Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX....an excellent word >

FDX....an excellent word

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX....an excellent word

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2013 | 06:39 AM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 2
From: MD11 FO
Default

Originally Posted by golfandfly
I agree 100% They know this is a nonstarter. Watch out for the healthcare and scope concessions that they are looking for.

Sure they'd love pref bidding, but they also know it wouldn't be ratified... They are looking elsewhere while we are focusing on PIBS...
+1

But they won't get that either!
Reply
Old 09-18-2013 | 06:51 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by seefive
+1

But they won't get that either!

I say the company really wants nothing. They want to stall until Obamacare gets sorted out. Maybe big labor will get exempted (like congress) from the law they wanted. The company has already decided how big a slice of the pie they are willing to give us. They have to wait to find out how much of that slice is eaten up by health care expense. It could be in our interests to wait also. Meanwhile they throw out some bait to figure out how much it will cost them to reduce pilot requirements by 10%.

This theory also explains our last 2 year extension, cost the company nothing and gained them a lot of time.
Reply
Old 09-18-2013 | 08:24 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
I say the company really wants nothing. They want to stall until Obamacare gets sorted out. Maybe big labor will get exempted (like congress) from the law they wanted. The company has already decided how big a slice of the pie they are willing to give us. They have to wait to find out how much of that slice is eaten up by health care expense. It could be in our interests to wait also. Meanwhile they throw out some bait to figure out how much it will cost them to reduce pilot requirements by 10%.

This theory also explains our last 2 year extension, cost the company nothing and gained them a lot of time.
actually cost them 6% by your logic they would still be in delay mode (which I agree is the case) and we would be on the "retro pay" stickers by now. Instead we have very little retro pay to worry about at this point and the new pay rates will be based on a 6% higher base rather than being tacked onto the OLD rates with retro/bonus. Healthcare will be a big sticking point but we are a small fraction of the FDX healthcare dollar so they can impose on the rest and leave us under the status quo without much concern in the new CBA.
Reply
Old 09-18-2013 | 10:55 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default

Add Content
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
NoHaz
Cargo
6
04-04-2010 09:21 PM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
4
01-30-2010 07:46 PM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
06-01-2006 12:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices