Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Age 60 Line Checks No More! >

Age 60 Line Checks No More!

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Age 60 Line Checks No More!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2012, 11:46 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

Originally Posted by LowSlowT2 View Post
They see it from their perspective - greed. It's slowing them down and now they won't be able to retire at 60,
That's only a small part of the issue. Here's a slightly different perspective ... I was fortunate enough to have already upgraded to Widebody Capt. prior to the age change. My seniority STOPPED that day, I'm but a few meager percentage points more senior now.

That means that EVERY MONTH I bid for a more junior line than had all the "gummers" (we used to call them ND's or "near deads" at FedEx), I think UAL called them Herpes (can't get rid of them), UPS - Favre's (don't know when it's time to retire) retired and gone away gracefully. It also means that EVERY vacation I bid more junior than if those old farts had simply gone out to pasture (Properly planned for retirement? The FDX guys haven't lost their retirements to CH 11?)

It will also make it more difficult for me to get my "high 5" (our FDX retirement is based on the average of our highest 5 years earnings).

I'm absolutely certain I'll get bashed for my "all about me" rant. To be quite honest, it is. The gummers had their careers, at some point it's time for me to have mine. The senior f/o's that haven't been able to upgrade because of selfish old guys are in a worse situation than I am (trust me guys I get it).

A slightly different twist on the "old guys" sticking around story ... when my legacy carrier shut down, how many over 55 guys (some OVER 60!!!) got in (the seniority) line ahead of us young guys and prevented us (me!) from having a career somewhere else?

So ... I'm sure there are some sad stories out there but how many of the "OVER 60" bunch are sticking around simply because they have no life outside of work ... they have no hobbies, they have no family life, they literally have nothing better to do but stick around and work for half of their pay (they get 50% if they retire, sit at home and eat bon-bons) ... and that my friend is PATHETIC!

(Here's betting JJ will tell me I don't know everyone's situation, he's probably right and FauxHunter has never even tried to make some sorry excuse for his holier-than-thou attitude)
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 11:52 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by HDawg View Post
"Health care is a huge issue for many people. "

This should kill this thread:
I thought we were getting free health care from the government?
Maybe this will help...

Only after we put all the Tea Partiers in jail.
Lippy is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 12:30 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HDawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 356
Default

Lippy

My buddy Elijah Craig disagrees, he says we should donate more PAC money to elect democrats to resolve this whole mess.
HDawg is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 02:20 PM
  #54  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,480
Default

Originally Posted by SenecaII View Post
...well maybe I could have given you a scintilla of respect if you would have made your post under your real handle, rather than hiding under a fake one. 2 posts kinda gives it away.
I hope you're not referring to me. I don't need an alter ego to tell you how I feel about an issue.

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
I'm labeled an someone with entitlement issues simply because I would prefer that my advancement(from retirements)not be bogged down for 5 years. I'm simply stating that it would be nice if I too benefited from Age 60.
Again, you did benefit from it. You wouldn't have even gotten into the profession for five years if the law had been Age 65 when you started. The only people alive today who didn't benefit from Age 60 are 4 years and 2 months old today.

Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
I'm glad you asked ... I'm planning on retiring on my 60th birthday (and I won't have my 25 years in yet). Still married to the original issue wife, still in my f/o house, I own old cars ... I planned my finances correctly and will be able to afford to retire...
...if things go as planned. What if your wife has a stroke? What if you do? Life is full of unforseen glitches. Hopefully, you will be able to execute your plan. If not, and you find you need to work past Age 60, do you instantly become a hypocrite?

Originally Posted by SenecaII View Post
Would sure explain why they are bitter and hate their jobs
Hate to break it to you, Sport, but people who are bitter and hate their jobs....RETIRE or quit.

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76 View Post
Coming here and b*tching about old guys being overdue for retirement at 60 is silly... that ship sailed over 4 years ago.
I guess it makes them feel better, even if their arguments are out to lunch.

Originally Posted by Lemon1 View Post
I benefited from age 60 and don't care what anybody thinks. I needed to work and that was for me to decide.
Good for you. Stay as long as you like. Age 65 is the law and ALL of us have the ability to use it to our benefit.

Originally Posted by MaydayMark View Post
That means that EVERY MONTH I bid for a more junior line than had all the "gummers" retired and gone away gracefully.
EVERYBODY'S "career expectations" stalled regardless of where they are in the profession. Some of us have accepted it and moved on. Apparently, some haven't.
Fishfreighter is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 05:11 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

DLax85, You're right in that my math is a little off. Chalk it up to my advanced age. However, that said, of the approximate 4600 active pilots, just how many are still flying a window seat? I guess, from your point of view, even if only one is still flying, it's too many. Oh well, again I say, perhaps it's time to get over it and move on. Either that, or string those guys up.

Mayday, you're absolutely right in that your "it's-all-about-me" rant will probably make some other guys cringe. Guys who didn't make wide body captain before the age 60 changeover, and who probably won't understand why you would be complaining about having to bid a little more junior for your wide body captain's lines and vacation. As well, they won't understand your comment "The gummers had their careers, at some point it's time for me to have mine.", because to them, you have an absolutely stellar career going. I understand your feelings about the over 60 crowd, because I've read your comments for the past 5 or so years. Again, I'd say, perhaps it's time to get over it and move on, because as I explained to Laughing Jackal, a number of years ago, if one has no control over the outcome of a situation, it's detrimental to ones health to worry about it.

As well, I find your story about "old guys sticking around" somewhat parochial, in that it's not the fault of "older guys" who, upon losing their jobs (along with younger guys), due to an airline shutting down, managed to get hired by another company, before you, thereby preventing you from having the career of your dreams. You might hold the hiring airline accountable for that problem.

And since seniority is the root cause of these issues, how about addressing the way that FedEx assigns seniority numbers. After all, throughout the rest of the entire airline industry, seniority is assigned (within a new hire class) by date of birth, not the way FedEx does it, by the last four of your social security number. This method, in and of itself, can stifle ones career, from date of hire until retirement, effecting everyone in a new hire class except the #1 guy. Theoretically speaking, that is.

SenecaII, please explain your comment, "I agree and am planning the same.....its called being manogamous and living within your means.", because I've got no idea what "manogamous" means. If you're going to use big words, at least spell them correctly, or use spell check.

And as for you LJ, things are going fine with me. I miss the flying and some of the places we went, as well as most of the guys I used to fly with. Miss it all a lot actually. Health-wise, things are fine. The weather here in the North East, this winter has been unbelievable, allowing me to drive around with the top down most of the time. And of course I'm playing a lot of racquetball and squash. Since I saw you last I've won 3 national racquetball titles, so I've got that going for me. However, I'd give it all up in a New York minute, just to be able to hub turn through Memphis again.......NOT.

I hope you're still enjoying the Mad Dog, although it's not in the seat of your choice, and trust that you'll get back to the other side of the cockpit soon. Best regards. I'll give you a call soon, to catch up on old times and to find out when that party will be. I'll be there, as long as I can find my dentures.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 05:57 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LowSlowT2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
You obviously aren't in this business and have the "just happy to be here" mentality. You provide a service to your employer, he pays you. You sign a contract that is supposed to mean something. It's a two sided contract. FDX had no intention of furlough and instead of adhering to the good faith of the contract, decided to find a loop hole to save money. You might be happy with it, but those of us affected probably didn't feel that way. But you'd be happy making pennies on the dollar pleasing your employer..
I'm not certain how you gained that perspective by reading my post. I said nothing of the sort. I understand contracts - I was pre-law (which means I'm too lazy or too dumb to actually go to law school - probably both). I don't claim to speak to what FDX intended or not wrt furlough, but my post was not necessarily specific to FDX. Look at the industry - nobody else pulled off what FDX did when times were tough - they furloughed instead. Apparently, it was in your contract that they could do 4a2b, so they did. I'm sure all the furloughed guys agree with you - better to be collecting unemployment than a reduced guarantee. I didn't say it was good, or I liked it, I was trying to please my employer or even if it was warranted by FDX financials, I said it was better than the alternative.

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
Age 65 is over. It's interesting how you see it as the younger pilots being greedy. Maybe it could be seen as the other way around?
I'm certain it could. Just like the rest of life, it's all about perspective and perception. Perception is reality.

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
In this profession, seniority is vitally important and effects your paycheck and quality of life. I don't like Age 65 and never did. But, it's the law. Those that stay until 65 have every legal right to do so, regardless of their reasons for it. I don't have ill feelings for those that choose to fly until their mandatory retirement age. Hopefully, if I save some money and collect my retirement (which still exists at Fedex), I can afford $900/month. If you can't, you should have hired a financial advisor.
Or perhaps the economy will change radically, or FDX retirement will go away like everyone else's and you won't be able to make it on $900/month and you'll HAVE to fly until you're 65. Hopefully, that won't happen and you can retire when you want to on your terms. I sincerely hope that you are able to.

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
Hopefully, some of us will actually learn from others. Fedex is not exempt from hard times and we may find ourselves in bankruptcy in the next 10-20 years. To not consider that a possibility is foolish, and I believe people should save for their retirement based on this assumption. I've had one pension default, it's quite possible for this one to go the way of the PBGC also.
Sound advice. Nothing is guaranteed. But that is based on the last 10 years of experience - prior to that, the experience said you would be fine living extravagantly and your cushy pension would carry you to your golden years. All of the 'Kit Darby' models said you were going to live high on the hog as long as you wanted. And while that's changed radically in the past decade, it was the status quo for several decades.

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
You are very naive. My guess is that when/if you get hired, your tune will change quickly. You will be less interested in "pleasing" your employer than flying the contract that your airline operates under. Hopefully you will please your employer at a company other than Fedex...
I never said I wanted to please my employer, I said it was my job to make myself valuable to him. There's a huge difference.
LowSlowT2 is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 06:03 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Velcro Captain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757
Posts: 42
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Good to see "Whiner Pilot Central" is alive and well on a Friday night. It's the younger guys I've seen that can't fly their way out of a paper sack. How many over 60 guys have crashed an airplane???

The young pilots I've flown with have all been very good, excellent in fact. Perhaps they are also talented enough to bid around people they don't want to fly with. Thus, it's possible some people aren't aware of the large pool of talented young pilots we have.
Velcro Captain is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 07:22 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,273
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
And since seniority is the root cause of these issues, how about addressing the way that FedEx assigns seniority numbers. After all, throughout the rest of the entire airline industry, seniority is assigned (within a new hire class) by date of birth, not the way FedEx does it, by the last four of your social security number.
Actually, United Airlines assigns seniority numbers by the last 4 of your SSN. Just like us. Except that at UAL 0001 is the highest and 9999 is "The 8 Ball."
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 07:41 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Retired
Posts: 3,717
Default

I stand corrected. Thanks.

JJ
Jetjok is offline  
Old 02-20-2012, 11:42 PM
  #60  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Flyinhigh View Post
What's your plan for health insurance? If you retire at FedEx at age 60, the FedEx Buy Up retiree health care will cost you and your spouse in the neighborhood of $900 per month. The $25K you get at age 59 1/2 from the VEBA fund will only cover about 2.3 years of Health Insurance. I guess you could use TriCare (if you have it) to get you to age 65 but then you would not be eligible for the PRP from ALPA to pay for you and your spouses Medicare Supplement when you turn 65.'
Health care is a huge issue for many people. Why should I retire at age 60 when I can continue to fly and pay $180/month for insurance, work 12 days a month (a little less with vacation/sick leave), and continue to accrue years for retirement (I will have 16 at age 65)?
Everyone's situation is different. I wish you luck with your retirement at age 60 but it just didn't work out for me. Sorry if I am blocking anyone's seat, but I am only playing by the rules that I had absoultely no part in making.
I can make $900/month working at Walmart or Lowes, with less wear and tear on my body.
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
pdo bump
Cargo
70
05-30-2007 06:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices