Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
ups/ ipa....oops, nevermind >

ups/ ipa....oops, nevermind


Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

ups/ ipa....oops, nevermind

Old 03-18-2011 | 02:04 PM
  #11  
Waborita's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: 109% IPA
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by 320Driver
I hope his next letter is his resignation. This is WAY too sloppy for an IPA Prez. Many were concerned with BT and his impulsiveness when he was elected. Those fears are glaringly obvious now. Do the right thing, Bob, step aside-- you're hurting our cause...

Considering only 30% voted for him I think the other 70% new it would back fire at some point just not this big!

Fire! Ready! Aim!

Last edited by Waborita; 03-18-2011 at 02:07 PM. Reason: To add another embarrassment face
Reply
Old 03-18-2011 | 02:07 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: looking for a bridge to sleep under in ANC
Default

Originally Posted by Waborita
Considering only 30% voted for him I think the other 70% new it would back fire at some point just not this big!

Fire! Ready! Aim!
Amen and Amen. The majority has spoken.........oh wait, never mind. Thankfully that little hole in the system has been plugged.
Reply
Old 03-20-2011 | 04:50 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 2
From: Short the Market
Default

Originally Posted by Waborita
Considering only 30% voted for him I think the other 70% new it would back fire at some point just not this big!

Fire! Ready! Aim!
Considering less than 35% of us voted for him (actually I think it was closer to 25%), I don't know what makes anyone think 35% of the fqs (much less 50%+1) would feel confident in his leadership.

The best thing BT (prez) can do for his campaign promise to deliver the managers would be to resign and let Lonestar BT (VP) provide leadership we can all believe in.
Reply
Old 03-20-2011 | 05:01 PM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Default

Bob and Tom are doing a great job, just ask them and they will tell while they pat themselves on the back. If you dare question them you will get a tounge lashing about minding your own business and to stay out of the EB's! The IPA is for all of us as long as you agree with the big boys.
Reply
Old 03-20-2011 | 05:10 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 2
From: Short the Market
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
Bob and Tom are doing a great job, just ask them and they will tell while they pat themselves on the back. If you dare question them you will get a tounge lashing about minding your own business and to stay out of the EB's! The IPA is for all of us as long as you agree with the big boys.
Your statement describes bullies, not "big boys". Sadly, I can not dispute the rest of what you say.
Reply
Old 03-20-2011 | 05:50 PM
  #16  
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
Bob and Tom are doing a great job, just ask them and they will tell while they pat themselves on the back. If you dare question them you will get a tounge lashing about minding your own business and to stay out of the EB's! The IPA is for all of us as long as you agree with the big boys.
In many ways, this mirrors national politics, not in the least what kind of an organization this is. Like this country, the IPA is in effect a representative republic infused with elements of mostly benevolent dictatorship and monarchy.

In the salad days it was much of the time a not-so-benevolent dictatorship and ubur-monarchy with almost complete and absolute control at the top with the remaining members of the EB entrusted with strategic information and power, but largely at the beck and call/control of Miller. In the day it largely worked pretty well with a few glaring exceptions (like the FQS issue at its beginning-some suggest Miller's actions have already doomed the effort, thank you very much), the numerous side letters and gave aways the building scam which cost him re-election against Nicholson. The Nicholson administration could be likened to the invasion of Iraq, where Fallujan loyalists loyal to Miller started placing IED's all over the place before Nicholson ever set foot in the Mahal...and it cost us big time. Now, we have Thrush, who I'll admit has some rough edges, but for my money is the most stalwart defender of the CBA and our position by far and away. Flanked with Tom and Lonestar despite this blunder I remain confident that we're better off than any other scenario.

So...you genius' want a coup? Until what...one of you can strut in and tell us how it really is? Realllllly?

Outstanding.

Go on and have a protest at the Mahal. Camp out in the lobby flexed cuffed to each other chanting slogans and showering/washing your hair in the landscaping sprinklers with hotel soap and shampoo like you're in Wisconsin...maybe you'll get on the SDF local news or Rachel Maddow.

Last edited by Sideshow Bob; 03-21-2011 at 08:11 AM.
Reply
Old 03-20-2011 | 06:05 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FR8TFLYER
Bob and Tom are doing a great job, just ask them and they will tell while they pat themselves on the back. If you dare question them you will get a tounge lashing about minding your own business and to stay out of the EB's! The IPA is for all of us as long as you agree with the big boys.
This is disgustingly accurate.!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old 03-21-2011 | 02:37 PM
  #18  
nightrider's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Bus driver
Default

BT is the best, the only real leader we have had. In my 11 yrs here. The fqm situation will still be dealt with.
Reply
Old 03-21-2011 | 05:55 PM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 140
Likes: 2
From: Short the Market
Default

Originally Posted by nightrider
BT is the best, the only real leader we have had. In my 11 yrs here. The fqm situation will still be dealt with.
If your measure of "best" is ineffective tough talk as opposed to results, then I agree with you. As to the fqs situation, I hope you are right, but I doubt it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
1
06-06-2008 07:03 PM
Priority 3
Cargo
11
06-01-2007 08:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices