Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
GM Killing On-Demand Fr8 Ops? >

GM Killing On-Demand Fr8 Ops?

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

GM Killing On-Demand Fr8 Ops?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2008, 10:18 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Default

Originally Posted by say that again View Post
$175 per hour? Maybe for an F/O!
I think that decimal was a little off. Don't you mean $17.5 per hour, door closed to door open?
jedinein is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 01:11 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownClown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Brown ones
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Wouldn't have to save those cents on the plastic bolts if other costs were in line. It is too bad Chrysler didn't go bankrupt 30 years ago we might have a globally competitive auto industry.

I'm just curious where you think the golden parachutes and management bonuses come into play? The 3 CEO's in Detoilet made bonuses last year of between 23 and 32 million. The CEO of Toyota made 1 million. Maybe those costs need to be in line as well!
BrownClown is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 02:04 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by BrownClown View Post
I'm just curious where you think the golden parachutes and management bonuses come into play? The 3 CEO's in Detoilet made bonuses last year of between 23 and 32 million. The CEO of Toyota made 1 million. Maybe those costs need to be in line as well!

The difference between you and me is I say they are all at fault. President, congress, manglement and the UAW. You obviously see no problem with 2500 per vehicle cost that has nothing to do with production of said vehicle.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 02:25 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BrownClown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Brown ones
Posts: 216
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
The difference between you and me is I say they are all at fault. President, congress, manglement and the UAW. You obviously see no problem with 2500 per vehicle cost that has nothing to do with production of said vehicle.
Actually, you seem to lay more blame on the worker than anyone else. Where in my post did you see [U]anything[U] about what my thoughts were regarding the 2500 cost per vehicle?
BrownClown is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 02:57 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,696
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
The difference between you and me is I say they are all at fault. President, congress, manglement and the UAW. You obviously see no problem with 2500 per vehicle cost that has nothing to do with production of said vehicle.
So when you retire, you will have a problem with customers paying for your pension and health care costs, even though it has nothing to do with getting their package to them? As far as they would be concerned, why should they pay for that?
767pilot is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 07:00 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
So when you retire, you will have a problem with customers paying for your pension and health care costs, even though it has nothing to do with getting their package to them? As far as they would be concerned, why should they pay for that?
Let's not forget that the benefits the UAW workers, both the active workers as well as the retirees, receive are and were negotiated. As for the automotive customers paying the workers pension and health care costs, well frankly that shouldn't be an issue, because of course they are paying for them. Again, these are negotiated benefits. If the auto companies didn't plan for and fund their retirement and health care funds appropriately, and then manage and grow those funds, so that they will be viable in the future, why is that the fault of the workers?

There is certainly enough blame for this fiasco to go around, from the politicians (both state and federal), to the auto industry itself, including but not limited to their executives as well as their workers (and union), to the financial sector, and finally to the consumer himself. However, in my opinion, the government will have to again bail out an industry that dug its own grave, through years of mismanagement and missed opportunities, which now has one leg in that grave and the other on a banana peel, because to walk away from them is almost financially impossible, based on all the lives that are touched by the pay and benefits paid to automotive workers, their retirees, and all the industries and businesses that serve the auto industry. I believe it's something like 11 or 12 people who would be affected by each auto industry worker or retiree, losing their salary, health care benefits or pension. That's a lot of folks, folks.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 07:23 PM
  #37  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
The difference between you and me is I say they are all at fault. President, congress, manglement and the UAW. You obviously see no problem with 2500 per vehicle cost that has nothing to do with production of said vehicle.
I would agree. It is a quagmire of fault that can be passed around.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 07:37 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
767pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 767 captain
Posts: 2,696
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Let's not forget that the benefits the UAW workers, both the active workers as well as the retirees, receive are and were negotiated.

JJ
Nobody seemed to raise an issue about how much the workers made at Morgan Stanley or AIG and you can bet that they were paid more than the line guy at an auto plant. When it is a chance to take a shot at organized labor, whether it be the UAW or a group of airline pilots, people from all quarters tend to jump all over it. Go figure.
767pilot is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 08:19 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

I'm not taking a shot at organized labor, but a big part of the auto industry problem is that you can't have people on an assembly line earning substantially more money than the people who are purchasing the products made on that line, that plus the fact that either by design, or by manufacturing processes, those products are of less quality than the competition's, while at the same time, costing more, both initially as well as over the long term, and ending up with less residual value at the time the customer wants to replace said product.
Jetjok is offline  
Old 11-21-2008, 08:21 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot View Post
Nobody seemed to raise an issue about how much the workers made at Morgan Stanley or AIG and you can bet that they were paid more than the line guy at an auto plant. When it is a chance to take a shot at organized labor, whether it be the UAW or a group of airline pilots, people from all quarters tend to jump all over it. Go figure.

What I object to is a guy at the toyota plant in TX having his taxes raised to bail out GM because the democrats owe the UAW, go figure. The pensions were negotiated great, keep paying up till the tank runs dry. What you don't want to admit is until they dump the $2500 per vehicle in legacy cost they will never be competitive. Unless their other labor costs get in line they willl never compete. They will keep cutting factories and jobs until nothing is left. You feel for the employees, terrific; I am looking out for their best interest. Go figure.

Last edited by FDXLAG; 11-21-2008 at 08:32 PM.
FDXLAG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nightice
Regional
0
11-01-2008 01:34 PM
DYNASTY HVY
Foreign
0
09-28-2008 05:46 AM
rjjunkie
Regional
1
08-31-2008 06:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices