Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Colgan and Part 117

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2011 | 03:50 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default Colgan and Part 117

I may have missed it, but where in Part 117 does it prevent another Colgan-like fatigued crew?
Reply
Old 12-22-2011 | 04:01 AM
  #2  
UPTme's Avatar
Hire me
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Default

I may have missed it, but when did Colgan become a cargo airline?
Reply
Old 12-22-2011 | 05:34 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by UPTme
I may have missed it, but when did Colgan become a cargo airline?
Cargo airlines are not exempt from Colgan-like fatigue...

But to partially answer my question, isn't there something in Part 117 requiring one to certify before flight ones fitness? If so, seems that the FAA (and maybe even the company) could take action if that certification was suspect.
Reply
Old 12-25-2011 | 06:34 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UPTme
I may have missed it, but when did Colgan become a cargo airline?
This is the dirty little secret that no one wants to talk about. If pilots are truly interested in safety, they would not be exceeding duty limits (if you consider their commute).
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 06:30 AM
  #5  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RealityCheck
isn't there something in Part 117 requiring one to certify before flight ones fitness? If so, seems that the FAA (and maybe even the company) could take action if that certification was suspect.
It's too expensive for us to be properly rested, per the FAA and DOT.

The FAA is playing roulette. Passengers face the biggest threat from tired Pax pilots. Lower odds of failure, they suppose, from cargo pilots.

Last edited by Gunter; 12-26-2011 at 07:27 AM.
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 06:51 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by UPSierra
This is the dirty little secret that no one wants to talk about. If pilots are truly interested in safety, they would not be exceeding duty limits (if you consider their commute).
No. The dirty little secret is the FAA is too corrupt to actually make shoddy regionals like Colgan and Gulfstream fire a pilot who failed 7 checkrides throughout his history. They refuse to enforce respectable training just because better qualified pilots don't want to work under the crappy pay and conditions provided by regionals. When a regional flying 70 seat turboprops in the Northeast requires nothing more then a paper commercial certificate with ink that hasn't even dried yet, something is wrong.
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 06:58 AM
  #7  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UPSierra
They (pilots) would not be exceeding duty limits (if you consider their commute).
strong words. Think that assertion will hold up in court?

Last edited by Gunter; 12-26-2011 at 07:17 AM.
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 08:34 AM
  #8  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
No. The dirty little secret is the FAA is too corrupt to actually make shoddy regionals like Colgan and Gulfstream fire a pilot who failed 7 checkrides throughout his history. They refuse to enforce respectable training just because better qualified pilots don't want to work under the crappy pay and conditions provided by regionals. When a regional flying 70 seat turboprops in the Northeast requires nothing more then a paper commercial certificate with ink that hasn't even dried yet, something is wrong.
It isn't the FAA's job to fire the pilots - it is the company's responsibility.
If you meant that the standards might ought to be raised then you might be right.

USMCFLYR
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
It isn't the FAA's job to fire the pilots - it is the company's responsibility.
If you meant that the standards might ought to be raised then you might be right.

USMCFLYR
No. It's not the FAA's job to fire pilots. But it is the FAA's job to monitor training programs and standards. So yes, I was speaking of standards.
Reply
Old 12-26-2011 | 08:47 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

The media made a big deal about the Colgan families being behind the rest rules. Are the media and those families aware that the new rules have done nothing that require pilots to be properly rested after their commute? Just sayin'...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mjarosz
Regional
128
08-26-2010 04:42 AM
vtx531
Regional
78
07-01-2010 05:36 PM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
5
10-21-2008 05:17 AM
Airsupport
Regional
2
10-28-2007 04:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices