Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

What is up UPS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2010 | 01:13 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
Like I said in my initial post, whatever happened to "he's innocent until proven guilty?"
Just one point - It's not "innocent until proven guilty". It is "Presumed innocent until proven guilty", and this applies only to legal proceedings. This is only a reinforcement that it is the prosecution's burden to prove guilt. Criminals who actually commit a crime are not innocent of the crime until proven guilty. They were guilty of committing a crime all along.

That being said, I don't know whether he is guilty or not. I'm just saying that it's perfectly acceptable to discuss the information that has been released without having to tip-toe around the "innocent until proven guilty" comments.
Reply
Old 11-19-2010 | 03:14 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Presumption of innocence is a legal right that we all are granted. It states that no person shall be considered guilty until finally convicted by a court. Unfortunately we have guys here who are ready to string him up by his short hairs, without really knowing the facts. That, in and of itself is sort of scary, don't you think. I for one would not want any of those guys sitting on a jury, judging me for some act that I might or might not have committed.

JJ
Reply
Old 11-19-2010 | 03:56 PM
  #33  
3XLoser's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: awkward
Default

Convicted of illegal computer use by a jury of his peers on airlinepilotcentral.com.

OK, what's next on the docket?
Reply
Old 11-19-2010 | 04:23 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
Presumption of innocence is a legal right that we all are granted. It states that no person shall be considered guilty until finally convicted by a court. Unfortunately we have guys here who are ready to string him up by his short hairs, without really knowing the facts. That, in and of itself is sort of scary, don't you think. I for one would not want any of those guys sitting on a jury, judging me for some act that I might or might not have committed.

JJ
You are free to presume him innocent. I am free to presume him whatever I want to. I know I would not trust him to drive the babysitter home. How about you?

The government is required to presume him innocent. Even that has loopholes, otherwise how could you lock someone up prior to trial.

INNOCENCE, PRESUMPTION OF

The indictment or formal charge against any person is not evidence of guilt. Indeed, the person is presumed by the law to be innocent. The law does not require a person to prove his innocence or produce any evidence at all. The Government has the burden of proving a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and if it fails to do so the person is (so far as the law is concerned) not guilty.

Legal Definition of 'Innocence, Presumption Of'
Reply
Old 11-19-2010 | 04:25 PM
  #35  
The Walrus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Socket Drawer
Default

The government is also required to presume a radical islamic terrorist to be innocent until they try to light their shoe or underware on fire.
Reply
Old 11-19-2010 | 04:36 PM
  #36  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Back to the Future Jets
Default Probable cause

I imagine that law enforcement now has probable cause to search his computer, unlike the 19th highjacker (pre-9/11). If he is as clean as the wind driven snow, he can sleep well knowing that forensic analysis of his hard drive is doing the tedious work of testifying for him right now. He’s probably sleeping so well, in fact, that he is glad for the time off from work. What a diabolical way to get the holidays at home! The company will probably see through the rouse and consider it an illegal job action. I don’t recommend this method of bidding the holidays off. Good luck to his legal defense fund!
Reply
Old 11-20-2010 | 07:26 AM
  #37  
Freightpuppy's Avatar
Freightmama!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
But there is the possibility that he is a caring and concerned father and family man who thinks he's been corresponding with a youth who has been turning tricks on the street to escape a broken or abusive home life. And unless there was some specific language in their chats regarding specific acts and/or payment for same, that may well be what was intended.
You should be a defense attorney if the pilot gig doesn't work out for you.
Reply
Old 11-20-2010 | 07:43 AM
  #38  
navigatro's Avatar
Permanent Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Whistlin' Dan
It's interesting to me that the only charge brought so far is "unlawful use of a computer." Kentucky, like most states, has pretty specific language dealing with attempts to entice children into sex acts using the computer or otherwise. That the state hasn't brought the charge tells me that something may be amiss in their allegations against this man.

Unlike many of you, I don't personally know the individual charged in this. He may well be a perv. But there is the possibility that he is a caring and concerned father and family man who thinks he's been corresponding with a youth who has been turning tricks on the street to escape a broken or abusive home life. And unless there was some specific language in their chats regarding specific acts and/or payment for same, that may well be what was intended.
Unlawful Use of a Computer (KRS 510.155) is where you solicit a minor (or Law Enforcement officer posing as a minor) to meet for sex. It is a Class D felony (1 to 5 years in prison)
Reply
Old 11-20-2010 | 09:32 AM
  #39  
Green Giant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

I have kids so I really hate these people that prey on kids.

With that said, I have known this individual for years and have always known him to be a great guy. Not just a good guy but a great guy. With that said, I hope that it turns out that this is some misunderstanding and that the police are just trying to "bag" a pilot that they lured in without actually getting him to agree to any acts. If that is the case, he could have been trying to help this individual out of a "bad situation" in life.

I for one would hate to be in this situation when in fact am actually not guilty of anything. Just wrong place at wrong time with a police force trying to arrest at all cost.

On the other hand, I have kids and if guilty he should get the max.
Reply
Old 11-20-2010 | 09:48 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro
Unlawful Use of a Computer (KRS 510.155) is where you solicit a minor (or Law Enforcement officer posing as a minor) to meet for sex. It is a Class D felony (1 to 5 years in prison)
Thanks for the info. I see that the statute applies to "commercial sexual activity" so there may have been some discussion of specific acts and payment for same. IF so.....
Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
You should be a defense attorney if the pilot gig doesn't work out for you.
What? You don't think spending most of my career years flying clapped-out freighters for third-rate "airlines" is sleezy enough?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
16
02-18-2009 03:34 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
3
10-20-2006 09:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices