Federal Mask Cops Start Targeting Travelers
#11
#15
I read over the CDC proclamation citing chapter and verse of US Code. All 11 pages.
Can’t see where any of the cited laws allows them to fine people for not wearing masks or even enforce mask wearing. They can actually QUARANTINE people they believe may be infected, but not charge them with crimes.
Can’t see where any of the cited laws allows them to fine people for not wearing masks or even enforce mask wearing. They can actually QUARANTINE people they believe may be infected, but not charge them with crimes.
But for masks they'd have to try and piggy-back on some existing law since nobody seems to have gotten around to passing masker laws yet. Again, your prohibition example... most pols probably know better that to open a large can of unenforceable worms. We're getting to the point where they know that most rank-and-file LEOs will simply not enforce outrageous royal proclamations. Cops have enough problems right now without hysterical 911 calls for masks below noses, etc.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Forbes nailed this one:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybe...h=264d8016d40e
The order is a reflection of the change in Administration, both the President and his new Director of the CDC.
The new order is here.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybe...h=264d8016d40e
The order is a reflection of the change in Administration, both the President and his new Director of the CDC.
The new order is here.
#18
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
I'm still trying to figure out how the Federal government has jurisdiction and the legal authority to regulate behavior in a privately owned mode of transport (eg: taxi, Uber) that does not cross state lines.
You can make the case for airlines (crosses state lines and the entire system is federally regulated), trains (all government subsidized or operated), and municipal buses (same as trains). But if I own a car service in Tinytown, USA, why is the federal government involved?
I see it as just more government creep, slowly acclimatizing the sheep to the notion that the Federal government is responsible for every facet of their lives and can rule them by dictate.
You can make the case for airlines (crosses state lines and the entire system is federally regulated), trains (all government subsidized or operated), and municipal buses (same as trains). But if I own a car service in Tinytown, USA, why is the federal government involved?
I see it as just more government creep, slowly acclimatizing the sheep to the notion that the Federal government is responsible for every facet of their lives and can rule them by dictate.
#19
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 80
"I'm still trying to figure out how the Federal government has jurisdiction and the legal authority to regulate behavior in a privately owned mode of transport"
There is nothing to figure out. The government does whatever they want. Is this so hard to understand?
There is nothing to figure out. The government does whatever they want. Is this so hard to understand?
#20
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Oh, I understand it. I'm just trying to understand why half of this country WANTS it and the other half of the country is SITTING STILL for it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post