Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Cargo Slump And The 747-8 >

Cargo Slump And The 747-8

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Cargo Slump And The 747-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2011 | 01:59 PM
  #1  
vagabond's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,025
Likes: 0
From: C-172
Default Cargo Slump And The 747-8

There is a cargo slump?? Certainly not evident at NRT yesterday where there seemed to be more FedEx planes than passenger ones!

Cargo slump threatens more pain for Boeing 747-8 | Reuters
Reply
Old 10-28-2011 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,611
Likes: 15
Default

Maybe if FedEx was buying 747-8s that would be good for the 747-8.
Reply
Old 10-28-2011 | 11:00 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

Sierra ramp in Amsterdam was nearly full of cargo planes yesterday.....
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 12:15 AM
  #4  
The Dominican's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
From: 747 captain
Default

ANA's cargo numbers are way high, up to the point that they have been using passenger 777's on freighter flights (just using the lower deck) because they don't have enough freighters to cover the demand, I don't know what these people are talking about
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
New Hire
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Dominican, I assume you fly for AIr JApan, do you like the job? and which contract company do you use, I was thinking of Applying?
Thanks
Reply
Old 10-29-2011 | 07:16 PM
  #6  
SVTCobra's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
From: B747-400 CA
Default

I think the operators that ordered the -800 are getting cold feet given the cost and the extremely small difference in payload (4-6 more pallets) vs the -400. The -800 is suppose to burn 16% less fuel. I don't see an advantage for the -800 unless you pay cash for it.

Last edited by SVTCobra; 10-29-2011 at 07:32 PM.
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 08:24 AM
  #7  
Green Giant's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Airbus
Default

Boeing dropped the last two digits. So it is now only the B747-8. The -8 does have a greater range with a full load verses the -400.

With the -400's being harder to find, the -8 might be attractive considering that they have a common type with the -400.
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,527
Likes: 126
Default

There's a great article in the 10/31 issue of Time about the China bubble economy.... Very relevant to this discussion.
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble
There's a great article in the 10/31 issue of Time about the China bubble economy.... Very relevant to this discussion.
Here's a piece done on 10/17.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2096345-1,00.html


Ally
Reply
Old 10-30-2011 | 09:46 PM
  #10  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Hawker 800
Default

This isn't as recent, but its a great video showing China's housing boom.
China's Hypergrowth Fueled By Building Giant Cities No One Lives In - The Consumerist
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices