Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - What is the penalty ... >

FDX - What is the penalty ...

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - What is the penalty ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2013, 08:24 PM
  #11  
trip trading freak
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: MD-11
Posts: 673
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
Rock,
Guess I am somewhat confused. If you have a separate bid pack, you can still bid the 757 lines. It just wouldn't afford you to potentially not be able to hold the etops stuff. How is that different? Although you may not want the pay, but possibly, everyone would be doing recurrent, vacation and potentially reserve at NB rates. Also as the other a/c go away and more migrate to the airplane, if it is one bid pack, they are gonna come in on top, pushing you further down. The nice 75 lines you hold might have some partial 76 flying on them and then you couldn't hold those either.

How is that better?
Pakagecheck is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 08:24 PM
  #12  
Proponent of Hysteria
 
FXDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: 3B
Posts: 1,052
Default

Rock: Perhaps my interpretation of a combined bidpack is different than yours. It sounds to me like you think 767 lines would pay wide body and 757 lines would pay narrow.

To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
FXDX is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 08:26 PM
  #13  
Part Time Employee
 
MaxKts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
What do you think will happen when the other WB seats start disappearing?
MaxKts is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 08:39 PM
  #14  
...Whatever It Is!
 
MD11Fr8Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,680
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
How many guys senior enough to bid WB pay in a combined 75/76 bidpack would bid a 75 line? Probably not enough to make a guy currently sitting relatively senior in the 75 junior. Again, that is assuming most guys are chasing the buck.
The current 75 lines won't go away with a combined 75/76 bidpack. I'm not seeing a rush by too many senior guys to move to the 75 to fly them.
Why don't we just lower the 757 pay rate, that would make it go even more junior and really help your relative seniority.
MD11Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 08:47 PM
  #15  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

I guess I should have made this a multiple choice question.

What's the penalty for undermanning the B-767 by one pilot?

Is it

A) Two R-24 lines in the B-757 bid period package that pay the B-767 rate

B) One R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate

C) Less than one R-24 line in the B-757 bid period package that pays the B-767 rate



I'm not looking for the formula in the LOA -- I want to know the real monetary penalty to The Company. In other words, what is their disincentive under this LOA from undermanning the B-767?






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 08:53 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by Pakagecheck View Post
Rock,
Guess I am somewhat confused. If you have a separate bid pack, you can still bid the 757 lines. It just wouldn't afford you to potentially not be able to hold the etops stuff. How is that different? Although you may not want the pay, but possibly, everyone would be doing recurrent, vacation and potentially reserve at NB rates. Also as the other a/c go away and more migrate to the airplane, if it is one bid pack, they are gonna come in on top, pushing you further down. The nice 75 lines you hold might have some partial 76 flying on them and then you couldn't hold those either.

How is that better?
In a separate bid pack I can ONLY bid the 757 lines. And unless I bid reserve or get drafted to a 76 trip, I will never fly the 76. I'm not going to find a crashpad and start bidding reserve on the off chance a rogue 76 trip gets tossed my way, and I don't take draft trips. So in a separate bidpack, I have almost zero chance of ever flying the 76.
A combined bidpack would allow me to occassionally fly a 76 trip. That's the advantage I'd gain. I would lose percentile seniority in the bidpack. But in a bidpack that contains the current 75 trips, and adds incoming 76 trips, which are going to go more senior? Someone currently bidding 30-40% in the 75 bidpack probably isn't going to see his monthly bid awards change much with an influx of more senior guys moving over to fly the 76. He'll still be flying hubturns to small midwestern airports. But every once in a while, he could break the monotony by picking up a 76 trip out of open time. That opportunity doesn't exist for him in the 76 LOA.
There would certainly be impact on bidding vacation and training, but even as THE most junior guy in the MD-11 bidpack, I was usually able to work family trips around company business. I just couldn't commit to anything on a weekly basis.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:01 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
Rock: Perhaps my interpretation of a combined bidpack is different than yours. It sounds to me like you think 767 lines would pay wide body and 757 lines would pay narrow.
That would be my assumption. And that was the assumption of the post I first responded to.
In a combined bidpack, you get paid based on what you fly on each trip. The unanswered question was what reserve, training and vacation would pay.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:04 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts View Post
What do you think will happen when the other WB seats start disappearing?
When other WB seats start disappearing people will bid what they can hold at the payrate they are comfortable with. I don't really know how that would impact seniority at the higher levels of the 757 right seat.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:08 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by MD11Fr8Dog View Post
Why don't we just lower the 757 pay rate, that would make it go even more junior and really help your relative seniority.
Unless they move it to Hong Kong, I don't think it could go anymore junior.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:17 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FXDX View Post
Rock: Perhaps my interpretation of a combined bidpack is different than yours. It sounds to me like you think 767 lines would pay wide body and 757 lines would pay narrow.

To me a combined bidpack is the trips pay whatever the guy who bids them holds (widebody or narrow body pay), regardless of which aircraft is flown. So the top 20% of the seniority list in each seat (percentage just for argument sake) gets widebody pay but can bid whatever line they prefer, be it 757 or 767. That is a combined bidpack to me, and would be a double whammy to those chasing quality of life, which was your stated objective.
A combined bidpack would most likely not have widebody lines and narrowbody lines. It would have trips that consist of both 757 and 767 legs. I may be wrong, but most airlines then pay the crew the rate for the type of aircraft they actually flew on those legs.

We already gave up city purity 7 years ago...Compare bidpacks before that to now. So now, we should give up aircraft purity? No thanks.
Busboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoro
Cargo
32
07-26-2012 06:32 AM
vagabond
Cargo
83
07-14-2010 07:27 AM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
Cargo
61
03-19-2009 08:40 AM
fedupbusdriver
Cargo
13
03-06-2008 12:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices