Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
US Reports Record 1.3M Covid Cases in a day >

US Reports Record 1.3M Covid Cases in a day

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

US Reports Record 1.3M Covid Cases in a day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2022, 09:55 AM
  #301  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by Tfork View Post
It was taken out of your math:



If no one was vaccinated, the the 17k becomes 41k, so 24k extra cases if no one was vaccinated per day based on your math.

So, I'm not exactly sure what you're saying about the ratios. And your use of percentages of total population certainly makes the number look small but aren't in reality. That's why I used the 24k instead. Don't forget, 24k extra cases equal much more in the long run.
Those are completely baseless assumptions that ignore the large number of other variables that cause infection, and assume vaccination prevents infection for all, which it clearly does not.

That is a funny statement, that I used percentage of the total population to make the numbers look small but they aren’t in reality? Those are the real numbers, and the total population is a real number. It is all real and grounded in reality. What it isn’t, is part of some fantasy that fits the narrative you are trying to push. So sorry if that is inconvenient.
skywatch is offline  
Old 03-09-2022, 11:58 AM
  #302  
Always Working
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by skywatch View Post
Those are completely baseless assumptions that ignore the large number of other variables that cause infection, and assume vaccination prevents infection for all, which it clearly does not.

That is a funny statement, that I used percentage of the total population to make the numbers look small but they aren’t in reality? Those are the real numbers, and the total population is a real number. It is all real and grounded in reality. What it isn’t, is part of some fantasy that fits the narrative you are trying to push. So sorry if that is inconvenient.
I don't mean they are not reality. I meant they aren't small in reality.

The only assumption there is that if no one is vaccinated, the number of infections would be the same for both groups. How is that a bad assumption?
Tfork is offline  
Old 03-09-2022, 04:44 PM
  #303  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Default

Originally Posted by Tfork View Post
Nah, you're making things up. How can behavior be a factor in historical data that cannot be changed. Any behavior has already happened. You can't go back and change the behavior. Red herring.

You either have a poor background in data analysis or you are not understanding the basic premise I am describing. If you are comparing two populations, they have to be identical except for the variable you are differentiating. That is not the case. You can take a large enough sample so that it estimates the populations you are targeting, but this only affects those within the population. Vaccinated and particularly the unvaccinated are likely to behave in very different manners. And by behave, I’m talking about the millions of activities not addressed by anything you posted.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 03-10-2022, 01:48 PM
  #304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Obviously delta came about in 2021, and was more transmissible... so even if the vaccines provided equal against new variants, more transmissible means more cases => more deaths. We can speculate what 2021 would have looked like without any vaccines.

Also in 2020 the at-risk population (including my octogenarian parents) was mostly hiding under their beds... that was of course not sustainable.

And yes I agree fatality counts are grossly over-stated, probably by at least a factor of two, but even if only 20% of recorded covid deaths are legit that's still far worse than the flu. Apparently that's too much for our society to accept. I advocated all along that we should just let it run its' course, and let people make their own choices about social distancing but obviously politicians and many voters had other ideas.
The Johns Hopkins study shows lockdowns only reduced death by 0.2%. Yes I agree delta was more transmissible but even with the original variant the vaccines were designed after, the vaccines lost any significant effectiveness after just 3 months. No effectiveness after 6 and in some age groups negative effectiveness after 7. The vaccines barely worked for delta and the first two doses did nothing whatsoever for omicron per Pfizer’s CEO. Even with the original variant the data shows after 3 months you were susceptible again, and those numbers get worse with each variant after.

if the vaccines were effective in any significant way and 85-90% of the vulnerable population is vaccinated then we would have to assume that the number of deaths could have easily exceeded 1-2 million in just 2021. Maybe that’s possible. We’ll never know, but that seems to be a stretch to me.
Thedude86 is offline  
Old 03-10-2022, 05:18 PM
  #305  
Always Working
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp View Post
You either have a poor background in data analysis or you are not understanding the basic premise I am describing. If you are comparing two populations, they have to be identical except for the variable you are differentiating. That is not the case. You can take a large enough sample so that it estimates the populations you are targeting, but this only affects those within the population. Vaccinated and particularly the unvaccinated are likely to behave in very different manners. And by behave, I’m talking about the millions of activities not addressed by anything you posted.
Yeah, you know more about data analysis than the PHDs that made the report. Go tell them how wrong they are because your obviously correct. There's not two populations they are talking about, you might try reading the report.
Tfork is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 12:33 PM
  #306  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Default

Originally Posted by Tfork View Post
Yeah, you know more about data analysis than the PHDs that made the report. Go tell them how wrong they are because your obviously correct. There's not two populations they are talking about, you might try reading the report.

I’m either not reading the same report, or you don’t know what it’s saying. Do you have a link?
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 01:00 PM
  #307  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp View Post
I’m either not reading the same report, or you don’t know what it’s saying. Do you have a link?
I bet it is one of those.
skywatch is offline  
Old 03-11-2022, 08:39 PM
  #308  
Always Working
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp View Post
I’m either not reading the same report, or you don’t know what it’s saying. Do you have a link?
I provided the link a long time ago to Skywatch, just go back a few pages.
Tfork is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpaceManX
ExpressJet
32
03-18-2019 05:02 AM
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
CaptainCarl
Trans States Airlines
10900
12-31-2015 11:54 AM
InformationEcho
American
75
01-30-2015 10:50 AM
Diesel1030
Major
1
04-24-2014 04:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices