A330-200 freighter mod?
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
Don't know much about Airbus aircraft, so how does an A330-200 compare to a 767 or a 777? Something in-between?
Just curious if this mod would be something fdx and ups might be interested in?
(I'm hoping they'd pick 767s or 777s instead.)
https://airwaysmag.com/industry/efw-...-200p2f-order/
Just curious if this mod would be something fdx and ups might be interested in?
(I'm hoping they'd pick 767s or 777s instead.)
https://airwaysmag.com/industry/efw-...-200p2f-order/
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 0
From: 1559
It compares very favorably to the 767 except it takes up more ramp space with it's longer wingspan.
Curious why you'd rather have 76 or 77?
Airbus produced A330 freighters, but it required a bulbous nose gear pod. Airbus resisted doing a real P2F mod for years, instead wanting buyers to purchase new production freighters. Not until Al Baker at Emirates and FedEx started buying Boeing freighters did Airbus finally realize they needed to produce a mod. The other motivation for them now is that, if there is a market for a pax 330 to be converted, then those pax airlines can buy a new production A350 and find a buyer for the used A330.
The problem with the A330 is it has a nose down stance on the ramp. So, the production freighter had the nose gear attachment point lowered and to accommodate that, they have the pod under the nose. The question is, how has Airbus addressed this in the P2F? Rumor is they are going to use a powered roller system. That creates issues for FedEx. If that system breaks down, it will become very hard to load the aircraft.
Curious why you'd rather have 76 or 77?
Airbus produced A330 freighters, but it required a bulbous nose gear pod. Airbus resisted doing a real P2F mod for years, instead wanting buyers to purchase new production freighters. Not until Al Baker at Emirates and FedEx started buying Boeing freighters did Airbus finally realize they needed to produce a mod. The other motivation for them now is that, if there is a market for a pax 330 to be converted, then those pax airlines can buy a new production A350 and find a buyer for the used A330.
The problem with the A330 is it has a nose down stance on the ramp. So, the production freighter had the nose gear attachment point lowered and to accommodate that, they have the pod under the nose. The question is, how has Airbus addressed this in the P2F? Rumor is they are going to use a powered roller system. That creates issues for FedEx. If that system breaks down, it will become very hard to load the aircraft.
Last edited by MX727; 07-18-2016 at 07:03 AM.
#5
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



