system. Not just 'protect essential' but arcane stuff like how the R-47 holding relay decided which power source it used for essential.

When I got my FE ticket, we used pirated Delta manuals and when I went for the oral with the Feds, the POI was assigned to Eastern. After a few questions about the electrical system, I drew out the systems. He said, "That's not correct.. you have the DC busses drawn incorrectly." I said, "I think not.. but let's check it." We found out the Delta -232s were wired differently from the Eastern -225s.

All I can say is I am glad I didn't have to draw out the schematic for the SECs and ELACs on the 'bus.
III,

Just to add to your post, TWA's 727s were model -31 and -231 (Stubbies and Stretches). With our legend, Gordon Granger everything on TWA's 727 (switches) were all backwards from all the rest of the 727s in the world.

Check Essential- The Capt. would say if I see the red light you owe me a beer.


FF
Reply
6  7  8  9  10  11  12 
Page 10 of 12
Go to