FedEx playing hardball with Congress
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
I must agree wholeheartedly!
Unions in general will greatly incresase the cost of doing business. The Teamsters is in reality organized crime! We don't need nor want this kind of disruptive corruption on the property. Can you imagine the disruption when the mob calls for sympathetic strikes as the Teamsters are known for doing? If ALPA endorses this kind of position through the crime ridden AFL-CIO, then I will dump my membership in ALPA. It's bad enough to see ALPA national giving money to the left-wing socialist DEMS, but it is beyond pale to watch them endorse organized crime!
I'm with Fred on this one!!!!!!
Unions in general will greatly incresase the cost of doing business. The Teamsters is in reality organized crime! We don't need nor want this kind of disruptive corruption on the property. Can you imagine the disruption when the mob calls for sympathetic strikes as the Teamsters are known for doing? If ALPA endorses this kind of position through the crime ridden AFL-CIO, then I will dump my membership in ALPA. It's bad enough to see ALPA national giving money to the left-wing socialist DEMS, but it is beyond pale to watch them endorse organized crime!
I'm with Fred on this one!!!!!!
This country needs sympathy strikes or more solidarity in organized labor and whether you think so or not, you would benefit.
As for FDX attempting to bully congress, I say they're bluffing. Even if they're not, it doesn't make a difference where they get their planes as Boeings and Airbus' are built around the globe anyway.
#33
Sure you would. You're the same guy who said ,"Socialism is required for a country to prosper". But what you really mean is, "a labor UNION friendly party", right? BTW, since you post on so many boards, on so many topics, with such a willingness to share your accumulated intellect, how did you ever find the time to become so dog gone brilliant?
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
So what's new besides the 'raison du jour'?
If ALPA endorses this kind of position through the crime ridden AFL-CIO, then I will dump my membership in ALPA.
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ca...new-union.html
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 983
Bottom line is Fred knows there's not too much demand for direct service between China and the mainland USA, hence there's no need for 45 777s. He's already deferred them once, so why not stir up a political fight rather than cancel the remaining airframes outright? Why is it that UPS can maintain steady profitability with a unionized workforce of 240,000 out of 450,000 but Fred is scared of unions?
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 221
Are you saying that because FedEx was formed as an airline (under the RLA) that no matter what the corporation morphs into it should ALWAYS remain under its origin RLA?
I've always envied the way one guy delivered all the stuff at UPS and wondered why we didn't follow suit. Now I am starting to understand. Method to the madness.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 983
Just in case you don't understand our structure. The Express unit is completely separate from Ground, LTL, Freight etc.. We don't carry their stuff on planes and they don't deliver our stuff on their trucks. The purple and orange trucks are the ones he is trying to keep the Teamsters from because they are part of the airline and mutually exclusive from the other units. We have different sort facilities and entirely different hubs. I think he is justified trying to keep them away from the airline. However, probably can't make that arguement with Ground, Freight etc..
I've always envied the way one guy delivered all the stuff at UPS and wondered why we didn't follow suit. Now I am starting to understand. Method to the madness.
I've always envied the way one guy delivered all the stuff at UPS and wondered why we didn't follow suit. Now I am starting to understand. Method to the madness.
#39
Right, and the RLA doesn't prevent unions. And if the employees, in the same class and craft, throughout the US want to be in a union, they can. I've got no problem with FedEx employees unionizing if that is what the majority want to do. I just don't want to see something on the order of Air France where 3 different unions represent the pilots. We really don't need Teamsters in EWR, I.A.M. in DTW, an in-house union in IND, none in PHX.....you get the picture.
#40
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post