Notices
Charter Part 121 pax charter airlines

JSX under attack

Old 07-08-2023 | 08:28 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Post JSX under attack

https://onemileatatime.com/news/jsx-...usiness-model/
Reply
Old 07-08-2023 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 331
Likes: 2
Default

Once again, ALPA is working FOR the airline management.

JSX must be costing someone some money.
Reply
Old 07-09-2023 | 11:05 PM
  #3  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by AA717driver
Once again, ALPA is working FOR the airline management.

JSX must be costing someone some money.
uhhhhhh no.
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 02:21 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by AA717driver
Once again, ALPA is working FOR the airline management.
What does "working for" mean in your world?
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
MinRest's Avatar
Mmmm wine
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 410
From: The Jet
Default

Originally Posted by AA717driver
Once again, ALPA is working FOR the airline management.

JSX must be costing someone some money.
Correction, JSX is skirting regs which goes semi-under the radar and ALPA has a problem with it. Just wait until a big red-striped airplane augers into a residential neighborhood, and the traveling public finds out the hard way that they don't have to hire or train to standards that they think JSX does...
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 04:22 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Question

Originally Posted by MinRest
Correction, JSX is skirting regs.
How are they skirting the regs if they are doing what the law allows?
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 04:54 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
How are they skirting the regs if they are doing what the law allows?
It's unknown whether the law allows or disallows what they're doing. The courts or a regulator will need to get involved. However, it can be safely assumed the intent of the regulation (which isn't itself a law) wasn't to allow front companies owned by a single holding company to "ease" their certification process with technicalities.
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 06:04 PM
  #8  
CaptainJay's Avatar
Missing from the Crashpad
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 134
Likes: 2
From: Recliner
Default

Originally Posted by 4dalulz
It's unknown whether the law allows or disallows what they're doing. The courts or a regulator will need to get involved.
It’s not unknown. ITS COMPLETELY LEGAL. 14CFR part 380 if memory serves. The public exemption charter has been around for years. I worked for a 135 outfit that did the same thing JSX is doing back in 2011 flying 2x a day between TTN and BED selling 99$ seats. The FAA ramped us every other day or so, but never once found an issue. You could sense they didn’t care for it but they also knew it was legal, and said as much. We spent our 10 minutes together, shook hands and went on our way. In the end the business model failed, the subsidiary closed and we moved on to strictly charter until becoming a 121 carrier. Seems like JSX has figured out how to make the model work better than they did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streamline_Air

Last edited by CaptainJay; 07-10-2023 at 06:47 PM.
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 06:58 PM
  #9  
CaptainJay's Avatar
Missing from the Crashpad
 
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 134
Likes: 2
From: Recliner
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Correction, JSX is skirting regs which goes semi-under the radar and ALPA has a problem with it...
You might want to do some research. I recommend reading 14CFR 380 for a start, before you make wild accusations about skirting the regulations. You don’t have to like the business model of JSX but the fact remains it is within the regulations. Period. End of story.

By the way, I am pretty sure others (a big name in NC comes to mind) are operating under this Public charter model as well and Alpa isn’t concerned?

Last edited by CaptainJay; 07-10-2023 at 07:40 PM.
Reply
Old 07-10-2023 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 281
Likes: 9
Default

It doesnt matter if its a "loop hole", it is legal under the current regs. If anyone doesnt believe ALPA is only interested becasue a. JSX is non-union, or b. ALPA would TOTALLY support the business model IF JSX was a union shop and ALPA could siphon dues.

There is no reason for a Union that has no buisness, in this business, to care about this unless it somehow affects them.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sqwk1200
Major
68
07-14-2017 05:37 PM
Pony Express
Part 91 and Low Time
13
10-29-2013 11:04 PM
concorde84
Safety
1
03-27-2012 12:30 PM
AZFlyer
Hangar Talk
18
08-23-2009 07:27 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
0
06-05-2006 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices