Trivial UPS
06-10-2009 | 04:29 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Trivial UPS
First, good news at UPS!
Second, I haven't seen anything on this before and was wondering if the current state of things has changed the plans/progress of the Worldport expansion??
Third, any talk of the 744 being brought to SDF??
Second, I haven't seen anything on this before and was wondering if the current state of things has changed the plans/progress of the Worldport expansion??
Third, any talk of the 744 being brought to SDF??
06-10-2009 | 05:09 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
2. NO
3. NO
06-10-2009 | 10:13 AM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Serving the chicken and taking the first break.
Explain how it could possibly make sense for a/fleet of 747-400's to be based in SDF?
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
06-10-2009 | 10:18 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Explain how it could possibly make sense for a/fleet of 747-400's to be based in SDF?
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
SDF over the top bypass ANC to the the destinations , they are working on the program.
06-10-2009 | 11:15 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: 1 ft out the door
Explain how it could possibly make sense for a/fleet of 747-400's to be based in SDF?
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
It would work out great for the crewmembers, but how does it work for management? The numbers gave a 10% increase in crewmember utilization by using the ANC base. They don't deadhead up to ANC and lose 4 days a bid period. Not to mention they don't use hotels and incur other expenses while up there.
Its the top 500 guys dream to base the 400 in SDF, but financially doesn't make sense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B727DRVR
Cargo
14
08-22-2008 02:23 PM
