Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX:  Mmmm, CO2 emissions (Homer-esque) >

FDX: Mmmm, CO2 emissions (Homer-esque)

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX: Mmmm, CO2 emissions (Homer-esque)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013 | 05:52 AM
  #1  
renman95's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Default FDX: Mmmm, CO2 emissions (Homer-esque)

I've noticed recently on my travel invoices that along with my itinerary, seat assignment, meal, equipment and distance is now "CO2 emissions" in pounds. I see that I will "consume" over 1,500 pounds of CO2 on my next deadhead. Why has this been added?

I seem to recall in a version of the Cap-n-Trade bill (2009?) that did not pass that pilots would be taxed on the CO2 they "consume" going to and from work. Is this tax rearing its ugly head somewhere else soon? When I think of tax I think of the IRS which will orchestrate the ACA this October. Is this carbon tax hidden in the Affordable Care Act?
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 07:30 AM
  #2  
FrankTheTank's Avatar
Fill'er Up Again
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 1
From: Scarebus Captain
Default

We have to hurry and pass the bill to see what's in it...
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 07:31 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Flying a desk, for good.
Default

I'm flying to salt lake on delta tomorrow, I just saw the same thing.

In the new rules you will be required to hold your breath during the flight to reduce CO2 emissions.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 07:38 AM
  #4  
Gunter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

I think we should tax health club memberships. You know their CO2 release is waaay up.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 07:45 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Flying a desk, for good.
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
I think we should tax health club memberships. You know their CO2 release is waaay up.
shush, dont give them any ideas.

EPA's Air Pollution Target: Flatulent Cows - CBS News

"For farmers, this stinks: Belching and gaseous cows and hogs could start costing them money if the federal government decides to charge fees for air-polluting animals.

Farmers so far are turning their noses up at the notion, which they contend is a possible consequence of an Environmental Protection Agency report after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that greenhouse gases emitted by belching and flatulence amounts to air pollution."
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
ClutchCargo's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
From: Retired FDX MD11 Capt
Default

I think there is an option to write a check to one Albert Gore Jr. to offset your carbon consumption. Or you could go out and buy a Hummer.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 08:51 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: MEM MD-11 Capt
Default

How does carbon consumption relate to getting a hummer?
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 08:58 AM
  #8  
The Walrus's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Socket Drawer
Default

Lots of hard breathing when I get a hummer.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo
I think there is an option to write a check to one Albert Gore Jr. to offset your carbon consumption. Or you could go out and buy a Hummer.
Which of his three Oceanside mansions do you send the check to? Or do you send it to the one in TN in case of polar ice cap melt?

Last edited by FDXLAG; 06-26-2013 at 09:39 AM.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 09:44 AM
  #10  
Sideshow Bob's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by scubabri
shush, dont give them any ideas.

EPA's Air Pollution Target: Flatulent Cows - CBS News

"For farmers, this stinks: Belching and gaseous cows and hogs could start costing them money if the federal government decides to charge fees for air-polluting animals.

Farmers so far are turning their noses up at the notion, which they contend is a possible consequence of an Environmental Protection Agency report after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that greenhouse gases emitted by belching and flatulence amounts to air pollution."
The EPA is the unelected, unaccountable and all powerful arm of the Eco-Statist movement. They can make ANY new rule they want...they could say humans who don't vote the "correct" way are now a source of pollution and need to be regulated/taxed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices