department aircraft
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Top reason to go to college
Originally Posted by RynoB
#12
University of North Dakota crashed their Citation 550 research aircraft this past fall in Alaska after a dual flame out while doing an icing certification (on a Sikorsky S-92 I believe). They say they are going to replace it; it got a quite a bit of use so I imagine it will be replaced sooner rather than later.
They also have a Cheyenne II, but it will be hittin' the road as soon as they take delievery of their new Eclipse Jet.
They also have a Cheyenne II, but it will be hittin' the road as soon as they take delievery of their new Eclipse Jet.
#13
New Hire
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Beechcraft Baron; Left Seat
Posts: 3
Kansas State University has a King Air and a CitationJet, and with the recent additions to the athletic department, they are looking at replacing their CitationJet with a brand new CJ3. Students get as much as 20hrs total between the two aircraft by the time they graduate, and for only $75 an hour when on athletic trips, its a great deal.
#14
Originally Posted by ksupilot
Students get as much as 20hrs total between the two aircraft by the time they graduate, and for only $75 an hour when on athletic trips, its a great deal.
#16
Originally Posted by ksupilot
we pay only $75 per hour for the first three hours then the rest of the trip is free for us.
#17
Originally Posted by Packer Backer
So let me get this straight, you pay THEM to fly their corporate jet around? I'll let you mow my lawn if you pay me $20. i wouldn't brag about this if I were you. All it means is that you are taking a job that a professional pilot could have. Wh0re.
#18
The CJ3 is still a jet. Where do we draw the line? What if it was a Citation X? Or how about a Gulfstream? Or a 757? I understand that it's a training program, but there comes a point where you need to draw the line. Where does training end and professional flying begin? I'm not going to go so far as calling them wh*res, but come on! I would hope that the professionals that run the program see how this hurts the industry as a whole (in turn hurting the university's ability to generate aviation income).
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
#19
Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
The CJ3 is still a jet. Where do we draw the line? What if it was a Citation X? Or how about a Gulfstream? Or a 757? I understand that it's a training program, but there comes a point where you need to draw the line. Where does training end and professional flying begin? I'm not going to go so far as calling them wh*res, but come on! I would hope that the professionals that run the program see how this hurts the industry as a whole (in turn hurting the university's ability to generate aviation income).
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
#20
Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
The CJ3 is still a jet. Where do we draw the line? What if it was a Citation X? Or how about a Gulfstream? Or a 757? I understand that it's a training program, but there comes a point where you need to draw the line. Where does training end and professional flying begin? I'm not going to go so far as calling them wh*res, but come on! I would hope that the professionals that run the program see how this hurts the industry as a whole (in turn hurting the university's ability to generate aviation income).
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
Besides, if it doesn't require two crewmembers, why make them pay for the time? It's not loggable anyway.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Imeneo
Engineers & Technicians
33
01-13-2007 08:44 AM