Analysts webcast
05-09-2017 | 08:28 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 821
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Analysts webcast
Delta Air Lines hosts May analyst meeting on May 11, 2017 | Delta News Hub
Now that the Aeromexico JCA (JV) is up and running there will probably be strategy talk about this model going forward. Korean next and possibly others.
Delta and Aeromexico to launch Joint Cooperation Agreement | Delta News Hub
Now that the Aeromexico JCA (JV) is up and running there will probably be strategy talk about this model going forward. Korean next and possibly others.
Delta and Aeromexico to launch Joint Cooperation Agreement | Delta News Hub
Last edited by notEnuf; 05-09-2017 at 08:39 AM.
05-09-2017 | 05:37 PM
#3
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 652
Likes: 6
I'd guess the A terminal in Detroit is 99% Delta. AF has one flight a day, we picked up the second London so Virgin has zero flights and I've only ever seen one Aero Mexico flight.
05-10-2017 | 05:47 PM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 411
Likes: 5
From: F0
05-10-2017 | 05:54 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 821
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
05-11-2017 | 06:21 AM
#7
Thread Starter
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 821
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Why we would ever again consider a reduction in profit sharing for pay rates is beyond ignorant.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d..._8k-ex9901.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d..._8k-ex9901.htm
05-11-2017 | 06:30 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
You must fly out of a completely different terminal A in DTW. Last week almost every gate was full. Not a single aircraft that was not Delta. I think I saw a one AF flight there a month ago.
05-11-2017 | 06:52 AM
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,808
Likes: 27
From: 330 B
05-11-2017 | 10:31 AM
#10
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
I never have nor never will vote YES to any TA that has us "swapping or trading" profit sharing for pay rates. To do would show extreme ignorance not only of the mindset of big business but of history.
If we were to swap 1/2 of our profit sharing for rates the following would happen. We would originally see a little bigger bump in pay rates that would smooth out to neutral (if we hadn't swapped) by the end of the contract. Then when the next TA was negotiated we'd be at ground zero on pay rates and negotiating vs. our peers at the "neutral" rate.
In essence we'd see a small one time boost for that first year at best or better $$$ as a result. Then we'd be gauged and compared against industry average... now we have those rates at or slightly better than our peers PLUS profit sharing.
I'll never vote YES to any contract that cuts profit sharing. Don't fall for it.
Tail
If we were to swap 1/2 of our profit sharing for rates the following would happen. We would originally see a little bigger bump in pay rates that would smooth out to neutral (if we hadn't swapped) by the end of the contract. Then when the next TA was negotiated we'd be at ground zero on pay rates and negotiating vs. our peers at the "neutral" rate.
In essence we'd see a small one time boost for that first year at best or better $$$ as a result. Then we'd be gauged and compared against industry average... now we have those rates at or slightly better than our peers PLUS profit sharing.
I'll never vote YES to any contract that cuts profit sharing. Don't fall for it.
Tail
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
