Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Our Best Furlough Bargaining Chip >

Our Best Furlough Bargaining Chip

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Our Best Furlough Bargaining Chip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2007, 09:24 PM
  #21  
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD-11, old man
Posts: 2,198
Default

Originally Posted by MAWK90 View Post
ALBIE, I draw the line there pal! What's wrong with wanking to porn in your hotel room!????
CNN International Weather presenter Mari Ramos is my favorite, AND it's FREE!
fbh
frozenboxhauler is offline  
Old 12-30-2007, 09:35 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DiamondZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by frozenboxhauler View Post
AND it's FREE!
fbh
Spoken like a true pilot.
DiamondZ is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:37 AM
  #23  
Slainge Var'
 
AerisArmis's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Zeppelin Tail Gunner
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by Precontact View Post
UPS threatened it in 2003...some guys took early retirements and it was cancelled.
Bingo! If we are overmanned, then offer early retirement (without penalty)to an age group, say 57-60, or a seniority group, say 20-25 TOS. Any takers will free up a slot for our beloved Foxhunter and the rest of his merry men.
AerisArmis is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:13 AM
  #24  
On Reserve
 
XUSair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 18
Default

CBA addresses this in section 23........

C. Incentive Plan
The Company may, at its option, elect to avoid or mitigate a furlough by offering pilots or a specific group of pilots (using age or seniority, unless the Association consents to an alternate selection criteria) voluntary early retirement and/or severance package. If made to a specific group of pilots, any offer shall be made on a uniform and non-discriminatory basis. The Company shall notify, meet and consult with the Association prior to making any offer pursuant to this paragraph

They can even target the over 60 crownd as a "specific group"
XUSair is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:24 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default Yet more proof we are in big trouble...

From our own website--AOD today:

Record volumes

On Monday the 17th, the Company experienced the busiest night in its history! We processed more than 11.4 million packages through our worldwide networks, beating the existing record of 9.8 million packages.

Our Chairman and President, Fred Smith, tells us, “As an engine of the global economy, FedEx relies on the incredible dedication of our global workforce of more than 280,000 team members to deliver the holidays for our customers. The continued growth of FedEx is a testament to the commitment of our people, to the unprecedented access we give our customers and to the reliability of our unmatched global networks."


An overmanning bubble? Maybe. A crisis? I don't think so. C'mon ALPA--hang tough on this one. Let's keep our wits and work together.
Albief15 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:31 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by MAWK90 View Post
ALBIE, I draw the line there pal! What's wrong with wanking to porn in your hotel room!????

Hey please just don't hit the remote. I might get assigned that room after you check out. Great now I have to request that I not get a room from one of the Fed-ex guys.
HeavyJet is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 07:49 AM
  #27  
On Reserve
 
XUSair's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A300 F/O
Posts: 18
Default The sky is not falling

PC is not going to furlough because he is a nice guy or his daughter is 22 from the bottom, he is not going to furlough because of your CBA.......

b. The minimum bid period guarantee shall be reduced to a minimum of 48/60 CH before any pilot is furloughed. At least a full bid period must follow the announcement of this action. This provision shall only be used to prevent or delay a furlough.

If we were to reduce to 48/60 CH, we would need to hire pilots. This is posturing to fill the FDA's under a subpar LOA. The sky is not falling here people. Spead the word to the uniformed sheep out there flying the line and maybe we can give our union the fortitude to stand tall on this one.
Taking a paycut to help fund the return of the over 60 crowd is another story.

Last edited by XUSair; 12-31-2007 at 08:01 AM.
XUSair is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:24 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
subicpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: A300CAP
Posts: 479
Default

I hear a lot of guys say that if we reduce the BLG to 48/60, that we would need to hire pilots. I'm not a rocket surgeon, but it seems to me that lowering the BLG just redistributes the flying over a larger group of pilots. You have to assume that the reason the BLG is going down is because there are too many pilots to do the existing flying. Lowering the BLG allows more lines to be built with less flying on each line, so everyone works and we don't have to furlough. If I'm off on this, someone please feel free to set me straight. Thanks.
subicpilot is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:28 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

When they (we) say they would have to hire pilots it is metaphoric since you would not expect furlough and hiring at the same time. The point is the company would need a lot more bodies if the current BLG was limited to 48 a month.

I guess the point is our minimum Bid Line Guarantee (For Vagabond) is 68 hours. The company would like something less (in some fleets). The Union's ultimate Hard Ball tactic would be to say fine furlough someone. At which time the Min BLG would go to 48 (IMO) and the company would have trouble meeting its schedule.

And no I do not think a furlough is likely as they have provided us written notice of their intention not to furlough.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 12-31-2007 at 09:36 AM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 09:30 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fedupbusdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A300/310 Capt
Posts: 1,642
Default

Originally Posted by subicpilot View Post
I hear a lot of guys say that if we reduce the BLG to 48/60, that we would need to hire pilots. I'm not a rocket surgeon, but it seems to me that lowering the BLG just redistributes the flying over a larger group of pilots. You have to assume that the reason the BLG is going down is because there are too many pilots to do the existing flying. Lowering the BLG allows more lines to be built with less flying on each line, so everyone works and we don't have to furlough. If I'm off on this, someone please feel free to set me straight. Thanks.

It would redistribute the flying to a group of pilots larger than we have now.
We still have to fly our system form, ie we must still fly to all of the cities that we currently service at the rate that we currently service them. I don't think Fedex will go tell Omaha, Flint, Spokane and Tuscon, sorry you cannot have Fedex service anymore, we have too many pilots.....
fedupbusdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Regional
0
12-25-2007 10:00 PM
Flea Bite
Major
4
03-02-2006 12:27 PM
Gordon C
Regional
5
05-30-2005 11:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices