FDX be afraid of PBS and management
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Bent over by Terrible Agreement
I was in training this week and heard some ungodly rumors about PBS.
Specifically a 20% raise if we accept PBS.
With all the folks who have less in 10 years to go, we are all screwed because you know they're voting yes.
The word is that PBS's a dealbreaker for the company and 20% is on the table I wonder how this is going to go?
Specifically a 20% raise if we accept PBS.
With all the folks who have less in 10 years to go, we are all screwed because you know they're voting yes.
The word is that PBS's a dealbreaker for the company and 20% is on the table I wonder how this is going to go?
#3
I agree with Huck, automatic NO vote for me. Not even for 50% more. Seriously. I have lived the transition from line bidding to PBS, twice. I have also lived the transition for flight attendants from line bidding to PBS. Every time, it sucked, for 95% of the folks. Vacation, training, reserve, everything, was a concession on QOL. Not worth any type of money to give up that amount of QOL.
#4
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Bent over by Terrible Agreement
This is not drama, I heard this from a solid source.
My question is, why haven't we heard this earlier from the union folks?
If this is accurate, I believe it is, why havent the union folks pre warned? Why am I paying dues?
With 18 -20% on the table then my belief is that most of the senior guys would be willing to suffer a few years of misery for the $.....we are screwed!
My question is, why haven't we heard this earlier from the union folks?
If this is accurate, I believe it is, why havent the union folks pre warned? Why am I paying dues?
With 18 -20% on the table then my belief is that most of the senior guys would be willing to suffer a few years of misery for the $.....we are screwed!
#6
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Bent over by Terrible Agreement
Oh, our vacation is gone entirely.....
We bid 15 days vacation, great.....no sliding, no expanding...the company will give the days off and then you get to work the other 15 days that month.
Management can offer 18-20% because its cost neutral or better.....
My guess is way better in the short and long run.
VOTE NO!
We bid 15 days vacation, great.....no sliding, no expanding...the company will give the days off and then you get to work the other 15 days that month.
Management can offer 18-20% because its cost neutral or better.....
My guess is way better in the short and long run.
VOTE NO!
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Oh, our vacation is gone entirely.....
We bid 15 days vacation, great.....no sliding, no expanding...the company will give the days off and then you get to work the other 15 days that month.
Management can offer 18-20% because its cost neutral or better.....
My guess is way better in the short and long run.
VOTE NO!
We bid 15 days vacation, great.....no sliding, no expanding...the company will give the days off and then you get to work the other 15 days that month.
Management can offer 18-20% because its cost neutral or better.....
My guess is way better in the short and long run.
VOTE NO!
I don't want PBS but I can't believe you cant have work rules that allow sliding and expansion.
#8
Hey Irish....How about voicing an opinion but cut the "we are all screwed because you know they're voting yes" crap. Stop dividing the crew force. I know lots of senior guys and not one has voiced that they would vote for PBS for ANYTHING....
PBS is a no vote...period.
PBS is a no vote...period.
#9
This is not drama, I heard this from a solid source.
My question is, why haven't we heard this earlier from the union folks?
If this is accurate, I believe it is, why havent the union folks pre warned? Why am I paying dues?
With 18 -20% on the table then my belief is that most of the senior guys would be willing to suffer a few years of misery for the $.....we are screwed!
My question is, why haven't we heard this earlier from the union folks?
If this is accurate, I believe it is, why havent the union folks pre warned? Why am I paying dues?
With 18 -20% on the table then my belief is that most of the senior guys would be willing to suffer a few years of misery for the $.....we are screwed!
Now, management comes to you with a rumor (yes, it was management who came to you with that rumor) and the expectation (nay, certain knowledge), that you or one of your fellow rumor recipients will come here and spread it. This hopefully to get a "That sounds like a good deal" discussion going, but as a minimum, to spread the "Why haven't we heard this from ALPA" dissension. This is known as "direct dealing." And you dutifully did exactly what management wanted you to do.
What part of "My Negotiating Committee Speaks For Me" is unclear?
I fully expect that the NC will bring me a TA without PBS in it. If they fail in that, and instead bring one that DOES have PBS, we vote it down, send in a new Negotiating Committee, and hopefully, take a strike authorization vote.
Until that comes to pass, however, keep your panties unknotted, let the NC do it's job, and stop rising to management's bait.


