Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX--Please Explain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2009, 03:42 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 First Officer
Posts: 19
Default FDX--Please Explain

How we are grossly overmanned (at least in MD-11). I'm an 11 FO so I used the MEM Feb MD-11 bid pack to generate these numbers.

679 MD-11 FOs - 33 PO = 646

317 vacation weeks (estimated/some are more than a week) = 158 bodies essentially with a month off.

646 - 158 = 487 pilot bodies available

There are 469 MD-11 FO lines.

469 - 487 = 19 pilots remaining.

I understand the guys with vacation might not use all their days and/or may bid around it but still even if as many as 1/2 did we would still only have 98 extra pilots for all the reserve requirements generated by extra parings and sick and the VTO requirements for the trips knocked out by conflicts with vacation and training.

Pretty simple but does not look right--What big error did I make.
Eaglebeak is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 03:56 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 92
Default It's all about BLG

There's no error in your calculations but the issue is that the same number of pilots are flying fewer hours. If you take the number of hours available for MEM MD11 F/O's in Feb08, the numbers look like this:

469 lines x 65.25 CH avg F/O BLG = 30,602 CH

Now divide those CH by the average BLG for Aug 08:

30,602 CH / 85 CH (avg Aug 08 BLG) = 360 lines

That's a difference of 109 lines. The precipitous drop in BLGs means everyone is still flying but doing less of it and earning less. There's just fewer hours to go around.
XprsFr8r is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:19 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Now add the 12000 hours of C/O back in and what do you get?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:31 PM
  #4  
Thx Age 65
 
HoursHore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: MD11CAP
Posts: 1,041
Default

Off topic but if you bid a reserve line can you expand your vacation to 11 days vice 10 now?
HoursHore is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:33 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by XprsFr8r View Post
There's no error in your calculations but the issue is that the same number of pilots are flying fewer hours. If you take the number of hours available for MEM MD11 F/O's in Feb08, the numbers look like this:

469 lines x 65.25 CH avg F/O BLG = 30,602 CH

Now divide those CH by the average BLG for Aug 08:

30,602 CH / 85 CH (avg Aug 08 BLG) = 360 lines

That's a difference of 109 lines. The precipitous drop in BLGs means everyone is still flying but doing less of it and earning less. There's just fewer hours to go around.
85 hrs? For a 4 week bid month? You're talking apples and oranges there.

Try using Sept's BLG of 68hrs, for a similar 4-week month. Of course, it was bought up to that number. Don't know what the real hours were.

Last edited by Busboy; 01-14-2009 at 04:43 PM.
Busboy is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 04:36 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleTail's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 519
Default

Also...Don't forget to take into account the 100+ pilots bidding carryover and then NOT protecting Min Days the following months basically giving the company reason to furlough

Hopefully we will collectively suck it up for just a couple months and quit doing extra...

*** Use your vacation
*** Protect Min Days if you have carryover
*** No extra flying while the junior guys are on the chopping block

PurpleTail is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:21 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 92
Default Oh dopey me...

Originally Posted by Busboy View Post
85 hrs? For a 4 week bid month? You're talking apples and oranges there.

Try using Sept's BLG of 68hrs, for a similar 4-week month. Of course, it was bought up to that number. Don't know what the real hours were.
Yikes! You're right.

In the immortal words of Rosanne Rosanna Dana:

"Never mind!"
XprsFr8r is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:43 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 First Officer
Posts: 19
Default

There are 83 carryover trips in that bid pack that have over 1 day of CO. I didn't add it all up but very few exceeded a week and most were 2-4 days. So just as a wag of 83 x 36 = 2988 hours/65 = 45 extra lines and I think that is too much. C/O is not nearly the impact even if every hour was protected that everyone is making it out to be. They ain't going to furlough anybody.
Eaglebeak is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:50 PM
  #9  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: MD11 First Officer
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by XprsFr8r View Post
There's no error in your calculations but the issue is that the same number of pilots are flying fewer hours. If you take the number of hours available for MEM MD11 F/O's in Feb08, the numbers look like this:

469 lines x 65.25 CH avg F/O BLG = 30,602 CH

Now divide those CH by the average BLG for Aug 08:

30,602 CH / 85 CH (avg Aug 08 BLG) = 360 lines

That's a difference of 109 lines. The precipitous drop in BLGs means everyone is still flying but doing less of it and earning less. There's just fewer hours to go around.
Why don't we divide by 68 since that is the min they had to pay for a 4 week bid month.

30,602 CH/68 CH = 450 vs 469. Whoopee! A whole extra 19 lines!

Very little impact in MEM MD-11 as long as lines stay about where they are (which is what they have been mostly for months now anyway). Now it would be nice to know how others are affected.
Eaglebeak is offline  
Old 01-14-2009, 05:53 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheBaron's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: MD-11 FO
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Now add the 12000 hours of C/O back in and what do you get?
Let's see. 12000 C/O hours for 4600 pilots equals a whopping 2.6 hours per pilot. Not a real issue unless we actually put people on the street, regardless of the spin the MEC wants to put on it.
TheBaron is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boost
Cargo
20
06-07-2009 05:40 PM
1800 RVR
Cargo
13
11-07-2008 07:38 AM
captexpress
Cargo
7
11-04-2008 03:43 AM
Gunter
Cargo
12
11-03-2008 01:21 PM
grant123
Cargo
14
09-18-2008 09:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices