UPS Hiring FQS
05-24-2014, 08:47 AM
#151
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
05-24-2014, 08:49 AM
#152
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: 737-Right
Posts: 781
Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
05-24-2014, 08:54 AM
#153
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
05-24-2014, 09:18 AM
#154
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: B717
Posts: 56
Oh yea, now I remember that from my first class in av management. Very restrictive and hard to justify a strike.
On the surface it seems simple enough, the use of the FQS, but since they lack credibility it seems such a position is only being used to undermine the power of the IPA (even if they did agree to it) and therefore the QOL of the line pilots as a whole.
You know, an idea is a dangerous thing, and if the internal support is there to make the vote happen. Batten down the hatches and get ready to go to war, so to speak.
When is the next round of contract negotiations supposed to start?
On the surface it seems simple enough, the use of the FQS, but since they lack credibility it seems such a position is only being used to undermine the power of the IPA (even if they did agree to it) and therefore the QOL of the line pilots as a whole.
You know, an idea is a dangerous thing, and if the internal support is there to make the vote happen. Batten down the hatches and get ready to go to war, so to speak.
When is the next round of contract negotiations supposed to start?
05-24-2014, 09:27 AM
#155
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: MD11 CPT
Posts: 1,077
Originally Posted by jkhill0
Oh yea, now I remember that from my first class in av management. Very restrictive and hard to justify a strike.
On the surface it seems simple enough, the use of the FQS, but since they lack credibility it seems such a position is only being used to undermine the power of the IPA (even if they did agree to it) and therefore the QOL of the line pilots as a whole.
You know, an idea is a dangerous thing, and if the internal support is there to make the vote happen. Batten down the hatches and get ready to go to war, so to speak.
When is the next round of contract negotiations supposed to start?
On the surface it seems simple enough, the use of the FQS, but since they lack credibility it seems such a position is only being used to undermine the power of the IPA (even if they did agree to it) and therefore the QOL of the line pilots as a whole.
You know, an idea is a dangerous thing, and if the internal support is there to make the vote happen. Batten down the hatches and get ready to go to war, so to speak.
When is the next round of contract negotiations supposed to start?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
