FDX R24 assignment?

Reply Subscribe

Page 3 of 3

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-30-2008 | 01:43 PM

#21

FDXLAG

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 8,047

Likes: 0

From: 767 FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Abuser

I guess you should be volunteering in the Enforcement Department then, eh? Since you know all the answers.

Not sure they would have me.

I stand by my response. Tell me what is wrong with it than you can criticize my union loyalty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FDXLAG

If he didn't know the correct response from a FDX MEC employee is I don't know but I will get back to you ASAP.

07-30-2008 | 01:55 PM

#22

ClutchCargo

Line Holder

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 889

Likes: 0

From: Retired FDX MD11 Capt

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD Abuser

As for putting crewmembers in as the Enforcement gurus, I recall that was how it was during the FPA days, and they did a great job in protecting our contract, didn't they????

If I recall correctly DT is a holdover from FPA. He was as worthless then as he is now.

I have had very good support from the other attorneys in the MEC offices,

07-30-2008 | 07:05 PM

#23

Gunter

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Aug 2006

Posts: 3,931

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by AFW_MD11

if I was spending money to retain legal counsel, I would hope that they WOULD be biased in my favor......but that's just me.

not to mention......that's just what we need - 4500 individuals with legal counsel on retainer looking out for 4500 individuals' vastly differing wants/needs/desires

vs. a unified group bargaining COLLECTIVELY.

but, hey.....as long as I get mine.....right?

O.K. poor choice of words. I meant an advocate. Someone not biased toward some agenda other than yours.

But I see you get my point...almost.

Do you think the over 60 crowd and the involuntary domicile move crowd just hoped for the best when they had issues? Hmmm. Good luck with that tactic.