Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Delta trying to keep up the scare? >

Delta trying to keep up the scare?

Search

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Delta trying to keep up the scare?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2020 | 10:28 AM
  #51  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
Were those 2 suspected cases prior to the cleaning practices now in.place on airplanes?

The case is more than just masks for pax on airlines. If this virus was easily transmissible via airborne means I believe by now we would have 10x the number of cases.

Can exposure be from airborne virus? Sure. But im wondering if the anti viral cleaning is as much to credit as anything else.
They can't even see their own bias, they have completely discounted any other factors, personal hygiene, contact avoidance, food eating habits, etc. Masks are the only factor, and since you got covid, you must have engaged in non approved, non-mask wearing behavior.
Reply
Old 10-25-2020 | 11:56 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
They can't even see their own bias, they have completely discounted any other factors, personal hygiene, contact avoidance, food eating habits, etc. Masks are the only factor, and since you got covid, you must have engaged in non approved, non-mask wearing behavior.
Public transport has always seemed to be a cesspool of potential infections. Lol.

I believe NYC failed to implement anti viral cleaning practices for public transportation in a timely manner. Even though video from places around the world with similar situations showed staff spraying down public transport.

I think the airlines were even ahead of NYC in this respect. It would be interesting to match up NYCs infection curve against the anti viral cleaning beginning in public transport.
Reply
Old 10-25-2020 | 11:59 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Bizjet Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
and perhaps it would have, had not his other postings diminished his credibility to such an extent. Nobody likes an eternal hair splitting contest.
Why would nuanced, respectful debate diminish my credibility? In the other thread I have merely pointed out that a representative democracy like in the U.S. and most of the western world is still a democracy. The people don't make most decisions directly but they elect their representatives through a democratic process. If you call this splitting hairs it may say more about your ability to engage in intelligent debate than anything else.

Why don't you address the points I make instead of simply accusing me of hair-splitting. It's true that oversimplified black/white statements make for better headlines and provoke more reactions on forums such as this, but that doesn't make them right or appropriate.
Reply
Old 10-25-2020 | 02:16 PM
  #54  
Excargodog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by germanaviator
Why would nuanced, respectful debate diminish my credibility? In the other thread I have merely pointed out that a representative democracy like in the U.S. and most of the western world is still a democracy. The people don't make most decisions directly but they elect their representatives through a democratic process. If you call this splitting hairs it may say more about your ability to engage in intelligent debate than anything else.

Why don't you address the points I make instead of simply accusing me of hair-splitting. It's true that oversimplified black/white statements make for better headlines and provoke more reactions on forums such as this, but that doesn't make them right or appropriate.
Because as anyone reading the other thread can quickly see, it is PAINFUL even to have discourse with you. I could agree with you at the 99% level and you would be constitutionally incapable of allowing me that residual 1% without arguing about it. You are ENTITLED to your opinion but I am also entitled to mine. My opinion is that you are a pain to have a discussion with even when you are right, and impossible to converse with when you are wrong, a condition far more often than you will ever acknowledge.
Reply
Old 10-25-2020 | 02:35 PM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Nacho Libre
This post makes sense to me. Interesting when a well thought out post gets zero response.
Just because the guy writes a “well thought out post” doesn’t mean it has any substance.

That particular posts contains nothing but anecdotal evidence or speculation from personal experiences. I live in a Covid “hotspot” in the north east. If I came on here and posted about what my day usually looks like and what I see in various public places one could glean that Covid is not an issue in this region at all. That is clearly not the case.
Reply
Old 10-26-2020 | 12:08 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Bizjet Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Because as anyone reading the other thread can quickly see, it is PAINFUL even to have discourse with you. I could agree with you at the 99% level and you would be constitutionally incapable of allowing me that residual 1% without arguing about it. You are ENTITLED to your opinion but I am also entitled to mine. My opinion is that you are a pain to have a discussion with even when you are right, and impossible to converse with when you are wrong, a condition far more often than you will ever acknowledge.
Hey, if you don't enjoy discussing with me fine. No need to bring "anyone" else into it. I can accept your opinion. Just don't make it seem like everyone else agrees with you. I can assure you most people have no problem communicating with me (and vice versa) both online and in real life. Having said that, I agree that it seems to be futile for the two of us to continue this.
Reply
Old 10-26-2020 | 12:26 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Bizjet Captain
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
Just because the guy writes a “well thought out post” doesn’t mean it has any substance.

That particular posts contains nothing but anecdotal evidence or speculation from personal experiences. I live in a Covid “hotspot” in the north east. If I came on here and posted about what my day usually looks like and what I see in various public places one could glean that Covid is not an issue in this region at all. That is clearly not the case.
You know, I think you have a point. What I wrote a page or so back was indeed a mix and included anecdotal evidence and speculation. I would however disagree that my post contained "nothing but anecdotal evidence or speculation from personal experiences".

It is a fact that public health experts in Germany and elsewhere, just like in the U.S. largely agree that masks should be used indoors and/or where a safe distance cannot be kept. That's not politicians making these things up. That's politicians implementing scientific guidance. Yes, there is continued debate as to how much masks protect the wearer vs. the other person and just how helpful each type of mask is and what dangers come with inappropriate mask use and hygiene. None of that means that masks don't work, though.

As pilots we travel the world. It is rare to see almost the entire planet reacting similarly to a situation. Almost everywhere it is being taken seriously. Almost everywhere mask use is mandated. It's not about party politics. Almost everyone is behind this. In Germany that's all political parties from the socialists, greens, social-democrats- liberal-democrats, christian-democrats. The entire established political spectrum is in favor of following the advise of the scientists. The only opposing party are the far right AfD.

The other thing I wrote that makes logical sense, or at least so I hope, is that all those comparisons between populations that have worn masks and others that haven't are not meaningful as they are not comparing like for like.

It's also a verifiable fact, that at least in my country a lot of infections originate from situations where no masks have been worn, such as weddings, birthday parties, other gatherings.

There are still so many questions as to why some parts of the world are hit so hard while others not so much. There don't appear to be simple answers. Masks alone cannot explain everything but they can be part of the solution. Just google "scientific consensus on mask use".
Reply
Old 10-26-2020 | 03:57 AM
  #58  
FTv3's Avatar
Social Media retired.
5 Years
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 42
Default

“It's also a verifiable fact, that at least in my country a lot of infections originate from situations where no masks have been worn, such as weddings, birthday parties, other gatherings.”

Same song in the US & Canada. Proper contact tracing reveals this pretty quickly. Large, indoor, no precaution gatherings are how you effectively spread this virus.
Reply
Old 10-26-2020 | 04:37 AM
  #59  
FTv3's Avatar
Social Media retired.
5 Years
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
Medical professionals have confirmed that the virus is airborne, can float in the air for long periods of time, and does not need droplets for transmission.
There’s evidence of this but there’s also evidence, plenty of it in fact, showing the virus is transmitted via the droplet route. Contact with infected surfaces is also a transmission vector. Remember when the scientists demonstrated they could keep viable viruses on various physical surfaces for days at a time? Well, it hasn’t been shown to be a major transmission factor. Show us where ‘medical professionals,’ have proven covid is all airborne... For now it looks to be a distant second after the droplet type.

Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
Attempting to use cloth masks to stop an airborne virus that is only 100NM....useless as using a condom.....Masks made sense when the belief was that the virus was only transmitted on droplets. That is no longer the case.
So the virus doesn’t travel as an isolated particle. The natural environment, oxygenated atmosphere, sunlight, temperature, etc., would quickly disable the thing. It is essentially always piggybacking on some sort of droplet, be it aerosol sized for the airborne route or larger for the droplet type. Masks can catch these. Of course some will get through. The idea of masks was always to reduce.

As to your condom example, a condom with pinholes is still better than no condom at all in limiting STDs and unwanted pregnancies.

Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
but masks and lockdowns do nothing.
Lockdowns have been definitively shown to be ultra highly effective in reducing transmission; (and IMHO a cure worse than the disease).

Last edited by FTv3; 10-26-2020 at 04:41 AM. Reason: Clarification and typo
Reply
Old 10-26-2020 | 04:47 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FTv3
There’s evidence of this but there’s also evidence, plenty of it in fact, showing the virus is transmitted via the droplet route. Contact with infected surfaces is also a transmission vector. Remember when the scientists demonstrated they could keep viable viruses on various physical surfaces for days at a time? Well, it hasn’t been shown to be a major transmission factor. Show us where ‘medical professionals,’ have proven covid is all airborne... For now it looks to be a distant second after the droplet type.

So the virus doesn’t travel as an isolated particle. The natural environment, oxygenated atmosphere, sunlight, temperature, etc., would quickly disable the thing. It is essentially always piggybacking on some sort of droplet, be it aerosol sized for the airborne route or larger for the droplet type. Masks can catch these. Of course some will get through. The idea of masks was always to reduce.

As to your condom example, a condom with pinholes is still better than no condom at all in limiting STDs and unwanted pregnancies.

Lockdowns have been definitively shown to be ultra highly effective in reducing transmission; (and IMHO a cure worse than the disease).

Remind me again which airborne, aerosol transmitted, corona virus we have been able to stop the spread of, and develop an effective vaccine for. I forgot.

The life lost due to lockdowns is far greater than corona deaths. They shouldn't even be discussed as a viable defense.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices