Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Amazon Fined For Sending 'Liquid Fire' on UPS >

Amazon Fined For Sending 'Liquid Fire' on UPS

Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Amazon Fined For Sending 'Liquid Fire' on UPS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2016 | 02:12 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Post Amazon Fined For Sending 'Liquid Fire' on UPS

The FAA has ruled that Amazon will face a $350,000 fine for shipping a one-gallon container of "Amazing Liquid Fire" by air. The corrosive drain cleaner was sent by air from Louisville, Kentucky, to Boulder, Colorado, on October 15, 2014. The container leaked during transit and nine UPS employees came into contact with the chemical, which caused a "burning sensation on their skin" that had to be treated with a chemical wash. According to Computerworld, "The FAA ruled the shipment wasn't packaged properly, wasn't accompanied by a declaration of dangerous goods, and was not properly marked or labeled as a hazardous package. It also said Amazon didn't provide emergency response information with the package and had not provided hazardous material training to employees who handled the package." The FAA said in a statement, "Amazon has a history of violating the Hazardous Materials Regulations." They apparently violated the rules 24 other times.


SOURCE:
https://science.slashdot.org/story/1...ng-liquid-fire
Old 06-14-2016 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Left seat of a Jet
Default

Originally Posted by MartinBishop
The FAA has ruled that Amazon will face a $350,000 fine for shipping a one-gallon container of "Amazing Liquid Fire" by air. The corrosive drain cleaner was sent by air from Louisville, Kentucky, to Boulder, Colorado, on October 15, 2014. The container leaked during transit and nine UPS employees came into contact with the chemical, which caused a "burning sensation on their skin" that had to be treated with a chemical wash. According to Computerworld, "The FAA ruled the shipment wasn't packaged properly, wasn't accompanied by a declaration of dangerous goods, and was not properly marked or labeled as a hazardous package. It also said Amazon didn't provide emergency response information with the package and had not provided hazardous material training to employees who handled the package." The FAA said in a statement, "Amazon has a history of violating the Hazardous Materials Regulations." They apparently violated the rules 24 other times.


SOURCE:
https://science.slashdot.org/story/1...ng-liquid-fire
FAA was just putting the welcome mat out for the newest cargo player. Welcome Amazon!
Old 06-14-2016 | 07:16 PM
  #3  
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
Default

Can the injured workers also civil sue Amazon?

Undeclared hazardous cargo is the biggest danger in the cargo world.
Old 06-14-2016 | 08:05 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
Can the injured workers also civil sue Amazon?

Undeclared hazardous cargo is the biggest danger in the cargo world.
In a civilized society, that money from the FAA fine would have gone straight to the workers instead of disappearing into the the general fund to be spent on government nonners.

Welcome to the airline industry, Amazon.
Old 06-15-2016 | 03:13 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

That $350K penalty is not even a slap on the wrist to Amazon. It won't stop them from doing that again. It's all about the bucks and getting their product to the end user asap. Be careful out there.
Old 06-15-2016 | 05:10 AM
  #6  
FlyAstarJets's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Frm. DHLAirways. Blue & White Boeing's Now. YEA!!
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
That $350K penalty is not even a slap on the wrist to Amazon. It won't stop them from doing that again. It's all about the bucks and getting their product to the end user asap. Be careful out there.
While operating the first flight out of KABE to KILN, bunch of Amazon people were there. Struck up a conversation with starry eyed 30 something mid mgt type who said "this is so cool, I don't know why we don't have our own airline."
I just smiled and said all the right non-commital type things.
On the inside I'm thinking "be careful what you wish for."

What JJ said holds true for all of us. To them, it's only money. For us...... well you all know what I mean.

Amazon MIGHT get there someday, but not without years and a serious learning curve along the way.

Be Safe out there,

FAJ
Old 06-15-2016 | 06:49 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Captain
Default

On the contrary, no learning curve needed. Pretty much just buy an existing airline and paint the airplanes.
Old 06-15-2016 | 06:56 AM
  #8  
Kougarok's Avatar
El Capitan
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Checked in
On the contrary, no learning curve needed. Pretty much just buy an existing airline and paint the airplanes.
This is what I've been thinking.... It wouldn't suprise me if they bought ATI or ABX. I am not sure which one I would prefer they buy...
Old 06-15-2016 | 07:23 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Default

Hopefully ATI....Bezos will get his cheap work force and we won't have to worry about merger details. Best for all.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MD90PIC
Cargo
209
05-24-2021 06:56 AM
Thunder1
Cargo
55
01-05-2016 06:51 PM
Ernst
Cargo
148
07-08-2010 06:04 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-11-2005 08:59 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices