Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS Worldport expansion costs planes/jobs >

UPS Worldport expansion costs planes/jobs

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Worldport expansion costs planes/jobs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-27-2011, 04:11 PM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

We all know that the % of screw ups is about the same for line or Mgt at UPS is very similar. Most pilots (line or Mgt) take their flying very seriously.
aflouisville is offline  
Old 09-27-2011, 04:35 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

We all know EH is the anomaly. And I am told there is a reason why.
aflouisville is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 01:02 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilot7576's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 679
Default eh anomaly

well...tell us what his problem is?

Pilot7576
Pilot7576 is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 01:37 AM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

No clue on that omen
aflouisville is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 12:50 PM
  #55  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

EH is a loser. He should have been terminated a long time ago
aflouisville is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 04:02 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 129
Default

That's not at all what I meant with his reference. He is a good guy personally, and a good guy to fly with, actually. I believe he was put in a spot he was not "qualified" for, as were serveral other FQM's. No other airline I know of has 500 hour wonders giving check rides to guys who have five times the experience flying aircraft around the world. Experience in type and and ability should be the primary qualification. That was my point with the EH example. I could have used others, and I regret singling him out...
320Driver is offline  
Old 09-28-2011, 04:18 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
highsky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: missionary
Posts: 320
Default

Originally Posted by aflouisville View Post
EH is a loser. He should have been terminated a long time ago
For him, it will take an especially long list of problems to can him, if you know what I mean.
highsky is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 07:10 AM
  #58  
Gets all holidays off
 
fr8rcaptain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: Retired UPS 767 Captain, SDF Z
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by CzechAirman View Post
At the UPS investor's conference yesterday, UPS Airlines president Mitch Nichols said that had UPS not expanded Worldport in SDF, and instead, expanded the regional sorts that the airline would have required 40% more aircraft to handle the current volume of packages. How many more crewmembers would 40%, mostly domestic, aircraft require?
UPS has chosen a different business model from FedEx. UPS has consolidated most of the sort to Worldport (KSDF) using widebody aircraft, while FedEx is emphasizing decentralized multiple domestic sorts supported by both widebodies and a larger narrow-body fleet. Mr. Nichols was contrasting these two business models, trying to show the UPS model as the more efficient (read: lower cost) model (and it probably is, but I'm personally not enamored with so many eggs in one basket).

The bean counters at UPS really count the beans well. This company tracks and quantifies EVERYTHING, and tries to find a more efficient (cheaper) way to conduct business. All of this increases the bottom line.

One of the largest impacts on our pilot staffing and block hours actually occurred in 1998, when the Teamsters agreed to team drivers for the feeder trucks (those big semis and doubles you see on the interstates). In short order our daytime domestic block hours were cut by around 30% and most of the regional sorts were closed, along with the Saturday sort in Louisville. The UPS domestic trucking/rail system was now so efficient, they could truck most of the deferred (NOT NDA) volume to Worldport, or a regional gateway, saving $$$$ over actually flying the volume.
fr8rcaptain is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 01:23 PM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Default

You are right. An airplane is just a truck
aflouisville is offline  
Old 09-29-2011, 06:33 PM
  #60  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by aflouisville View Post
Really.....do you believe the FAA would tolerate these kind of screw ups. Believe me.....they would not
UPS has bought the FAA so yes, I do believe they would tolerate it esp. by management. I thought for sure by now they would have sided with us on the P3 issue and we are still waiting. I was naive to think the FAA would actually do the right thing but once again, money talks.
Freightpuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
767pilot
Cargo
113
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
02-19-2006 10:02 PM
ShamH85
Cargo
3
09-22-2005 07:58 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices