Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > CommutAir
Initial Involuntary Furlough letters >

Initial Involuntary Furlough letters

Search
Notices
CommutAir Regional Airline

Initial Involuntary Furlough letters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2020, 03:35 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff90 View Post
from what I’m seeing it stopped at 382of 466 I believe so about 20% on furlough give or take, then most that stayed most likely got 40 hour long call reserve, and I’m to believe if may schedule doesn’t reflect more flying hours more will be furloughed, they won’t pay 40 hours if guys are not getting activated off long call
It would depend on United’s projections of near term future needs.
I would think.
MaxQ is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 03:44 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by MaxQ View Post
It would depend on United’s projections of near term future needs.
I would think.
that’s the thing it’s all United dependent, and we only operate out of 2 hubs
Jeff90 is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 03:48 PM
  #23  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,470
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff90 View Post
from what I’m seeing it stopped at 382of 466 I believe so about 20% on furlough give or take, then most that stayed most likely got 40 hour long call reserve, and I’m to believe if may schedule doesn’t reflect more flying hours more will be furloughed, they won’t pay 40 hours if guys are not getting activated off long call
Ouch! So 20% furlough AND 40 hour lines for rest?
dera is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:18 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Ouch! So 20% furlough AND 40 hour lines for rest?
well 40 hour lines for who couldn’t hold a normal schedule for about 3700 hours
Jeff90 is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:25 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff90 View Post
from what I’m seeing it stopped at 382of 466 I believe so about 20% on furlough give or take, then most that stayed most likely got 40 hour long call reserve, and I’m to believe if may schedule doesn’t reflect more flying hours more will be furloughed, they won’t pay 40 hours if guys are not getting activated off long call

You say from what you believe more will be furloughed if hours dont increase in May....... What led you to believe that?
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:25 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 344
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Ouch! So 20% furlough AND 40 hour lines for rest?
Could have been worse. Initially I was thinking 50% furlough at least on the FO side. We lost more than half of our flying, which is a huge kick in the nuts. I'm pretty high seniority so I got a line but I'm looking at that only as a stay of execution. I fully expect to fly 60-70% of whatever I am awarded and more cuts to come in May if Trump doesn't call for a more rational approach (isolate those at risk, i.e. 60yo+ and let everyone else get back to work) by mid-April at the absolute latest.
njd1 is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:39 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
You say from what you believe more will be furloughed if hours dont increase in May....... What led you to believe that?
why pay guys 40 hours to stay home ?
Jeff90 is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:42 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by njd1 View Post
Could have been worse. Initially I was thinking 50% furlough at least on the FO side. We lost more than half of our flying, which is a huge kick in the nuts. I'm pretty high seniority so I got a line but I'm looking at that only as a stay of execution. I fully expect to fly 60-70% of whatever I am awarded and more cuts to come in May if Trump doesn't call for a more rational approach (isolate those at risk, i.e. 60yo+ and let everyone else get back to work) by mid-April at the absolute latest.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/...ovid-19-chart/

We will need a different strategy than what you are suggesting.
NeverHome is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:43 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Agreed. But they are doing that already so why would it change. I accept your opinion however it is conjecture.

Conjecture that makes sence though!
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Old 03-24-2020, 04:54 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
Agreed. But they are doing that already so why would it change. I accept your opinion however it is conjecture.

Conjecture that makes sence though!
If your responding to me, than respectfully I have to say: no we are not doing that. Some are, but not enough and certainly not early enough. That’s the problem. This was obvious, but spring breakers and a whole crap ton of misinformation has led to many not following good sense.

Had everyone taken this seriously early on (really only 2 weeks ago) we could have drastically slowed the spread. Slow spread less economic impact. Maybe the airlines would be doing better today, maybe. But that is of course conjecture.
NeverHome is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
GreaseA6
Cargo
28
11-28-2007 08:02 AM
Squawk_5543
Flight Schools and Training
6
03-22-2007 06:46 PM
Low & Slow
Major
0
02-07-2007 05:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices