Man-made in a Wuhan lab?
05-04-2020, 11:12 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Originally Posted by velosnow
The case that ABC is a better source than a right wing nutter publication? Or even a left wing nutter publication? Indeed, nice job!
05-04-2020, 11:18 AM
#33
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 293
Originally Posted by velosnow
The case that ABC is a better source than a right wing nutter publication? Or even a left wing nutter publication? Indeed, nice job!
https://youtu.be/EjukWo3KMfI
05-04-2020, 11:19 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FO
Posts: 214
Originally Posted by Mesabah
The article doesn't refute anything, and is a blatant propaganda lie, your political bias has blinded you to that fact.
This would be like me saying oil doesn't produce climate change, and then citing an article from Exxon-Mobile, that doesn't contain any data.
This would be like me saying oil doesn't produce climate change, and then citing an article from Exxon-Mobile, that doesn't contain any data.
05-04-2020, 11:23 AM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Originally Posted by Chief Brody
yeah here is a perfect example of ABC news reporting on a fierce fire fight in Syria �
https://youtu.be/EjukWo3KMfI
https://youtu.be/EjukWo3KMfI
05-04-2020, 12:22 PM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Originally Posted by Chief Brody
yeah here is a perfect example of ABC news reporting on a fierce fire fight in Syria 👌
https://youtu.be/EjukWo3KMfI
https://youtu.be/EjukWo3KMfI
05-04-2020, 12:27 PM
#38
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 293
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Hey Chief: We're still waiting for proof that the virus was manufactured in a lab. Or proof that anyone in the administration made that claim (without backtracking when called out.)
You choose to ignore it
05-04-2020, 12:32 PM
#39
Perennial Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,504
Originally Posted by aeroengineer
Don't forget all those researchers climbing through caves in China picking up bat guano samples etc. to facilitate the research. I would guess that would be a perfect place to see a virus jump from animal to human. So many ways things can go wrong.
That is PRECISELY my point about not ascribing malice when incompetence would serve. They had what SHOULD have been a P-4 (biosafety level 4) facility with KNOWN deficiencies in both equipment and policies.
if you are handling organisms as dangerous as MERS or SARS or Ebola, IT DOESN’T MATTER if the organism you ket get away from you has been genetically modified by human intervention, by random mutation, or if it’s just the native unmodified pathogen which - you ought to know - can be dangerous enough.
If you are handling any of that stuff, and screw up, disaster is possible. Which is why you don’t necessarily want to put your lab in the most populous area you can find. And why you shut it down until things can be corrected, not just soldier on.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/...uspension.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/h...biohazard.html
05-04-2020, 12:33 PM
#40
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 293
Originally Posted by velosnow
And they issued a retraction and apology as the more reputable news sources do when they get things wrong. Didn't say they were perfect, just a categorically more reliable news source than actual propaganda/opinion blogs such as Breitbart.
Can you name one?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
