Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Stanford: Lockdowns provide no clear benefit >

Stanford: Lockdowns provide no clear benefit

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Stanford: Lockdowns provide no clear benefit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2022, 08:19 AM
  #91  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,292
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post

Who had a vaccine for this.
That he actually inherited from the previous guy.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 09:01 AM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,123
Default

Indeed.

We were told, repeatedly, that it was incompetence from the previous guy that "caused" many deaths.

That the new guy "had a plan". That he believed anyone in charge who had 200,000 deaths on his record should resign?

With as much as a "lock" as anyone ever gets in US politics, the new guy's "plan" appears to be killing more people at a much faster rate. With the assistance of a vaccine.

---

Maybe pandemics are a force of nature? Maybe blaming a politician or a party is just stupid?
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 04:00 PM
  #93  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 50
Default

This is my surprised face 🤨
https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-w...t-inflammation
CSFletch is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 04:56 PM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 39
Default

https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-weighs-increasing-time-between-vaccine-doses-to-lower-risk-of-heart-inflammation
PatriotFirst is offline  
Old 02-10-2022, 04:22 AM
  #95  
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Merle Haggard's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 824
Default

Originally Posted by PatriotFirst View Post
https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-weighs-increasing-time-between-vaccine-doses-to-lower-risk-of-heart-inflammation
U.S. health officials are considering new changes to vaccine guidance that would lengthen the amount of time between doses in order to lower the risk of heart inflammation FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PEOPLE.
Merle Haggard is offline  
Old 02-10-2022, 07:42 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard View Post
U.S. health officials are considering new changes to vaccine guidance that would lengthen the amount of time between doses in order to lower the risk of heart inflammation FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PEOPLE.
Hmmmmm.. goes along nicely with the new study about heart issues after covid recovery! Lets double and triple up on damaging our hearts
RI830 is offline  
Old 02-10-2022, 10:34 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard View Post
U.S. health officials are considering new changes to vaccine guidance that would lengthen the amount of time between doses in order to lower the risk of heart inflammation FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PEOPLE.
I thought the vaccines were Safe and Effective for everyone? I don’t remember them saying “safe and effective, except for the 5% of the population that is immunocompromised”?
skywatch is offline  
Old 02-10-2022, 11:38 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard View Post
U.S. health officials are considering new changes to vaccine guidance that would lengthen the amount of time between doses in order to lower the risk of heart inflammation FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PEOPLE.
And for four doses too. But I’d like to see the studies and numbers on dosage amount, time between shots and required number of doses for kids. There isn’t data on that? Why not? Paul Offit told his own son not to get boosted? Why not?
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 02-11-2022, 09:21 PM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard View Post
U.S. health officials are considering new changes to vaccine guidance that would lengthen the amount of time between doses in order to lower the risk of heart inflammation FOR IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PEOPLE.
They’ve moved the goal posts about 100 times and you still think it’s only for the immunocompromised?

The mandates were originally a conspiracy. Even Brandon agreed. They still happened.
The vaccines weren’t going to stop Covid… conspiracy. We will have to get boosters… conspiracy. Ok, we’ll do boosters but only for the immunocompromised… nope, now everyone is supposed to get them. The vaccines have side effects… conspiracy.

Several European countries recommend not getting vaccinated if you’re under 30 because of heart inflammation.
Singapore says not to exercise for a week after vaccination because of heart inflammation.
Men under 40 are more likely to have heart problems from Pfizer than the Virus. 10x more likely if it’s moderna. Numbers are worse for boosters. Numbers are most likely worse for kids and teenagers as they are more at risk from myocarditis.
2 FDA vaccine directors resigned a few months ago over approval processes.

Data just came out that shows although the total risks are unclear, myocarditis is 133x higher after vaccination compared to normal rates based on 2017-2019 data. https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/321238

Actual study here https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...rticle/2788346

Dont worry, if you think it’s misinformation it’s co-authored by the CDC and FDA as shown. Again, most likely worse in kids as the study only goes down to age 12. Perhaps that’s why the FDA just today announced that they’re putting on hold the approval in ages under 5 years old… even though they announced they’re pushing it through just 2 weeks ago. Don’t worry, I’m sure the vaccine interval only effects the immunocompromised. If you’ve learned anything the last 2 years you would know that the rest of the world provides the actual data and then CDC and FDA acknowledges that data about 6 months to a year later.
Thedude86 is offline  
Old 02-14-2022, 08:41 PM
  #100  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Speaking of cost benefit analysis which I would think crosses paths with ethics; Anthony Fauci's wife is Chief Bioethicist at the NIH. I guess I knew she was a muckity muck in the industry somewhere in the back of my mind, but I was refreshed tonight.

https://irp.nih.gov/pi/christine-grady#:~:text=Christine%20Grady%20is%20a%20nurse,I nstitutes%20of%20Health%20Clinical%20Center.
block30 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Flaps50
FedEx
129
12-17-2017 05:09 PM
CompetentFool
FedEx
607
11-14-2017 03:19 PM
fdx10
Cargo
4
10-29-2012 04:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices