Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Hiring FQS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2014 | 11:54 AM
  #151  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Horse S---
Reply
Old 05-21-2014 | 12:07 PM
  #152  
HDawg's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by aflouisville
Horse S---
They like to be called prostitutes
Reply
Old 05-21-2014 | 12:12 PM
  #153  
Pilot7576's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by aflouisville
No FQS has been involved in an accident
FQSs have the highest incidence of violations...just how do you get a rwy incursion in PHL? How does FH get violated during a crossing? Is it because of their "superior airmanship"? Flt 6 is laid at ups doorstep because of their failure to install EVAS on aircraft that are carrying the most dangersous material shipped...lithium metal batteries. I heard that because they are self-insured, ups actually made money from this crash.

The DC8 into PHL should have been a wakeup call for EVAS and was instead ignored by these "superior airmen." I remember Pet Rock turning a 757 90 degrees at 30 kts groundspeed...how safe it that? I was shocked beyond words and was grateful the gear held.

The only reason FQS hasn't had a major accident (unless you count the MD11 they bent to hell) is because they cherry pick their flying to fly the least hazardous/tiring pairings to get their flying. When have you EVER seen a FQS operating 3 SDF-ABQ-PHX-SDF in a row? Never...but they consider that "safe" for a line guy.

Your prissy superiority being "promoted" into management is actually sickening. What is worse is when you start believing that maybe you are "more talented" than a line guy. What you guys do is backstab your union brethren to get to the left seat early. Well, you guys may be in the left seat, but you're not capts in my book

Pilot7576
Reply
Old 05-21-2014 | 12:19 PM
  #154  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

I have heard that the A300 Training people are quite good.
Reply
Old 05-21-2014 | 04:03 PM
  #155  
CactusCrew's Avatar
Tri-tanic operator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
From: Doggie
Default

Originally Posted by aflouisville
Meant 1 "chargeable" accident. Dubai was not UPS's fault. BHM will come down as a chargeable accident. Probably 95% crew error.
You sir, are an idiot to even think this.
Reply
Old 05-24-2014 | 08:45 AM
  #156  
jkhill0's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: B717
Default

Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.

If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
Reply
Old 05-24-2014 | 08:47 AM
  #157  
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
From: Brown
Default

Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.

If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
We are........
Reply
Old 05-24-2014 | 08:49 AM
  #158  
Loon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: 737-Right
Default

Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.

If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
Why don't we have sideshow mel tell you all about it......
Reply
Old 05-24-2014 | 08:54 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by jkhill0
Please educate the active duty USAF pilot who is getting ready to transition to the civilian flying world.

If the FQS positions are so full of controversy, then why doesn't the union go to the mat with management during the next contract negotiations?
Unlike say the UAW or a public sector union the RLA is very restrictive on labor and as such Management has the bigger hammer. The only going to the mat is essentially agreeing to binding arbitration or waiting 10 years to get permission to strike.
Reply
Old 05-24-2014 | 09:18 AM
  #160  
jkhill0's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: B717
Default

Oh yea, now I remember that from my first class in av management. Very restrictive and hard to justify a strike.

On the surface it seems simple enough, the use of the FQS, but since they lack credibility it seems such a position is only being used to undermine the power of the IPA (even if they did agree to it) and therefore the QOL of the line pilots as a whole.

You know, an idea is a dangerous thing, and if the internal support is there to make the vote happen. Batten down the hatches and get ready to go to war, so to speak.

When is the next round of contract negotiations supposed to start?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD90PIC
Cargo
209
05-24-2021 06:56 AM
Priority 3
Cargo
7
04-12-2012 04:02 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM
FlyingGorilla
Cargo
2
03-05-2006 09:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices