Same place that you can for a PC - have you tried p.f.c or fdx.alpa.org?:rolleyes:

I had one on my old PC that was formatted as an "HTML help file", and was much better than the regular PDF or HTML files. Sadly, my Mac won't seem to open it.

No excuses for the DP flyers in question, but maybe the DP process should have been/should be reworked. As I understand it, a DP has to not be flown for 3 months before action can be taken to have it removed. What happens one or two legs of that 9+ day DP change next month? And what do we gain by not flying it this month? Is there a better way to do this?

Disregard, operator error.

The point isn't what is to be gained by not flying the DP...it's what is lost by flying it. We lose a little more unity each time someone flies a DP and we weaken the integrity of the whole SIG/PSIT/dispute process.

You misunderstand the process. Not a very good process but it's all we have right now.

Don't let scumbags make you rationalize doing something you know is not right.

If someone wants to dine alone on trips, go right ahead and pick them up. It's your life.

Most of the repeat offenders are usually all about me anyway. Denying training swaps and the like. This just solidifies their standing and lets everyone know who they are.

Just trying to figure out how to find the DP's.

If I remember correctly, I read the SIG notes in the ALPA emails, and I don't recall any DP's for the 727, is that correct?

I just tried a search in Air Line Pilots Association, International and couldn't find a reference to dates and pairing numbers...

Thanks.

I keep the SIG email in my inbox until the month is over..... then delete

Disputed Pairings

MEM 777 - #60 on 28June11
MEM MD11 - #458 on 08June11
ANC MD11 - #96 on 24June11

Does anyone else wonder why we have less disputed pairings than in the past? Our trips certainly aren't any better. In fact, I would say the trips today as a whole, are much worse than they were 2 years ago.

Thanks, appreciate it.