|
“Hey we got you guys a flow program, 2-4 per month”
“But that company isn’t allowed to interview you outside of our flow” “But it’s really only 2 a month” “But no one is flowing for the first 4 months” So really this was all a ploy by TSH to block career progression to F9 and reduce training costs, let’s call it what it is. We’d be sending 3x the pilots there without this ‘flow agreement’. I’m sure they’d do the same with DL if they could |
Is there any other example of this in another industry. When you really sit down and think about it, it’s really F’d up. You can’t apply to a job because said job has an opening for you in x years due to an agreement that you had nothing to do with.
|
Originally Posted by poorflyer
(Post 2817092)
Is there any other example of this in another industry. When you really sit down and think about it, it’s really F’d up. You can’t apply to a job because said job has an opening for you in x years due to an agreement that you had nothing to do with.
|
Originally Posted by stang
(Post 2816535)
Good to hear some interviews are happening! Staying hopeful updating monthly flying a bunch every month
I’m planning on publishing my app soon and I’m at 1200 tt |
|
Originally Posted by MrToomz
(Post 2818443)
|
|
Originally Posted by Fr8Thrust
(Post 2819442)
If pilots would just turn on the A.P.U., then the FAs wouldn’t need an A.P.P.
Passengers will be happier, crew will be happier and work better. |
Originally Posted by PanchoBarnes
(Post 2819591)
Agreed!
Passengers will be happier, crew will be happier and work better. I was just thinking that, run the APU, problem solved...plus all of these cycles cannot be good for the APU right? |
Originally Posted by Motoxer66
(Post 2819840)
I was just thinking that, run the APU, problem solved...plus all of these cycles cannot be good for the APU right?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands