No F/O Landings Until T/A?
08-22-2006, 07:11 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
I have to say that while it might be a good way to cause issues within the scheduling and currency departments, it also has the very negative impact of splitting a deep wedge between the pilot group. If an FO is willing to participate so be it. But I can tell you that any captain that imposes "self-rule" and forbids an FO (involuntairly) from flying is doing nothing to help the overall situation.
I certainly hope that this post is in jest.
I certainly hope that this post is in jest.
With the rash of landing gear falling off airplanes around here, who could blame them.
The bulk of the Pilots on this property are on board with the program. in other words there won't be any wedge...............especially when the Comapny begins to negotiate in good faith.
08-22-2006, 07:13 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by navyman_tx
If so than I will have to see what you are talking about when I get there. But I do not think that what I read was confusing. Don't let the FO's land. To me that means don't let them land, which in turn means that they will not remain current, which then means that they will have to go to the sim to keep current, which means that I am not that confused!!!!!!
Just maybe we will get a contract worth having.......still confused??
08-22-2006, 07:15 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Originally Posted by navyman_tx
My mistake then. If anybody's feelings got hurt tonight; well, I don't know what to tell you! I don't have much of a shoulder left to cry on. I just want to get my job and have fun with it. That's all, i don't want anymore trouble in the end when there is plenty to be had already.
You mean you don't work here??........................
08-22-2006, 07:23 PM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Originally Posted by FoxHunter
The best way to support the union is for Captains not to let the F/O fly. The company will have to use the very scarce SIM time to keep the airplanes flying. The other advantage to this tact is that we have numerous F/Os that will make public the names of any Captains that have given them landings.
08-22-2006, 07:28 PM
#25
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Pilot, duhrr...
Posts: 89
i mean that right now at this minute i am at the bottom of the food chain. Flying at mach .15, hoping to make it home to see my wife evryday. I will be working in a form of the major arena soon(hopefully),this being the regionals, charter, cargo, corporate. So far, I have seen alot of backstabbing and double crossing. That's all.
08-22-2006, 07:38 PM
#26
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Oh, brother.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
08-22-2006, 08:03 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 675
Originally Posted by TonyC
Oh, brother.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
08-22-2006, 09:06 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Originally Posted by TonyC
Oh, brother.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
I'm sure that FoxHUnter is having the best laugh he's had all year.
Don't y'all realize yet that he just DELIGHTS in stirring the pot? He would no more deny an FO a landing to "support his union" than I would disrespect my mother. He doesn't mean what he said, he just tossed a big ole hook with smelly bait in a pool of hungry piranha and look at all the bites he got.
Very funny, FoxHunter. Now you've had your laugh.
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, ...
... you know the rest.
Besides, the FOM contains guidance about FO legs. In light of that guidance, and our normal practice, it would be impossible to defend his strategy in court.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
