Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Rumor Mill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2008 | 05:26 PM
  #81  
1800 RVR's Avatar
Next 24 hr layover…
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 538
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Slice
Or, they could fill the FO seats off the street without a bid. Then they only have to cover CA upgrades and the seats they vacate. No?
No, vacancies have to be put out for a bid to all crewmembers (with exception of probies - those awards need not be filled by the company). It is those vacancies that are left over after all the musical chairs is done that are filled by newhires.
Old 08-31-2008 | 05:29 PM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

All vacancies must be posted and crewmembers must be allowed to bid on prior to a new hire.

(confirmed by Brian Conley)
Old 08-31-2008 | 07:13 PM
  #83  
dudewannabe's Avatar
Thanks for the jumpseat!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 galley operator
Default

So how many slots will be vacant for 27 wide-bodies? What's their staffing model for the 767? Some aircraft would be retired due to the additional planes, no?

How many over-sixty guys are still in the F/E seat?
Old 08-31-2008 | 07:28 PM
  #84  
SaltyDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: Leftof longitudinal
Default

Originally Posted by dudewannabe
If I understand the bidding system correctly..The 767s will create "vacancies"...which will quickly be filled up by the ultra-senior over-60 folks who are yearning for the front seats?

Although there are nearly 30 A/Cs coming, I'm sure some of us will be able to cash in at some point towards the end of the deliveries.

Did I get it right? The whole UPS vacancies/realignment/displacement shuffling system is still a mystery to me.
DWB,
The ultra senior 60+ generally won't be able to cash in. Recall that once you are 63, UPS does not contractually have to train you (Bypass: Art 14.3)for a new seat. Also, since they took an upgrade from S/O to F/O or Capt, they incurred a 12 month transition freeze, same seat to seat incurs a 24 month transition freeze. (Art 14.E.2.c), Example: the 60+ year old 747-400 F/O's incurred a seat lock (Transistion Freeze). Very few of these folks just turned 60. Many by either transition freeze or natural age, will be beyond 63 next year when vacancies occur. This means that will be ineligible for recurring vacancies. (Seats opened up by the domino effect of displacements or original vacancies). They would be eligible for original vacancies, however, the age 63 clock still applies thus voiding for the majority (by company choice) their ability to train in a new seat. Thus, I see the opportunities for the rest of the group, generally benfitting the more junior. Most of the mid seniority folks are just not really in play unless they are looking for a life change. Generally low turnover though in these levels. (50% F/O for example). Also, the folks that are now turning 60 generally will sit where they are and will not change the shuffle (other than delay another upgrade for the next 5 years. ) In any case, the 767's showing up won't see many of the 60+ folks moving like we did with the original 74 vacancies and 74 legacy displacements. That one time event is over.
Old 08-31-2008 | 07:41 PM
  #85  
dudewannabe's Avatar
Thanks for the jumpseat!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 galley operator
Default

Originally Posted by SaltyDog
DWB,
The ultra senior 60+ generally won't be able to cash in. Recall that once you are 63, UPS does not contractually have to train you (Bypass: Art 14.3)for a new seat. Also, since they took an upgrade from S/O to F/O or Capt, they incurred a 12 month transition freeze, same seat to seat incurs a 24 month transition freeze. (Art 14.E.2.c), Example: the 60+ year old 747-400 F/O's incurred a seat lock (Transistion Freeze). Very few of these folks just turned 60. Many by either transition freeze or natural age, will be beyond 63 next year when vacancies occur. This means that will be ineligible for recurring vacancies. (Seats opened up by the domino effect of displacements or original vacancies). They would be eligible for original vacancies, however, the age 63 clock still applies thus voiding for the majority (by company choice) their ability to train in a new seat. Thus, I see the opportunities for the rest of the group, generally benfitting the more junior. Most of the mid seniority folks are just not really in play unless they are looking for a life change. Generally low turnover though in these levels. (50% F/O for example). Also, the folks that are now turning 60 generally will sit where they are and will not change the shuffle (other than delay another upgrade for the next 5 years. ) In any case, the 767's showing up won't see many of the 60+ folks moving like we did with the original 74 vacancies and 74 legacy displacements. That one time event is over.
SD,

Didn't the company say that they will train whomever that bids the front seat regardless of age?

I thought I heard someone posted something about a guy on IOE on the -400 that is 64 yrs old.
Old 08-31-2008 | 08:01 PM
  #86  
SaltyDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 0
From: Leftof longitudinal
Default

Originally Posted by dudewannabe
SD,

Didn't the company say that they will train whomever that bids the front seat regardless of age?

I thought I heard someone posted something about a guy on IOE on the -400 that is 64 yrs old.
No. There are a few 64 year olds going through training/IOE. The last bid the company posted stated that if you had not turned 64 by close of bid would be trained. I have my opinion why this more unusual position was taken for bid closing,etc, but it boils down to generally complying with the contract and a non precedent decision (IMO).
Old 08-31-2008 | 09:31 PM
  #87  
Waborita's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: 109% IPA
Question

I thought the 767's were being brought on to replace the DC-8's going into retirement?
I sure hope they lead to vacancies!
Old 09-01-2008 | 03:06 AM
  #88  
Roberto's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by dudewannabe
How many over-sixty guys are still in the F/E seat?
There are 42 over 60 and under-65 FE's remaining. Six of these will turn 65 in 2009. There are 46 over-60 FO's.
Old 09-01-2008 | 04:31 AM
  #89  
Capt TedStriker's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Left
Thumbs up Over 60....

Roberto,

In the future please use the words NEAR DEAD or FAVRE's for discussing the demographics of our over 60 crewmembers. If you are trying to be accurate with your data (which you have always have been)... this nomenclature adds further credence to your deductions.

Striker.

Last edited by Capt TedStriker; 09-01-2008 at 04:38 AM.
Old 09-01-2008 | 04:37 AM
  #90  
Charlie Murphy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Capt TedStriker
Roberto,

In the future please use the words NEAR DEAD or FARVE's for discussing the demographics of our over 60 crewmembers. If you are trying to be accurate with your data (which you have always have been)... this nomenclature adds further credence to your deductions.

Striker.
It's FAVRE. Spelling it correctly adds even further credence.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnnyPilot
Cargo
50
07-01-2009 10:08 AM
TipsyMcStagger
Cargo
56
08-13-2008 02:42 PM
Nashmd11
Cargo
101
08-05-2008 06:18 AM
overworked
Cargo
6
08-01-2008 05:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices