Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Posting 13-03 is out.. Let the Excesses begin >

Posting 13-03 is out.. Let the Excesses begin

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Posting 13-03 is out.. Let the Excesses begin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2013, 04:40 AM
  #231  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFDX View Post
I disagree. Where in the scheduling email did they reference that if it doesn't work out and it doesn't look like you will get the FEPP as you expected you can always decline and remain set locked for two years?

I really hated this email from ALPA. It is almost like the FCIF from JB on the HKG domicile flying.

The biggest winner's in all this are the bottom 500 thousand number guys on the FEPP list. They will be getting that money for years without going. Good on them for knowing the contract better than I did years ago.
That statement does not make any sense to me? How does any advice or recommendation change people's rights to get onto the FDA passover program? If you are insinuating that fewer people will try and game the system then the 500 thousand guys have even a better chance to go to the FDA because they have to bid it and will have less competition, right?

If you want to go to t he FDA, bid it, pretty simple. If you get denied the award the CBA provides a remedy for that scenario. As TonyC says, "know your CBA", that includes turning down an award, but I read the Scheduling advice as geared toward those who want to go to the FDA and just threw in a recommendation for those not considering actually going, and those people I have a feeling have a plan in place and know the CBA better than someone just simply bidding to go to a seat. YMMV.
4A2B is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 04:56 AM
  #232  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFDX View Post
Why no email form the ALPA or the company explaining how they were able to do vacancy and excess postings at the same time in the past?

Where is the explanation from contract enforcement on that one?
Just a guess, but they might be sending out a lot of emails to explain things that are being done that are legal per the CBA? We may not like the excuse or way the Company is handling it but they are following the CBA nonetheless.

I personally spend more time on my monthly bid than time on my system bid. Putting together a list of aircraft, seat, domicile and possibly percentage bidding that you want to fly is not that difficult and most of us have been doing that sort of thing our whole career.
4A2B is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 04:59 AM
  #233  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,804
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B View Post
That statement does not make any sense to me? How does any advice or recommendation change people's rights to get onto the FDA passover program? If you are insinuating that fewer people will try and game the system then the 500 thousand guys have even a better chance to go to the FDA because they have to bid it and will have less competition, right?

If you want to go to t he FDA, bid it, pretty simple. If you get denied the award the CBA provides a remedy for that scenario. As TonyC says, "know your CBA", that includes turning down an award, but I read the Scheduling advice as geared toward those who want to go to the FDA and just threw in a recommendation for those not considering actually going, and those people I have a feeling have a plan in place and know the CBA better than someone just simply bidding to go to a seat. YMMV.

It doesn't change the rights at all. I just think the email from ALPA only painted one side of the picture and emphasized only a portion of the contract. They didn't fully explain how you could be entitled to FEPP, and still say no before receiving any monies.

I was not insinuating that at all. My point was that the 500 thousand number guys currently on the list knew the contract very well and have used it to their advantage. I do not know if the bid it knowing they would never have to go or if they truly wanted to go at the time. My point is that I believe there are enough pilots that want to go and therefore the pilots towards the bottom of the FEPP list will never have to go.

I just think ALPA did not paint the whole picture.
USMCFDX is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 07:20 AM
  #234  
Organizational Learning 
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63 View Post

Just when I thought we had the old Tony back. This was a pretty disengenuous quote you posted.

I had to go reread the ALPA email to see if what you put in quotes was what was said. It wasn't.

It is quite telling that you considered the possibility that those were the Chairman's actual words, even to the point of going to check them against the original. I had hoped that they would be so far-fetched that you would instantly recognize the sarcasm.

Sarcasm loses its effectiveness when it has to be explained.

I'm sorry if I confused you.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 07:54 AM
  #235  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
You know, the more I think about this, the angrier I get. This isn't just a case of advising "the individual Union to consider their options." The advice from the Scheduling Committee is, "We would not recommend submitting a bid for the sole purpose of achieving passover pay." (emphasis mine)

So, since when did the Scheduling Committee start giving advice on Section 24, Filling of Vacancies? Maybe they can give us advice on selecting the right auto insurance or where to get the best deal on a college education.

.
Well, Tony, for you the advice is not required. You are fully versed on the rules and make excellent decisions when protecting your career. (No sarcasm)

Besides YOU, there are 4600 other pilots at FedEx. Not all of them can fly a trip with you and get edumacated. Many are very inexperienced in how things work or, quite frankly, aren't as good at making life decisions. Unlike you some ARE seeking advice. I suspect a large number need advice and don't even know it.

So....Instead of watching a few bid blindly the LEADERSHIP is trying to keep them out of trouble with simple advice. Those that only like to read the cliff notes will get the most benefit. I like that we are trying to take care of our own. If they are smart enough to effectively work out their options, they are smart enough to know the advice given is merely a sure way to stay out of trouble.

Even those who don't give a hoot about them should be happy advice coming from Poplar and Kirby may prevent a large expenditure of union funds defending those who don't think out the risks.

We get it Tony. If you were MEC Chairman you would marginalize all committee Chairs and be the expert on everything.

Last edited by Gunter; 04-25-2013 at 08:29 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 07:57 AM
  #236  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Admittedly, I have often disagreed with Tony. That said, I very much appreciate his sharing of knowledge on the FEPP situation. I read the contract, but the practical application is difficult at times. I'm a pilot, not a lawyer, and this thing can be almost impossible to interpret at times..

Despite what the union wants, I will be bidding the FDA for PAY PURPOSES. If my turn comes up to go, I'll think about it when/if it happens. We've had some guys on the list for years and they've probably made 200-300k from this. And I won't feel bad about it. The company didn't feel bad when they took a well meaning contract clause and decided to turn it upside down ( 4.A.2b.). It's just business. They don't mind changing the way they dealt with accepted fares to save money. Again, it's just business.

I don't see a real downside to bidding the FDA. If they see 100 guys on the list, it may make them discover the ease of a single pay rate or the viability of the FDAs. It may also encourage them to make the deal better, not seek witch hunts, and to remember the value of good will with their pilots...
golfandfly is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 08:05 AM
  #237  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
It is quite telling that you considered the possibility that those were the Chairman's actual words, even to the point of going to check them against the original. I had hoped that they would be so far-fetched that you would instantly recognize the sarcasm.

.
It's quite telling that someone who threatened me with legal action from a misquote would so carelessly throw words around.

Your selective memory, revisionist history and awkward spin on message lines reveals much.

Last edited by Gunter; 04-25-2013 at 08:20 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 08:17 AM
  #238  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
.

Despite what the union wants, I will be bidding the FDA for PAY PURPOSES. If my turn comes up to go, I'll think about it when/if it happens. We've had some guys on the list for years and they've probably made 200-300k from this. And I won't feel bad about it. The company didn't feel bad when they took a well meaning contract clause and decided to turn it upside down ( 4.A.2b.). It's just business. They don't mind changing the way they dealt with accepted fares to save money. Again, it's just business.

I don't see a real downside to bidding the FDA. If they see 100 guys on the list, it may make them discover the ease of a single pay rate or the viability of the FDAs. It may also encourage them to make the deal better, not seek witch hunts, and to remember the value of good will with their pilots...
I don't know of anyone in the union who doesn't want you to bid the way you want to bid. As long as you are of the right frame of mind to do so.

You're absolutely right. It's just business. Any hint from a manager that you are gaming the system should trigger a discussion about 4a2b implementation, 727 SO excess bid meant to replace a vacancy bid, accepted fares and various scheduling shenanigans that involve lying and deceit. When they game the system they say, "A contract is a contract". That should be our response too.

Last edited by Gunter; 04-25-2013 at 08:29 AM.
Gunter is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 08:28 AM
  #239  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 556
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly View Post
.

Despite what the union wants, I will be bidding the FDA for PAY PURPOSES. If my turn comes up to go, I'll think about it when/if it happens. We've had some guys on the list for years and they've probably made 200-300k from this. And I won't feel bad about it. The company didn't feel bad when they took a well meaning contract clause and decided to turn it upside down ( 4.A.2b.). It's just business. They don't mind changing the way they dealt with accepted fares to save money. Again, it's just business.

I don't see a real downside to bidding the FDA. If they see 100 guys on the list, it may make them discover the ease of a single pay rate or the viability of the FDAs. It may also encourage them to make the deal better, not seek witch hunts, and to remember the value of good will with their pilots...
The Union does not want you to not bid an FDA, in fact ALPA does like higher dues, right? The advice is meant to help people avoid a situation that could be troublesome to them and their families if not completely thought through.

If some decide not to bid it for those reasons then that is even better for you. You will have less people in your way to either get the actual seat or you will be on passover sooner with less people in front of you on the virtual training letter, bonus for you!
4A2B is offline  
Old 04-25-2013, 08:43 AM
  #240  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by 4A2B View Post
The Union does not want you to not bid an FDA, in fact ALPA does like higher dues, right? The advice is meant to help people avoid a situation that could be troublesome to them and their families if not completely thought through.

If some decide not to bid it for those reasons then that is even better for you. You will have less people in your way to either get the actual seat or you will be on passover sooner with less people in front of you on the virtual training letter, bonus for you!
What's the troublesome part? Payback? You have the contractual right to choose to change your mind if you want. What's the downside?
golfandfly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HerkDriver
Cargo
139
01-12-2008 02:15 PM
Canyonman
Cargo
43
10-12-2007 08:40 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
02-20-2007 02:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices