Lear crash in SC
#31
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: DAL "Ultra Extra Super Premium" FO
Come on, folks, we owe it to the victims, including the pilots, to let the investigation continue and wait for the official report.
Any speculation is completely out of line.
It could be any one of us in the seat next time--maybe even tomorrow. Would you want your family to put up with unfounded speculation?
We should know better than this.
Any speculation is completely out of line.
It could be any one of us in the seat next time--maybe even tomorrow. Would you want your family to put up with unfounded speculation?
We should know better than this.
#32
New Hire
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Lear Driver
Lear60Capt...your take on this tragady is pretty much my take also..and when discovering that the TR's were found stowed...make me wonder why the TR were found in the stowed position...I will be looking foward to the NTSB report which will probably be months and months away..I am a Lear 35 driver and apreciate them reversers especially when the tiger bites your ass on a high speed short runway abort...speculation is not out of line if it will prevent another crash and loss of life...and my deepest condolences to the families on this tragady....knowledge provides wisdom which hopefull leads to safety...
Last edited by SonicBoomer; 09-29-2008 at 04:16 PM.
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
This post is specifically directed at a trend I see taking place on this thread. I will not speculate on the accident itself. I'm sure that "but for the grace of GOD, there go I" when it comes to accidents.
The trend on this thread has been to discuss the Lears inability to stop due to it's inadequate brake and tire equipment.
Focusing on the airplanes inability to stop has diverted everyones focus from the real issue - the DECISION to abort due to a wheel/tire/brake problem. As I said, I offer NO comment on the CAE accident, I just feel it necessary to strongly remind every pilot of the risk encountered during a high speed abort and of the small chance of a successful abort if said abort is due to any issue that would affect your ability to stop.
Bottom line, condition yourself to GO once you've reached the high speed range (usually accepted to by above 80kts). It is very unlikely that you will be able to stop after a high speed abort. Stopping after a high speed abort requires that the stars be correctly aligned. The brakes must be in good condition. The runway must be in good condition with good braking action. The procedure must be completed correctly. etc.
When I attended FSI for Lear initial (long ago) I was trained to GO once past 80kts for everything except engine failure/TR deployment/loss of directional control. Studies and statistics prove that high speed aborts end up in an accident almost 50% of the time - even when the pilot makes the correct decision and performs the procedure correctly. (Google for Boeing abort study, etc)
Be careful out there men!
The trend on this thread has been to discuss the Lears inability to stop due to it's inadequate brake and tire equipment.
Focusing on the airplanes inability to stop has diverted everyones focus from the real issue - the DECISION to abort due to a wheel/tire/brake problem. As I said, I offer NO comment on the CAE accident, I just feel it necessary to strongly remind every pilot of the risk encountered during a high speed abort and of the small chance of a successful abort if said abort is due to any issue that would affect your ability to stop.
Bottom line, condition yourself to GO once you've reached the high speed range (usually accepted to by above 80kts). It is very unlikely that you will be able to stop after a high speed abort. Stopping after a high speed abort requires that the stars be correctly aligned. The brakes must be in good condition. The runway must be in good condition with good braking action. The procedure must be completed correctly. etc.
When I attended FSI for Lear initial (long ago) I was trained to GO once past 80kts for everything except engine failure/TR deployment/loss of directional control. Studies and statistics prove that high speed aborts end up in an accident almost 50% of the time - even when the pilot makes the correct decision and performs the procedure correctly. (Google for Boeing abort study, etc)
Be careful out there men!
#34
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
You're right, that is what we are conditioned to do. And two things got my attention.
1. This was quoted from the NTSB~ The plane was traveling at least 92 mph, its minimum takeoff speed, when the crew thought the tire burst, Hersman said. ??? (Past 80 kts? Early recognition? Is this just a guess?)
2. When the tire(s) blew, maybe there was "loss of directional control"....
In any case, sad story indeed...RIP.
1. This was quoted from the NTSB~ The plane was traveling at least 92 mph, its minimum takeoff speed, when the crew thought the tire burst, Hersman said. ??? (Past 80 kts? Early recognition? Is this just a guess?)
2. When the tire(s) blew, maybe there was "loss of directional control"....
In any case, sad story indeed...RIP.
#35
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Even assuming eighty knots, NO brakes, no thrust reversers, and no spoilers; with over a mile of runway remaining, it seems like an aborted take-off should have simply rolled to a less catastrophic conclusion, especially considering the extra drag of the blown tire.
Any thoughts from Lear drivers? Thrust levers sticking (computer forcing them) open in situations like this? What is V1/Vr/V2 on the 60? What is the take-off roll? Perhaps the crew was following the training (over 80, go) some are touting on here; but, with the blown tire, were not able to get up enough speed to fly?
Any thoughts from Lear drivers? Thrust levers sticking (computer forcing them) open in situations like this? What is V1/Vr/V2 on the 60? What is the take-off roll? Perhaps the crew was following the training (over 80, go) some are touting on here; but, with the blown tire, were not able to get up enough speed to fly?
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Even assuming eighty knots, NO brakes, no thrust reversers, and no spoilers; with over a mile of runway remaining, it seems like an aborted take-off should have simply rolled to a less catastrophic conclusion, especially considering the extra drag of the blown tire.
Any thoughts from Lear drivers? Thrust levers sticking (computer forcing them) open in situations like this? What is V1/Vr/V2 on the 60? What is the take-off roll? Perhaps the crew was following the training (over 80, go) some are touting on here; but, with the blown tire, were not able to get up enough speed to fly?
Any thoughts from Lear drivers? Thrust levers sticking (computer forcing them) open in situations like this? What is V1/Vr/V2 on the 60? What is the take-off roll? Perhaps the crew was following the training (over 80, go) some are touting on here; but, with the blown tire, were not able to get up enough speed to fly?
Second, a Lear, any Lear that I know of, will accelerate well with all four tires locked. That's why they train to NEVER set the parking brake when holding in position (line up and wait). It is possible to push up the power and blow the tires before you realize it.
#37
I don't know all the details but I think the aircraft may have been very close to MGTOW with 6 souls (bags) and enough fuel (full) for a west bound trip from South Carolina to KVNY.
So even in a perfect world BFL margin (with the factor) would be very small for the LR60. (Even with the 3-rotor brake system)
Then blow MLG tire or just shed the tread (which has happened to me more than once) and this margin probably goes away.
The possibility also exists that the accelerated tire parts may have damaged the squat switch and depending on the aircraft mod status could have lead to the un-commanded stow of the TR's.
And then we have all the other factors:
Late night take off. (Fatigue)
Possibility of critter on the runway. (Strike critter - damage to other parts of landing gear and aircraft)
The LR60 was made to fly. What ever prompted the apparent attempt to abort is still unclear but we do know that the crews actions preserved the life of two people and for that I am sure they are thankful.
my hats off...
go easy
So even in a perfect world BFL margin (with the factor) would be very small for the LR60. (Even with the 3-rotor brake system)
Then blow MLG tire or just shed the tread (which has happened to me more than once) and this margin probably goes away.
The possibility also exists that the accelerated tire parts may have damaged the squat switch and depending on the aircraft mod status could have lead to the un-commanded stow of the TR's.
And then we have all the other factors:
Late night take off. (Fatigue)
Possibility of critter on the runway. (Strike critter - damage to other parts of landing gear and aircraft)
The LR60 was made to fly. What ever prompted the apparent attempt to abort is still unclear but we do know that the crews actions preserved the life of two people and for that I am sure they are thankful.
my hats off...
go easy
#39
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
NTSB released an accident summary including new factual information.
Click Here for Oct 22/08 NTSB update.
Click Here for Oct 22/08 NTSB update.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



