Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
First MD-80 Cargo Conversion >

First MD-80 Cargo Conversion

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

First MD-80 Cargo Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2012, 01:59 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

the 727 was my first jet,i sat every seat so i am totally biased,but i have a little bit of 9 time and just think Boeing engineering is superior on the turbine side of the house,from the 3 through the 7C ,Douglas ruled the roost.
727C47 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 09:23 AM
  #12  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
skypine27's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: "Part of the problem." : JL
Posts: 1,053
Default

In an airport lounge and bored:

Flown the 737 and 757, A310, and MD-11 (it IS a douglas, right?)

I can say systems-wise the I thought the 737 and 757 were far superior (from a pilots point of view, i.e. simpler) to anything else and also the nicest flying with the A/P off. The MD-11 was the most needlessly complicated plane I've ever flown. The old Bus was somewhere in the middle but flew just fine with the A/P off.
skypine27 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 12:58 PM
  #13  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by skypine27 View Post
In an airport lounge and bored:

Flown the 737 and 757, A310, and MD-11 (it IS a douglas, right?)

I can say systems-wise the I thought the 737 and 757 were far superior (from a pilots point of view, i.e. simpler) to anything else and also the nicest flying with the A/P off. The MD-11 was the most needlessly complicated plane I've ever flown. The old Bus was somewhere in the middle but flew just fine with the A/P off.
What was so "needlessly complicated" about the MD-11? The only thing I found complicated about it was the training at FedEx The plane itself was fine
MaxKts is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 05:27 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Completely agree Maxkts.

The MD-11 systems are FAR superior to the 737 or 757. The automation in the systems is a generation (or two) ahead and easier to interpret. The systems design (especially hydraulics and electrics) is well thought out and the redundancy is superior to anything on those other two aircraft.

Compare a V1 cut on a 757 vs. an MD-11 and you'll quickly see how much more "complicated" one is over another.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 06:40 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by UNDGUY View Post
April 20th 2012

A new freighter type is about to take its first flight: At the Cargo Facts Asia event, Robert Convey, VP Sales and Marketing at AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERS Inc (AEI), reported that flight testing of the prototype AEI MD-80 converted freighter will begin in early May. He also disclosed that Alaska-based Everts Air Cargo will acquire the prototype unit (49470, ex-American Airlines) following completion of certification [FAT 000232]. In addition to Everts, AEI has firm orders for fifteen MD-80SFs from four undisclosed customers. Everts currently operates a thirteen unit freighter fleet, made up of two C-46s, eight DC-6s, one DC-9, and two EMB 120s.

Cargofacts.net
i thought mad dogs were outdated and uneconomical
hickspilot is offline  
Old 05-08-2012, 03:53 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 331
Default

Originally Posted by 727C47 View Post
Douglas for props (hands down), Boeing for jets (hands down), Airbus for nothing (both hands down )
Lockheed for PropJets! Fifty-plus years of continuous production.
ipdanno is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 07:20 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: A220 First Officer
Posts: 569
Default Bringing it back

Just wanted to bring this back to the top since I just made another post about it.
UNDGUY is offline  
Old 11-08-2012, 07:07 PM
  #18  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Smuggler
Posts: 154
Default

Originally Posted by hickspilot View Post
i thought mad dogs were outdated and uneconomical
This is true, the aircraft at Everts are outdated. The procedures at Everts were written by the Wright Brothers. I'm glad I survived that place.
2bennySODC6 is offline  
Old 11-09-2012, 06:27 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by Perm11FO View Post
I think that there was a typo there. When he says "Airbus" I think he means "SCAREBUS." The 380 is a catastrophe waiting to happen. Fortunately, Quantus and others have professional pilots in the driver's seat to handle the issues with the planes....
Posted by a MD11 guy oh the irony
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 11-12-2012, 10:15 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 182
Default

Originally Posted by Perm11FO View Post
Quantus and others have professional pilots in the driver's seat to handle the issues with the planes....
Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial Services

QANTAS

It's not like I've never mispelled that name, but then somebody told me what it stood for, and I've never messed it up since then. Hopefully you take this as me 'paying it forward' and sharing knowledge, rather than a spelling police dick move... I assure you that's not the intent.
CallmeJB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
icarosF1
Foreign
34
09-05-2010 07:51 AM
AirTrucker
Cargo
4
02-22-2010 06:44 PM
StripAlert
Mergers and Acquisitions
354
07-07-2008 08:05 PM
Freighter Captain
Major
24
02-03-2008 08:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices