Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FCIF DRUG and ALCOHOL TESTING @ RAMPS >

FCIF DRUG and ALCOHOL TESTING @ RAMPS


Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FCIF DRUG and ALCOHOL TESTING @ RAMPS

Old 11-25-2009 | 04:21 AM
  #1  
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default FCIF DRUG and ALCOHOL TESTING @ RAMPS

This is absurd ...................... you are given ONE HOUR for Show at the ramp and then might have to submit to this testing at the ramp BEFORE you can perform any required crew duties ................. What are the ramifications of not getting this done in a "timely manner" ? Removed from Trip ? Delay the Trip ? What is the follow up to something like this if the trip is delayed and are we going to get further interrogations ? What say YOU !!!
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 04:30 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Default

I think this is no big deal at all. You report on-time, get tagged for testing, trip suffers a slight delay attributed to something other than crew, ramp, or maintenance and you go anyway. It's beyond your control so not your fault, no big deal.
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 05:31 AM
  #3  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by FDXFLYR
I think this is no big deal at all. You report on-time, get tagged for testing, trip suffers a slight delay attributed to something other than crew, ramp, or maintenance and you go anyway. It's beyond your control so not your fault, no big deal.

I agree ... this one is easy to explain should anyone in management question the delay
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 05:35 AM
  #4  
jagplt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: 777 Multi-tasker
Default

Originally Posted by FDXFLYR
I think this is no big deal at all. You report on-time, get tagged for testing, trip suffers a slight delay attributed to something other than crew, ramp, or maintenance and you go anyway. It's beyond your control so not your fault, no big deal.
Can't wait for the fallout when a guy can't "donate" for an hour and a half or so.. Say, he just went before he left the hotel, drinks water like a mad man, but just can't go... miss the sort with a wide body jet worth of revenue..

stand back and watch the wind machine get hit! bet the next test before a flight won't be so random. An amazing shift from pre-test to post-test.. after the flight, can't go for 2 hours... our problem not theirs.

whadda ya gonna do?
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 05:51 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: 777 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by jagplt
Can't wait for the fallout when a guy can't "donate" for an hour and a half or so.. Say, he just went before he left the hotel, drinks water like a mad man, but just can't go... miss the sort with a wide body jet worth of revenue..

stand back and watch the wind machine get hit! bet the next test before a flight won't be so random. An amazing shift from pre-test to post-test.. after the flight, can't go for 2 hours... our problem not theirs.

whadda ya gonna do?
Actually this is not the Company sticking it to you. It is the Company complying with Federal Regulations.

Wouldn't if be nice if our elected representatives had to take the same tests?
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 06:53 AM
  #6  
jagplt's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: 777 Multi-tasker
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Turpen
Actually this is not the Company sticking it to you. It is the Company complying with Federal Regulations.

Aware it's not the company, but my point remains... I'll bet there are more post tests than pretests after one major late event. Compliance in a more convenient manner.

Wouldn't if be nice if our elected representatives had to take the same tests?
are you talking about the elected representatives that are the subject of the long list of tax violators, bad check passers, domestic violators and the continuation of the long list that makes up the criminal record of our congress?

good luck getting that passed.... nice thought though Chuck!
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
frozenboxhauler's Avatar
Nice lookin' tree, there!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 14
From: Tool-Box, old man
Default

Originally Posted by jagplt
Can't wait for the fallout when a guy can't "donate" for an hour and a half or so.. Say, he just went before he left the hotel, drinks water like a mad man, but just can't go... miss the sort with a wide body jet worth of revenue..

stand back and watch the wind machine get hit! bet the next test before a flight won't be so random. An amazing shift from pre-test to post-test.. after the flight, can't go for 2 hours... our problem not theirs.

whadda ya gonna do?
I'm looking forward to the notification. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
fbh
Reply
Old 11-25-2009 | 11:16 PM
  #8  
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: MD-11, F/O
Default

What I find really amazing is suddenly all of the "chain of custody" problems that heretofore prevented any D&A testing outside of major hubs is now trustworthy. I'm wondering if ALA, CDG, PEN, PUD, SZX........not to mention Flint, ELP, TUS, MIA etc protocols are........."monitored"?
Reply
Old 11-26-2009 | 06:59 AM
  #9  
FXDX's Avatar
Proponent of Hysteria
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
From: 3B
Default

Although I am just as p-o'd at the company right now with the implementation of 4A2B as the next guy, I think in this case the company is actually going out on a limb to protect the crews and the movement of the freight.

Go back and read the last paragraph of the FCIF very slowly. Read between the lines and you may discern a very subtle but important potential difference in the testing protocol.

I won't spell it out, but take a close look at it and see what you think. I think the company is trying to look out for all our interests in this case.

Happy Thanksgiving.
Reply
Old 11-26-2009 | 06:24 PM
  #10  
tennesseeflyboy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Default

JAGPLT, you are apparently on the same page with me about this.
I am so glad to know that our other brethren here are able to "****" on command. Clearly this is requirement from DOT as the FCIF points out.
I am not a truck driver ...........................
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LivingAloft07
Aviation Law
62
04-14-2009 07:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices