JSX under attack
#1
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
#5
Correction, JSX is skirting regs which goes semi-under the radar and ALPA has a problem with it. Just wait until a big red-striped airplane augers into a residential neighborhood, and the traveling public finds out the hard way that they don't have to hire or train to standards that they think JSX does...
#7
Line Holder
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 373
Likes: 1
It's unknown whether the law allows or disallows what they're doing. The courts or a regulator will need to get involved. However, it can be safely assumed the intent of the regulation (which isn't itself a law) wasn't to allow front companies owned by a single holding company to "ease" their certification process with technicalities.
#8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streamline_Air
Last edited by CaptainJay; 07-10-2023 at 06:47 PM.
#9
By the way, I am pretty sure others (a big name in NC comes to mind) are operating under this Public charter model as well and Alpa isn’t concerned?
Last edited by CaptainJay; 07-10-2023 at 07:40 PM.
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 281
Likes: 9
It doesnt matter if its a "loop hole", it is legal under the current regs. If anyone doesnt believe ALPA is only interested becasue a. JSX is non-union, or b. ALPA would TOTALLY support the business model IF JSX was a union shop and ALPA could siphon dues.
There is no reason for a Union that has no buisness, in this business, to care about this unless it somehow affects them.
There is no reason for a Union that has no buisness, in this business, to care about this unless it somehow affects them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



