Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

777 payrates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 05:09 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default 777 payrates

Just a point for your negotiaing committee : The " D " 777 payrates for contract C2K (2000) were 319.61/12-yr Cap, and 218.29/ 12-yr fo.

We all know that these payrates did NOT cause the slide into BK, but they were in place apprx 10 years ago.

4a2b might not suck quite as badly with a proper payrate. Good luck on your next contract.

Regards,
BG
FedElta is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 05:12 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

FedElta,

Those going to the 777 this year won't even feel 4a2b. I'm sure some don't even know what it is.

Our 757 crewmembers, no 4a2b there, get paid more than a lower half of the list widebody crewmember.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 05:28 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default Gunter

Hey Gunter,
I'm only an outsider , looking in. My hope is that your union will close the contractual loopholes that have allowed the uneven application of 4a2b....new contract coming, right?

My personal experience in this industry is that We are never as clever as They. The payrate is the only thing that They can't outsmart us on.

If you are able to negotiate the proper payrate on the 777, it should drag the other equipment payrates upward as well. B757 paid at narrow body rates?.....not so good. +1 for PC and the boys.

Best of luck,
BG
FedElta is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 05:53 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

I appreciate the good natured discussion and honest point of view.

The fact is there is no "sting" to be taken out of 4a2b for those on or going to the 777 or 757. That's what I was addressing. Higher pay rates for them may be "industry standard" bargaining technique but it is seldom executed in such junior pilot unfriendly way. Thank you management and DW.

Many have tried to sell me on the trickle down theory over the years. Kinda funny how that is both a Republican and an ALPA slogan. Guess that's why senior ALPA members have trouble giving support to the Democratic party. Union member but conservative. I've got mine but don't want to share. But that is a different, non-APC, discussion.

Somehow Bernie Madoff's picture pops into view and the small hairs stand up on my neck when I hear, "all boats will rise with the tide."

Last edited by Gunter; 01-28-2010 at 06:07 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 05:53 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
parks31's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
FedElta,

Those going to the 777 this year won't even feel 4a2b. I'm sure some don't even know what it is.

Our 757 crewmembers, no 4a2b there, get paid more than a lower half of the list widebody crewmember.
Not all people going to the 777 are going by choice. I have been at 55ch or so since 4a2b and now am going backwards in seat and payrate...
parks31 is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 05:57 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta View Post
Hey Gunter,
I'm only an outsider , looking in. My hope is that your union will close the contractual loopholes that have allowed the uneven application of 4a2b....new contract coming, right?

My personal experience in this industry is that We are never as clever as They. The payrate is the only thing that They can't outsmart us on.

If you are able to negotiate the proper payrate on the 777, it should drag the other equipment payrates upward as well. B757 paid at narrow body rates?.....not so good. +1 for PC and the boys.

Best of luck,
BG
Not to be hyper critical but I don't think so. If we pay our CEOs more that will just drag everyone else pay up higher right? We already traded enough to get A 380 rates I aint willing to trade anything to get 777 rates.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 06:10 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default

Hey Lag,

I take your point. Regardless of the outcome of current payrate arbitration, wouldn't contract time be the correct time to fix payrate disparities ?

I only posted the D 777 rates as a bar......if it is of any interest/ value I can post rates for other similar equipment......or you can peruse it over on the Major forum, under "latest & greatest ."

Regards,
BG
FedElta is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 06:12 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by parks31 View Post
Not all people going to the 777 are going by choice. I have been at 55ch or so since 4a2b and now am going backwards in seat and payrate...
Not trying to minimize your loss. It is significant and an important consideration. As is all pay loss during this fiasco that was caused by retro and improper 4a2b implementation. Your 55 CH has been partly caused by 75+ CH lines on the 757 and 777 due to too much flying being shifted to soon.

I'm assuming you chose 777 instead of MD11 or A300 and the 777 was the least disruptive for pay purposes.

Importantly, if we didn't have 4a2b you would have been excessed a long time ago.

Last edited by Gunter; 01-28-2010 at 06:34 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 06:38 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta View Post
Hey Lag,

I take your point. Regardless of the outcome of current payrate arbitration, wouldn't contract time be the correct time to fix payrate disparities ?

I only posted the D 777 rates as a bar......if it is of any interest/ value I can post rates for other similar equipment......or you can peruse it over on the Major forum, under "latest & greatest ."

Regards,
BG
Nope I understand. I think we ought to have 8 payrates or 1 payrate. I wouldn't mind hearing the NC thoughts on the subject or a MEC members. Seems like something we should have a majority opinion on before they hit the table. Especially since a lot of Wide Body Airbi pilots may be looking at Narrow body rates in the not to distant future.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 01-28-2010, 07:55 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Chilitime's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Especially since a lot of Wide Body Airbi pilots may be looking at Narrow body rates in the not to distant future.

What do you mean by that one? Just guys getting bumped, or is the new plan to get rid of the bus?
Chilitime is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HankHill
Cargo
58
04-24-2010 08:13 AM
AirbusA320
Cargo
3
08-30-2009 06:10 AM
Sniper
Military
27
06-22-2009 05:58 PM
vagabond
Foreign
1
04-12-2009 05:29 PM
vagabond
Technical
4
12-31-2008 04:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices