Search
Notices

Side Hustle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2021, 03:55 AM
  #581  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default

Originally Posted by Jiggawatt View Post
Marcal, Misspoken, Seneca—interesting discussion on the risks of options. But couldn’t someone argue the exact opposite—that it’s better to start learning in a retirement account?

.
The “type” of account isn’t the issue. It’s the source of funds. If you have $500K in your 401K in index funds, don’t sell that to trade options is my point. Build your nest egg, and maybe use a small amount around that to use options if you’d like. That’s what I was getting at.
marcal is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 06:41 AM
  #582  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Default

Originally Posted by tripled View Post
thanks for the link razor.

I am not downing Razor or that service. I know nothing about either. If that service will not provide verified trading results for at least two years, walk away. You can thank me later.
Seneca Pilot is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 07:44 AM
  #583  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

So, tying it all together, what say the pundits on an Feb RMO strangle 15/40? You can play too Tegridy.
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 12:04 PM
  #584  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers View Post
So, tying it all together, what say the pundits on an Feb RMO strangle 15/40? You can play too Tegridy.
I'll propose a better trade would be selling put premium only. The IV is >100% and the max downside loss is capped at 100%- premium collected. It's a statistical winner. Max upside loss could exceed 100%, if the stock triples.

* Please don't take me seriously, I'm playing with a paper account. My trading opinions are equivalent to flying advice from a teenager playing MS Flight Simulator.
You would get better results using this as your decision matrix.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:08 PM
  #585  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
The options traders have had enough influence that I signed up for a paper trading account on thinkorswim. Tastyworks or Tradestation will be the likely destination for the actual account. It seems like Tradestation charges for data feeds, but I couldn't find that info on Tastyworks. Any traders care to chime in on fees for data feeds? Do you do the bulk of your research on the platform?

I've really enjoyed the TT education series. The Beginners course was a great review and I found the two series on Managing a Large/Small Account useful as well. I'm optimistic about successfully trading, but still not sure managing an options account is a better use of time than reviewing PPMs for passive CRE deals. Time will tell...

I don’t have a lot of time to post right now but I use Trade Station. I avoided it for years because I thought it would be expensive but it isn’t. I trade options, futures and currency futures. I got into automated systems years ago using NinjaTrader (C# language) but whenever I had an idea for an automated system, I had to hire a programmer to program it without even knowing if it would be profitable so I didn’t. Now, with Tradestation, they use “easylanguage” which is based on FORTRAN and easy to learn. The reason I switched to Trade station was because I had an idea for an automated system for trading options, and Trade Station is the only platform that supports automated options trading. I’ll have to look but I don’t think I pay anything for data. If you make a certain amount of round turn trades, the fees are waved. I’ll post more when I can after the family vacation or you can PM me any questions you have and I’ll answer the best I can. Trade Station isn’t nearly as expensive as I thought it would be, and with a virtual private server, you can set yourself up to have a program trade the futures market 24 hours a day, 5 days a week, while you’re working, sleeping, or hanging with friends or family. There’s nothing better than connecting to your VPS and finding out you made $3-5 K overnight. The opposite can happen though and those mornings suck.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:31 PM
  #586  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
I'll propose a better trade would be selling put premium only. The IV is >100% and the max downside loss is capped at 100%- premium collected. It's a statistical winner. Max upside loss could exceed 100%, if the stock triples.

* Please don't take me seriously, I'm playing with a paper account. My trading opinions are equivalent to flying advice from a teenager playing MS Flight Simulator.
You would get better results using this as your decision matrix.
Always good for a discussion. I would look at doing this on a stand alone basis as a strangle(you are correct about the theoretical unlimited loss on the upside) Pretty low volume. A mitigating factor is, I bought RMO towards the close on Thursday after a PITA selling of RMO in Fidelity after the name change on Wed from RMG to RMO at 31. Had to call a broker at Fidelity because they didn’t handle the conversion as seamlessly as I would have wished. Nonetheless, it would be effectively a covered call with the naked put as you suggested. I opened a TT account and instead of paper trading( a good recc ) I have made some differing trades (IC, butterfly, strangle, vertical) to learn(no pain, no gain). Spent 1 day waiting on a fill, had to adjust the bid the next day to get filled. I suspect on a low volume stock like RMO that might also be a factor.

I have used the “duplicate me” of several TT traders but was wondering about my own pick. Seems the metrics are as good or better than a strangle from the pro’s at TT. I was tilting towards the strangle due to my long RMO stock but would have considered it on its own merits as well as what you are thinking. Since I am a Boomer and am well acquainted with all the “missionary positions” of options, I was interested in some of the “bark like a dog” or “pretzel positions”.

Signed,

An old dog trying to learn new tricks

Last edited by Buck Rogers; 01-01-2021 at 01:48 PM.
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:40 PM
  #587  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers View Post
So, tying it all together, what say the pundits on an Feb RMO strangle 15/40? You can play too Tegridy.
For a second attempt, consider this double diagonal
-Sell FEB RMO strangle 15/40
-Buy MAY RMO strangle 12.5/45
-Net Debit of $2.70

*Reminder, this is like flying advice from a 12yo pilot playing MS Flight Sim. DYODD, YMMV, Objects in mirror are closer than they appear, You're about to become the bug on the windscreen. (YABBOW)
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 01:53 PM
  #588  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 3,191
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
For a second attempt, consider this double diagonal
-Sell FEB RMO strangle 15/40
-Buy MAY RMO strangle 12.5/45
-Net Debit of $2.70

*Reminder, this is like flying advice from a 12yo pilot playing MS Flight Sim. DYODD, YMMV, Objects in mirror are closer than they appear, You're about to become the bug on the windscreen. (YABBOW)

Effectively a very wide Iron Condor(my term) Would lower the cap requirement over 2 separate trades and maybe a better ROC?

IDKWTF a double diagonal is but I get what you are throwing down
Buck Rogers is offline  
Old 01-01-2021, 02:40 PM
  #589  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Default

RMO diverged from the market on Thursday closing on its absolute low while the market closed at all time highs. Not a good sign for the bulls. Given the ugliness of the chart and the lack of support below I would probably hold off for now. It is down over thirty percent from its highs in two days. I bet it goes down a bit more before leveling off. The wholesale cashing out of the investors looks a lot like a pump and dump to me.
Seneca Pilot is offline  
Old 01-02-2021, 04:37 AM
  #590  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 760
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
I'll propose a better trade would be selling put premium only. The IV is >100% and the max downside loss is capped at 100%- premium collected. It's a statistical winner. Max upside loss could exceed 100%, if the stock triples.

* Please don't take me seriously, I'm playing with a paper account. My trading opinions are equivalent to flying advice from a teenager playing MS Flight Simulator.
You would get better results using this as your decision matrix.
Gunfighter does your platform offer you IV Rank? That’s much more relative if you’re premium hunting. An underlying “rank” tells you if it’s volatility is elevated relative to its historical volatility. So RMO, for example has a rank of 32. Not bad for premium, but not great. I can’t remember if you said you use TW or TOS. TW has this built into the platform, TOS requires a macro which I have somewhere and can get it to you if you’re interested.
mispoken is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Datsun
ExpressJet
1312
03-08-2018 09:04 AM
Bruno82
Hangar Talk
4
01-11-2018 05:53 PM
just wondering
Hangar Talk
21
11-16-2010 08:53 PM
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
47
04-15-2009 04:44 AM
Noonan
Fractional
2
03-02-2006 08:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices