FDX - What is the penalty ...
#11
trip trading freak
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: MD-11
Posts: 673
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
Guess I am somewhat confused. If you have a separate bid pack, you can still bid the 757 lines. It just wouldn't afford you to potentially not be able to hold the etops stuff. How is that different? Although you may not want the pay, but possibly, everyone would be doing recurrent, vacation and potentially reserve at NB rates. Also as the other a/c go away and more migrate to the airplane, if it is one bid pack, they are gonna come in on top, pushing you further down. The nice 75 lines you hold might have some partial 76 flying on them and then you couldn't hold those either.
How is that better?
#12
Rock: Perhaps my interpretation of a combined bidpack is different than yours. It sounds to me like you think 767 lines would pay wide body and 757 lines would pay narrow.
To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
#13
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
#14
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
#15
Organizational Learning
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
I guess I should have made this a multiple choice question.
What's the penalty for undermanning the B-767 by one pilot?
Is it
A) Two R-24 lines in the B-757 bid period package that pay the B-767 rate
B) One R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate
C) Less than one R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate
I'm not looking for the formula in the LOA -- I want to know the real monetary penalty to The Company. In other words, what is their disincentive under this LOA from undermanning the B-767?
.
What's the penalty for undermanning the B-767 by one pilot?
Is it
A) Two R-24 lines in the B-757 bid period package that pay the B-767 rate
B) One R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate
C) Less than one R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate
I'm not looking for the formula in the LOA -- I want to know the real monetary penalty to The Company. In other words, what is their disincentive under this LOA from undermanning the B-767?
.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Rock,
Guess I am somewhat confused. If you have a separate bid pack, you can still bid the 757 lines. It just wouldn't afford you to potentially not be able to hold the etops stuff. How is that different? Although you may not want the pay, but possibly, everyone would be doing recurrent, vacation and potentially reserve at NB rates. Also as the other a/c go away and more migrate to the airplane, if it is one bid pack, they are gonna come in on top, pushing you further down. The nice 75 lines you hold might have some partial 76 flying on them and then you couldn't hold those either.
How is that better?
Guess I am somewhat confused. If you have a separate bid pack, you can still bid the 757 lines. It just wouldn't afford you to potentially not be able to hold the etops stuff. How is that different? Although you may not want the pay, but possibly, everyone would be doing recurrent, vacation and potentially reserve at NB rates. Also as the other a/c go away and more migrate to the airplane, if it is one bid pack, they are gonna come in on top, pushing you further down. The nice 75 lines you hold might have some partial 76 flying on them and then you couldn't hold those either.
How is that better?
A combined bidpack would allow me to occassionally fly a 76 trip. That's the advantage I'd gain. I would lose percentile seniority in the bidpack. But in a bidpack that contains the current 75 trips, and adds incoming 76 trips, which are going to go more senior? Someone currently bidding 30-40% in the 75 bidpack probably isn't going to see his monthly bid awards change much with an influx of more senior guys moving over to fly the 76. He'll still be flying hubturns to small midwestern airports. But every once in a while, he could break the monotony by picking up a 76 trip out of open time. That opportunity doesn't exist for him in the 76 LOA.
There would certainly be impact on bidding vacation and training, but even as THE most junior guy in the MD-11 bidpack, I was usually able to work family trips around company business. I just couldn't commit to anything on a weekly basis.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
In a combined bidpack, you get paid based on what you fly on each trip. The unanswered question was what reserve, training and vacation would pay.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
When other WB seats start disappearing people will bid what they can hold at the payrate they are comfortable with. I don't really know how that would impact seniority at the higher levels of the 757 right seat.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Rock: Perhaps my interpretation of a combined bidpack is different than yours. It sounds to me like you think 767 lines would pay wide body and 757 lines would pay narrow.
To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
We already gave up city purity 7 years ago...Compare bidpacks before that to now. So now, we should give up aircraft purity? No thanks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post