Search
Notices
CommutAir Regional Airline

More Reasons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2022, 05:12 PM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by dovic91 View Post
The pay and work rules at C5 are well known, or at least they should be by now. There are other little gems that don't get discovered until one gets in the door though. Training is not AQP, but they say they are working on it. To say that the training is poor would be generous. To be fair, there are some great instructors, but they are hampered by a poor syllabus written mostly by people who never flew jets before. "It's how we did it on the Dash" is a common answer when asking why things are done a certain way. They advance pilots to be LCPs with only 100 hours of PIC time in the aircraft they fly. The base chief pilots all have little time in the 145. One isn't a captain yet, and one doesn't even have a type rating in the only airplane the company flies. Pilots from other now closed airlines have moved to C5 in the past year and have tried to bring their knowledge base along. It's like pulling teeth to get the legacy C5ers to learn. All of the whining and complaining when procedures were introduced that prohibited the use of pitch mode on initial climb was very indicitive of the low skill level of many. Equally as telling was the uproar over a recent change requiring the pilot flying to guard the flight controls when below 10,000 ft with the autopilot on. Don't ask anyone who hasn't been trained somewhere else how to fly an RNAV arrival. They quite simply don't teach anyone how to use the FMS at C5 and consequently nobody "trusts" the VPI because they don't know how to set up the FMS. Fortunately, I was able to move along a short time ago, with my certificate intact. So yeah, there are more reasons besides rock bottom pay and a joke of a contract.
They've been 'working on AQP" for years. The question of LCPs is a tough one---On one hand, they prefer captains to have at least a year on the 145, on the other, with the mass exodus, it's hard to find willing candidates with the time. I'm not even sure more pay for LCPs would help.
Some of the instructors are good guys with decent personalities..But some have been there a few years already and refuse to buckle down and learn the SOPs and aircraft specifics (especially instructors that worked other RJs). This is why there is so much inconsistency in initial training.
The base CP situation is beyond ridiculous. One busted their initial at an LCC and is back, approving your operational extensions.
Regarding PIT mode, it was a good option for those of us who can fly, and we had decent AOM guidance on it (for once).
The <10,000' control guarding has been in the books since the jet was brought online. It's more of the case of someone just discovered it and started making a big deal.
The whole FMS issue at the company could fill another thread. The entire attitude of the training department is, "they'll learn it online," which is the place to sharpen skills, not become initially acquainted. This stems from the excessive and increasing amount of sim activities to check off without increasing the sim block or dividing the sims into different sessions.
Westcoaster59 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 10:35 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by dmspilot View Post
Lots of horribly incorrect info in that post, Divert is the 45 minute FAA required fuel reserve, plus fuel to the alternate if one is required; Final Divert is a 30 minute reserve; and these have absolutely nothing to do with causing weight restrictions.
Pretty sure that extra "final divert" fuel contributes significantly to the overweight issues. The divert fuel is an FAA requirement. The extra reserve fuel is something C5 adds, because they don't trust their pilots and or dispatchers enough to made good decisions regarding fuel. That extra 600 lbs, along with the new weight changes, makes the 145 a 48 seat airplane, with no available jumpseat for many flights!
dovic91 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 10:43 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by Pancakelandings View Post
What dirt does C5 have on you that makes you their biggest cheer leader??
There may not be any dirt at all. The Kool-Aide is strong over there. While many/most see the shortcomings of the organization, there is a small, but very vocal group that continues to make excuses for the company. For most, it's their first 121 experience and they simply don't know any better. They made a poor choice on where to go or simply didn't have any other options and now they are stuck!
dovic91 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 11:20 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: A320 First Officer
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by dovic91 View Post
Pretty sure that extra "final divert" fuel contributes significantly to the overweight issues. The divert fuel is an FAA requirement. The extra reserve fuel is something C5 adds, because they don't trust their pilots and or dispatchers enough to made good decisions regarding fuel. That extra 600 lbs, along with the new weight changes, makes the 145 a 48 seat airplane, with no available jumpseat for many flights!

kind of off base With what final divert is. Std vfr divert is 1800lbs. For the 145 at C5.But we have had people on short final with runway in sight divert once they hit the 1800. The final divert number says hay dumbass your better choice is to land here we will let you go down an extra 600 pounds so you don’t divert in the flare.

The issue with weight has to do with the new pax weights that they have to use. It’s up to 209, std bags went up as well. Even though cut flew the plane for two decades with the old numbers with no issues. They are trying to get a work around from the feds. One is counting people without personal item which gives a weight credit. Total s show with the new weights.
flippedr6 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 11:54 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by flippedr6 View Post
kind of off base With what final divert is. Std vfr divert is 1800lbs. For the 145 at C5.But we have had people on short final with runway in sight divert once they hit the 1800. The final divert number says hay dumbass your better choice is to land here we will let you go down an extra 600 pounds so you don’t divert in the flare.

The issue with weight has to do with the new pax weights that they have to use. It’s up to 209, std bags went up as well. Even though cut flew the plane for two decades with the old numbers with no issues. They are trying to get a work around from the feds. One is counting people without personal item which gives a weight credit. Total s show with the new weights.
I stand corrected. You are absolutely correct about those divert/final divert numbers and where they came from. I remember hearing the story about people diverting on short final and then someone came up with the "final divert" number. The previous place I flew the airplane had just one number and they called it RSV Fuel. And I conflated the two stories and came up with a completely BS answer. But yeah, the new weights create a $hit show. I was flying into IAH a few weeks ago and every C5 flight was declining shortcuts. ATC sounded frustrated and asked WTH was going on.
dovic91 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 02:34 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 121
Default

Originally Posted by dovic91 View Post
Pretty sure that extra "final divert" fuel contributes significantly to the overweight issues. The divert fuel is an FAA requirement. The extra reserve fuel is something C5 adds, because they don't trust their pilots and or dispatchers enough to made good decisions regarding fuel. That extra 600 lbs, along with the new weight changes, makes the 145 a 48 seat airplane, with no available jumpseat for many flights!
You quoted my post, but didn't read it. There is no "extra" 600 pounds of fuel. The previous poster got it backward, final divert is 600 pounds LESS than the FAA required divert fuel, not 600 more.
dmspilot is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 09:58 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by BRJPilot View Post
Rarely an FMS issue. Instead, it's another issue with poor training. Both on the dispatcher and pilot side. They simply don't know how to calculate fuel burns accurately. Instead of just a divert fuel number they have one for divert and "final" divert? Why? Because as the story was told, they had people on final, two miles from touching down, getting to divert fuel and diverting to an alternate many miles away. Seems ridiculous, but that's what they were taught. The final divert number is 600 lbs heavier than divert. That 600 lbs makes a big difference on a small jet like the 145. It's part of the reason why C5 flights are so weight restricted. I flew this jet for many years, LR model included, and never had issues with overweight landings like we do now.
600 pounds heavier?

Try again!
godsnotapilot is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 10:06 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by godsnotapilot View Post
600 pounds heavier?

Try again!
Yes, I think it has been clearly established that the 600lbs isn’t correct. But is there any argument over why there are divert/final divert numbers?
piloto2 is offline  
Old 01-05-2022, 10:30 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by piloto2 View Post
Yes, I think it has been clearly established that the 600lbs isn’t correct. But is there any argument over why there are divert/final divert numbers?
Section 3 of the GOM

Divert = Fuel to destination + furthest alternate + 45 minutes (1800 lbs)

Final Divert = Fuel to destination + furthest alternate + 30 minutes (1206 lbs)

If you are going to land with less than 1800 lbs, declare “min fuel”.

If you are going to land with less than 1206 lbs,
declare “Emergency Fuel”.
godsnotapilot is offline  
Old 01-06-2022, 06:03 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 133
Default

Originally Posted by godsnotapilot View Post
Section 3 of the GOM

Divert = Fuel to destination + furthest alternate + 45 minutes (1800 lbs)

Final Divert = Fuel to destination + furthest alternate + 30 minutes (1206 lbs)

If you are going to land with less than 1800 lbs, declare “min fuel”.

If you are going to land with less than 1206 lbs,
declare “Emergency Fuel”.
I think you missed the point of the question there, ace. Aren't the two different numbers there in the 1st place because pilots were diverting to alternates when on short final at their destination? Kinda like the memo that management sent you guys telling you not to lick the suction cups to attach the window shades. When a company pays $hit wages and has matching work rules, there does tend to be a decline in the quality of applicants that are attracted.
piloto2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CLT Guy
Regional
24
03-03-2015 08:13 PM
Sonny Crockett
United
19
11-19-2012 05:42 PM
SkyHigh
Hangar Talk
28
08-27-2006 05:14 PM
captain_drew
Cargo
1
12-30-2005 01:17 PM
SWAjet
Money Talk
0
08-03-2005 06:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices